Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.5 fileserver

Rich Sudlow wrote: > Hi > We're running into issues with the 2 TB volume limit on > OpenAFS 1.4.X - has anyone been adventurous enough to use the > OpenAFS 1.5.x fileserver on Unix and used > 2 TB volumes? > > Thanks, > > Rich > 1.5 is not ready for unix yet. There is a patch for 1.4.7 that giv

[OpenAFS] Problems building on latest OpenSolaris (build 98)

Hi, I just tried to compile OpenAFS (1.4.7 and 1.5.52) on the most recent OpenSolaris version (build 98) on amd64. The configure flags used: --prefix=/opt/openafs1.4.7 --with-afs-sysname=sunx86_511 \ --with-krb5-conf=/bin/krb5-config --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var \ --enable-namei-fil

[OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.5 fileserver

Hi We're running into issues with the 2 TB volume limit on OpenAFS 1.4.X - has anyone been adventurous enough to use the OpenAFS 1.5.x fileserver on Unix and used > 2 TB volumes? Thanks, Rich -- Rich Sudlow University of Notre Dame Center for Research Computing 128 Information Technolog

Re: [OpenAFS] pioctl fails when AFS user != UNIX user

Robert Banz writes: > Have you patched your Solaris recently? It's Solaris 10 update 5, so it's pretty recent. > If so, try rebuilding OpenAFS > from source -- perhaps there's been another case of structure fiddling > in kernel land. I am using a build from source -- I needed the namei

Re: [OpenAFS] pioctl fails when AFS user != UNIX user

On Sep 22, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Daniel Debertin wrote: [[ Replying to my own original post for clarification... ]] Daniel Debertin writes: I am able to use 'klog' as long as the user I'm authenticating as is identical to the UNIX user I'm logged in as. If they're different I get a long delay and

Re: [OpenAFS] pioctl fails when AFS user != UNIX user

[[ Replying to my own original post for clarification... ]] Daniel Debertin writes: > I am able to use 'klog' as long as the user I'm authenticating as is > identical to the UNIX user I'm logged in as. If they're different I > get a long delay and then "Unable to authenticate to AFS because a

Re: [OpenAFS] when openafs becomes a windows IFS

Erik: OpenAFS does not implement SMB2 and implementing it would be non-trivial. Jeffrey Altman Erik Dalén wrote: > I've noticed that SMB2, which is implemented in Vista, has support for > symlinks. Would it be too much work to implement support for that on > Vista clients? I mean it might be be

Re: [OpenAFS] when openafs becomes a windows IFS

I've noticed that SMB2, which is implemented in Vista, has support for symlinks. Would it be too much work to implement support for that on Vista clients? I mean it might be better to spend the time on the IFS work instead if it's too much work, but if it's not such a big change it sure would be ne