Hi, all.
Nautilus on rhel4 (and prolly other os'es/distros), is somewhat broke w.r.t.
openafs. Like the Mac finder, Nautilus looks at the unix mode bits to make
access decisions for files and folders.
Nautilus also ignores the umask when creating files (but not folders) on rhel4.
So, I patched
Jason,
Thanks so much for clarifying things, for the majority of users I think this
will solve a lot of file sharing issues. Most of our locations are dedicated
to a specific department, so traffic will stay on the local network. I do
have a few additional questions if you don't mind...
- Our ac
Is this what you need?
PKGINST: SUNWsan
NAME: SAN Foundation Kit
CATEGORY: system
ARCH: sparc
VERSION: 1.0
BASEDIR: /
VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
DESC: This package provides a support for the SAN Foundation Kit.
PSTAMP: sanserve-a20031029172438
INSTDATE:
billbaird3 wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to OpenAFS and was hoping if the community could help me determine
if it would be a good fit for my company. We are approx 150 people, with 50
home users and the rest in small offices of about 10-15 people. I would like
to have a main file server that everyone ca
On Mar 16, 2008, at 4:48 AM, Alberto Paoluzzi wrote:
have the main developers of OpenAFS considered a participation to
the 100 million dollars contest,
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03012007/business/apples_big_talk_business_janet_whitman.htm
, with a project of bringing both kerberos and openaf
Todd DeSantis wrote:
Hi -
If the problem is happening when you are trying to cd into
a volume, then this is probably a case where the linkData
field of the vcache structure has somehow become corrupted.
The "fs flush" and "fs flushv" commands will NOT address this
part of the flushing.
Then t
Todd DeSantis wrote:
> Hi -
>
> If the problem is happening when you are trying to cd into
> a volume, then this is probably a case where the linkData
> field of the vcache structure has somehow become corrupted.
>
> The "fs flush" and "fs flushv" commands will NOT address this
> part of the flu
Hi -
If the problem is happening when you are trying to cd into
a volume, then this is probably a case where the linkData
field of the vcache structure has somehow become corrupted.
The "fs flush" and "fs flushv" commands will NOT address this
part of the flushing.
If you have the
fs flu
First of all, please forgive me for posting to your mailing list
without first subscribing to it. Secondly, please CC me on your
replies since I am not subscribed :)
My question, is, if you build GNU findutils on your system, do the
-xdev option and the -fstype test work on AFS (you might te
Hello,
I'm new to OpenAFS and was hoping if the community could help me determine
if it would be a good fit for my company. We are approx 150 people, with 50
home users and the rest in small offices of about 10-15 people. I would like
to have a main file server that everyone can access, but also
Hi,
I recently ran into a problem with the Mac OSX Finder and AFS, which
was frustratingly difficult to pin down to any particular configuration or
circumstances.
The Finder would not allow _any_ file dragging out of AFS (circle-slash
icon), regardless of destination. Files could be opene
Just an idea:
have the main developers of OpenAFS considered a participation to the
100 million dollars contest,
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03012007/business/apples_big_talk_business_janet_whitman.htm
, with a project of bringing both kerberos and openafs to the apple
iphone?
The SDK see
Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
And it is not childish. It is actually a
very sophisticated way to achieve a result.
Language, as Orwell wrote so well about,
and political advisors of both parties
use so well, can be a powerful way to
confuse, misdirect, and to manipulate, as
well as the potential to en
Hi:
I am currently interested in installing the openAFS in the NokiaN800. Does
anyone know where I can find information on how to do that? Any documentation?
Appreciate the response,
Alejandro Gutierrez
Alejandro Gutiérrez, MS
PhD Candidate
Research Assistant
Samsung Electronics
System Softwa
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
Wesley Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Garrison wrote:
On Mar 19, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Wesley Chow wrote:
On a few of our clients (running 1.4.1), we sometimes get
"Connection timed out" with a single volume. Other volumes on the
same server are
1.4.1 is almos
> > Yep, I'll do that. I was just hoping there was a "bos restart"-like
> > command for clients that I could use in the meantime. It's not a
> > common problem anyway, so I'll just upgrade.
>
> fs checks; fs checkv
Not sufficient.
Hint: why does fs uuid -generate exist now?
__
Wesley Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Garrison wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Wesley Chow wrote:
>>>
>>> On a few of our clients (running 1.4.1), we sometimes get
>>> "Connection timed out" with a single volume. Other volumes on the
>>> same server are
>>
>> 1.4.1 is almost 2 ye
Mike Garrison wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Wesley Chow wrote:
>>
>> On a few of our clients (running 1.4.1), we sometimes get "Connection
>> timed out" with a single volume. Other volumes on the same server are
>
> 1.4.1 is almost 2 years old. Have you tried upgrading? 1.4.6 is rece
On Mar 19, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Wesley Chow wrote:
On a few of our clients (running 1.4.1), we sometimes get "Connection
timed out" with a single volume. Other volumes on the same server are
1.4.1 is almost 2 years old. Have you tried upgrading? 1.4.6 is recent.
--
Mike Garrison
__
Marcus Watts wrote:
Anders Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, for people to be able to see what's in the protection database,
they must obviously be members
of the (undocumented?) ptsviewers group. Is it safe just to add all
people to this group or are there other
impl
On a few of our clients (running 1.4.1), we sometimes get "Connection
timed out" with a single volume. Other volumes on the same server are
unaffected. When this happens, the client never seems to recover on its
own except through a reboot. This is unfortunately not very repeatable,
but it seems t
Hi,
> Hmm, I wonder if this really is a salvager problem. Did you compile with
GCC
> 4.2.x? If yes, try recompiling with 4.1.x. See
> http://www.nabble.com/Strange-access-problems-on-one-client-to12112808.html
Ubuntu 7.10 amd64 uses gcc-4.1 and the volume or at least the damaged
files where not a
22 matches
Mail list logo
