Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Derrick Brashear pisze: I care about kernel, not OS. What kernel version on those machines? Default distribution kernel: on Debian: 2.6.18-6-686 i686 on CentOS: 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 i686 -- xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear pisze: I care about kernel, not OS. What kernel version on those machines? Default distribution kernel: on Debian: 2.6.18-6-686 i686 on CentOS: 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 i686 Not what I expected.

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've build a debian package using default debian options (1.4.6) and I've compiled from source

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Michał Droździewicz wrote: Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've build a debian package using default debian options (1.4.6)

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Hartmut Reuter, dnia 2008-04-07 16:59 napisal: Are you sure your network interface is used in GBit/s mode with Debian and not just 100MBit-mode? 1) Iface is in 1000Mib mode 2) copying files from local disk to AFS structure (iface is omitted in this test) was slow, not the network copying --

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:04 napisal: and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB (copying from local disk to AFS structure) Parameters you gave to afsd, in both (CentOS and

Re: [OpenAFS] Delete on large directory tree causes client lockup

echo t /proc/sysrq-trigger and collect the output in the messages file; open a bug in OpenAFS RT. If you don't have magic sysrq turned on, fix that. Ticket open at http://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=93508 with sysrq output attached. thanks Moritz Bechler

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear pisze: Not what I expected. When you self-compiled 1.4.6 on Debian, I assume you downloaded a tarfile from OpenAFS and did ./configure; make, yes? What options, if any, to configure? I've

Re: [OpenAFS] Delete on large directory tree causes client lockup

Jeffrey Altman schrieb: Moritz Bechler wrote: I've not tested it recently but when testing the windows it seemed that the same/a similar problem existed there too. If you reproduce this on Windows, fs minidump and send the resulting afsd.dmp file to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried again and

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:04 napisal: and I've compiled from source with no options for ./configure except from --prefix In both cases the result was the same - slow speed around 8-12MiB

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:40 napisal: The same in both configs. Well, the kernel config options certainly aren't if you're using CentOS's kernel in one case and Debian's in another. :�§ I've compiled debian kernel package using kernel config from CentOS but this was no help at

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Michał Droździewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 17:40 napisal: The same in both configs. Well, the kernel config options certainly aren't if you're using CentOS's kernel in one case and Debian's in another. :�§

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

What happens if you compare with memory cache in both cases? Could it be the HD driver? A strace with the times for the different syscalls might be interresting. And, eh, good luck. Harald. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org

[OpenAFS] openafs-devel not processing messages?

I've posted two messages to openafs-devel lately (one yesterday, one today) and neither has come through... could somebody perhaps check on that list to see if it is operating correctly? Thanks, - a ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Derrick Brashear, dnia 2008-04-07 18:13 napisal: Well, all that's left is compiling CentOS' kernel on Debian; If you're willing it's certainly a valuable data point. I'll try to test it tomorrow and will submit some new data. -- Mike D ___

Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Harald Barth, dnia 2008-04-07 18:21 napisal: What happens if you compare with memory cache in both cases? Could it be the HD driver? A strace with the times for the different syscalls might be interresting. And, eh, good luck. Can't be HD driver - dd in both cases (Debian and CentOS) shows

Re: [OpenAFS] openafs-devel not processing messages?

If you subscribe to the list, they go through... On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Adam Megacz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've posted two messages to openafs-devel lately (one yesterday, one today) and neither has come through... could somebody perhaps check on that list to see if it is

[OpenAFS] Re: [OpenAFS-devel] AIX 6 compile

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Mazniza A Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have a question on AIX 6.1. I can't get openAFS to compile. First it asked for sysname and I specified it to be rs_aix61. We're using the following options to configure: We don't claim to support it; No port has

[OpenAFS] Re: Re: [OpenAFS] Speed difference between OpenAFS 1.4.x on Debian and CentOS

Are you sure on disabling crypt at debian side? For me, it seems that you turned off crypt at centos(which is turned off by default), and debian, you did not(which might be turned on by default?) - Original Message - From: Micha?Dro?ziewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cc: OpenAFS-Info

Re: [OpenAFS] web spam + system:anyuser write redux

Jason Edgecombe wrote: I remember that we had discussed web spam, AFS, and write ACLs for system:anyuser a month or so ago. Someone mentioned a script to check for system:anyuser permissions on users' public_html directories. Who was that, and can you share the script? Thanks, Jason

Re: [OpenAFS] web spam + system:anyuser write redux

Steve Devine wrote: Jason Edgecombe wrote: I remember that we had discussed web spam, AFS, and write ACLs for system:anyuser a month or so ago. Someone mentioned a script to check for system:anyuser permissions on users' public_html directories. Who was that, and can you share the script?