I'd rename the cell to rccc.org
That's much easier to type, and no problems adding it into the
identities manager.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Loren M. Lang
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:42 PM
To: openafs-info
Subject: [OpenAFS]
A real foundation that will generate some revenue for the openafs
contributors and he people who have been a major contributor to the
Openafs forms would be great. Are you looking to assemble full time/
part time code contributors? How about a free and paid helpdesk model
too!
I really don't
Time skew?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openafs-info@openafs.org openafs-info@openafs.org
Sent: Sun May 04 13:56:55 2008
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Looking for Nokia N8X0 testers
Hi,
After installing krb5 and openafs, I copied my working krb5.conf
Cool! Did you post the code to the Mameo site? I will want to try that
with my N800. I'll connect via vpn from my house, log into my afs
account at work, and give it a try!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Edgecombe
Sent: Sunday,
Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Speeding up Salvage
On Dec 18, 2007 4:17 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The servers are running salvage after a bos restart servername -all
do the logs give you any hint why?
up Salvage
On Dec 19, 2007 9:50 AM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry, left work just before I got your email.
Yes I looked in the Boslog, this is what I found:
Tue Dec 18 11:04:38 2007: fs:file exited on signal 3
This is fine, kill -QUIT is the normal clean shutdown
:06 PM
To: OpenAFS Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] can someone point me in the right direction on
cleaning up RO volumes?
On Dec 19, 2007 11:33 AM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
My AFS deployment is much faster now that I've been cleaning up the
vldb.
One problem is that I
DEBUG|EXEC: /usr/bin/ssh -2 -l root afs02.dafca.local vldb_check
-servers /usr/afs/db/vldb.DB0
INFO |OUT: Ubik header size is 0 (should be 64)
INFO |OUT: Header's maximum volume id is 536871653 and largest id found
in VLDB is 536871649
INFO |OUT: MH block 0, index 1: 10.5.1.13
INFO |OUT:
vldb_check looks wrong!
On Dec 18, 2007 10:32 AM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
DEBUG|EXEC: /usr/bin/ssh -2 -l root afs02.dafca.local vldb_check
-servers /usr/afs/db/vldb.DB0
INFO |OUT: Ubik header size is 0 (should be 64)
INFO |OUT: Header's maximum volume id is 536871653
I have 4 1TB volumes spread across 4 volume servers.Is there any way
to speed up salvage? My afs.home RW volume server takes over 3hrs to
salvage.
I'm monitoring /usr/afs/logs/SalvageLog.0 to get an idea on progress..
is there a more accurate way?
Also do you have your bos server
salvager -parallel all8
no space between all and the numeral; replace the numeral with the
actual number of partitions to salvage in parallel.
you will be much happier.
On Dec 18, 2007 4:00 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have 4 1TB volumes spread across 4 volume servers
Hi all,
I didn't see anything written on a FAQ so I've got a question for you.
Now that AFS is quick I've been I purposely disabled my primary
vlserver.
SOme queries to the VLDB are fast, but 20% of them take a long time. Are
there any values I can tweek to reduce the wait for the other
Hi,
Before I execute the openafs 1.4.1 to 1.4.5 upgrade I ran a sanity
check of our OpenAFS deployment here. I inherited this system, I wasn't
the original architect and I'm a new hire here. When I arrived a svn
checkout of our source code to someone's afs home took hours. So I ran
some
This is great! I went from creating 25 files/sec to 614 files sec
I used Bonnie++ to test the performance of my afs volume.
Version 1.03 --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# tail FileLog
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 File server starting
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 afs_krb_get_lrealm failed, using dafca.com.
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 VL_RegisterAddrs rpc failed; The IP address
exists on a different server; repair it
I whish the logs were a little more
, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# tail FileLog
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 File server starting
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 afs_krb_get_lrealm failed, using dafca.com.
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 VL_RegisterAddrs rpc failed; The IP address
exists on a different server; repair
To: OpenAFS Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] getting there... any ideas on how to fix
On Dec 9, 2007 5:18 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# tail FileLog
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 File server starting
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 afs_krb_get_lrealm failed, using
, December 09, 2007 6:21 PM
To: OpenAFS Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] getting there... any ideas on how to fix
On Dec 9, 2007 5:18 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# tail FileLog
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007 File server starting
Sun Dec 9 16:39:50 2007
OK. just about all of my directories are accessable. But.. vos examine
just hangs, listvldb hangs
anything that needs access to the vldb
-Original Message-
From: Hartmut Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 1:44 PM
To: Jerry Normandin
Cc: OpenAFS-info
]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 1:44 PM
To: Jerry Normandin
Cc: OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Rebuild vldb?
Jerry Normandin wrote:
Hi
My directories in /afs/dafca.com/home
Are giving me a connection timed out for accessing most of them.
Before
this happened access
I know it's late, but I'm hoping someone that subscribes to the list
would have an answer for me.
I am looking at my vldb. Some of my volumes are not mounted. Here's
the reason why:
shared.tat_ng
RWrite: 536871053 ROnly: 536871054
number of sites - 3
server
I inherited a mess I want to fix. My AFS deployment here has old site
entries in the vldb. What is the best way to remove
Server entries from vldb ?
Do you have your Bonnie++ results? I did a Bonnie++ benchmark and
compared to NFS result and local disk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Mason
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:16 AM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject:
: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again. Numbers
On Friday 30 November 2007 02:52:06 pm Jerry Normandin wrote:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is
using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes
running.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mike Garrison
Sent: Fri 11/30/2007 4:41 PM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED
AM
To: Jerry Normandin
Cc: John Lockard; openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
the spec file is fixed in CVS and will be in thenext version also.
On Dec 3, 2007 10:02 AM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
with. I was asked to upgrade to 1.4.5
the RHEL3 srpm? The hugemem error should have
been fixed in that specfile.
and,
error: /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/openafs.spec:346: parseExpressionBoolean
returns -1
what's on line 346?
On Dec 3, 2007 2:21 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK.. I am running
This is the first
of Stewy --- Victory is Mine!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Brashear
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:55 PM
To: OpenAFS-Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:50 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ah
It appears that there's a problem with the openafs.spec file
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Brashear
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:55 PM
To: OpenAFS-Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:50 PM, Jerry
systems on Linux, again.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:50 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ah.. sorry about that I intended to post to the group. I thought I hit
reply-all.
Here's where I got the SRPM:
http://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.4.5/rhel3/SRPMS/openafs-1.4.5-rhel3.
1.src.rpm
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mike Garrison
Sent: Fri 11/30/2007 4:41 PM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3
] File systems on Linux, again.
Mike Garrison wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is
using
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes a hell of a long time to
create,
Delete, or rename files. I tested with Bonnie++... here are my stats:
. So.. I have my
work cut out for me.
Once again.. Thanks everybody!
-Original Message-
From: Harald Barth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:29 AM
To: Jerry Normandin
Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] openafs upgrade from 1.4.1 to 1.5.7
Hello
I'm working on solving an AFS issue that has been a problem at my
employer before I arrived here. Performance in general has been poor,
much slower than NFS. I ran bonnie++ to check this out and apparently
read/write performance was not bad, it was file creation, deletion and
renaming
35 matches
Mail list logo