I saw a mention of IPv6 support sometime in 2011 in my old email..
How are we doing on v6 support?
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer'ho...@hozed.org
7 ele
I can't seem to find any documentation on afsd.fuse... Is there a HOWTO,
or something? What works, what doesn't?
--
----
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer'ho...@hozed.o
===
ii openafs-fuse1.6.0-1 AFS distributed file system
experimental FUSE client
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:19:32PM -0500, Andrew Deason wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:22:08 -0500
> Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> > I can't seem to find any documentation
achedir /vcache -d
>
> and got initial results. I haven't worked much with it yet, but the cm
> started and responded to vfsops.
>
> Matt
>
> - "Troy Benjegerdes" wrote:
>
> > Something is broken or not returning particularly useful error
>
I have had this problem, but I attributed it to intermittent network
connectivity to the server.
There might be a real problem here though... What is your network connection
to the afs & kerberos servers like?
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0200, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My
What's the status on a deployable version of:
1) rxgk (so I can fix my currently broken cell by upgrading AFS
instead of downgrading my kerberos server to support des)
2) ipv6 (so I can stop having to play silly VPN dance games which
just give me headaches and delays in filesystem access)
Is
IPv4 address space is becoming a high-priced commodity
(see http://tradeipv4.com/faq/ ), and new user adoption of OpenAFS
may depend on a functional IPv6 implementation, or users will select
other distributed filesystems.
Because of the difficulties so clearly layed out below in a full
implementat
I believe the proactive case here would be to create an OpenAFS foundation
with the charter to work with storage hardware vendors to offer and market
storage hardware with the AFS server software pre-installed, in the same
way that NFS and CIFS servers are already embedded in the storage product
ha
> In my opinion, it is not necessarily too late for an OpenAFS Foundation.
> It is too late for an OpenAFS Foundation to market the existing
> implementation.
>
> Jeffrey Altman
>
>
I completely agree that marketing the existing implementation
is a waste of time.
What does seem to be worth ma
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:44:00PM -0400, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote:
> In message <5041328c.2090...@your-file-system.com>,Jeffrey Altman writes:
> >On 8/31/2012 5:44 PM, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> >> Since I can't kinit on my cell phone, how do I prove
> >> my identity?
> >
> >Assum
Don't think of this as a nightmare, think of this as an opportunity for
support contract upsales.
nightly installable builds and enthusiastic users that install the latest
one every day will make for a much more reliable product, and catch
problems before they show up and cause trouble for bigger
> > However, this requires having a much greater availability of release
> > management and testing resources.
>
> And perhaps an argument for automated tests that could prove out a release?
> If you mean manual testing resources, given the scope of platform support and
> myriad branches for Open
Here's some code.
http://gerrit.openafs.org/#change,6844
> As Tom Keiser wrote to you a few days ago. Start contributing code
> that is useable to OpenAFS today. If you want to write tests, people
> will jump up and down with joy. However, please do not stomp your feet
> and scream that no
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 04:06:12PM -0500, David Boyes wrote:
> > Just to say explicitly, while OpenAFS developers are certainly welcome to
> > use whatever techniques make sense to them, I am completely uninterested
> > in doing anything at all with any of those half-assed meta-build systems and
>
Sometimes I think we get hung up on 'good testing' vs having *something*.
The last time I worked for someone else, it was writing test code for Cray's
supercomputer systems. You don't get much more complex than a machine
with 30,000 cores in which 'acceptable' performance is defined as 'pushing
th
>
> If you set this up, I'm willing to be your guinea pig. It'll cost you
> enough support and/or documentation to get me over initial learning
> curve.
>
> Doug
>
> On 9/15/12, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Sometimes I think we get hung up on 'good t
I'm sure you'll be surprised by
> what cultural assumptions you discover I don't know. I see and
> appreciate your energy and optimism, while I think you're
> underestimating what you're asking. But if you can make something
> work with limited commitme
I'm looking to get all the low-hanging fruit with unskilled testing.
Particularly with regressions like this:
hozer@six:~/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse$
/home/hozer/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse/../../src/afsd/afsd.fuse -dynroot
-fakestat -d -confdir /home/hozer/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fu
> >> FUSE library version: 2.8.6
> >> nullpath_ok: 0
> >> unique: 1, opcode: INIT (26), nodeid: 0, insize: 56
> >> INIT: 7.17
> >> flags=0x047b
> >> max_readahead=0x0002
> >> Starting AFS cache scan...found 0 non-empty cache files (0%).
> >> afsd: All AFS daemons started.
> >> Segmentation
collateral damage when we
> started using roken, but only on MacOS, and probably only for non-32
> bit pointers,
> because MacOS does something odd with dirent.h
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wro
> > And I don't think OS X can handle more than a certain number of version
> > segments, or something?
>
> OSX is special, but, we already have the problem and define something
> special there.
> What we'd need to do is define everything as an dev version of
> whatever, but then the problem is
>
If a pre-stable -> master merge to trunk happens reliably every 3
months, it might be an obnoxious merge, but it can't be any worse
than merging rxk5 (for gory details, see
https://bitbucket.org/dahozer/tfs/changeset/10a38e703483fd99b3a41e99cba74f203524f731
)
The artificial version approach you
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:06:39PM +0100, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>
> On 17 Sep 2012, at 19:54, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > If 'rebuild with debug' symbols is the answer to find the segfault, then why
> > don't we change './regen && ./configure &
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:39:45AM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:06:39PM +0100, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17 Sep 2012, at 19:54, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >>
[snip]
> >> None of those steps knows about another, nor should they. If you want
> >> to enable debugging, just do it.
> >> If you want to provide a script which does debug builds, do it.
> >> Anything else is pointless complexity.
> >
> > Debug symbols are pointless complexity ;)
> >
> > If they
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:12:33PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > [snip]
>
> >> > If there's a perceived performance impact to having debug on in a release
> >> > build, then I want to
What OS is the server?
Do you have a way to archive the /vicepfb volume, the old 1.4
binaries, and the entire build tree of your new 1.6 version?
Do you happen to have the sources the 1.4 binaries were built from?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Jakub Moscicki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ju
Is that in the main openafs git tree RxOSD branch, or some other patch?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:48:11AM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
> Ah. Yup. Something like this:
>
> UserId author; /* Userid of the last user storing the file */
> UserId owner; /* Userid
I've seen the phrase "XYZ is 'committed' to ABC" several times on this
mail list. It's a very political flowery phrase, and makes everyone
feel good. Until 2 years elapse and there is no real result from
the 'committment'.
Has someone formed a legal organization, and filed 501.c3 paperwork,
o
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 01:07:11PM -0400, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 00:00:52 -0400
> Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> > On 9/1/2012 3:03 PM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote:
> > > In message <50424587.6010...@your-file-system.com>,Jeffrey Altman writes:
> > >> The Elders h
otentially liable, or it's not.
Is there a statement to what ends a donation to the Usenix openafs fund would
be used for?
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:00:51PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> On 9/26/2012 12:12 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Has someone formed a legal organization, an
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:12:25AM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Have the USENIX association lawyers been made aware they are accepting
> > funds in a manner which may expose them to trademark litigation from IBM?
Jeffrey,
I do appreciate all the effort you and the Elders have put into OpenAFS
over the past 10 years at least. That effort, and the release as open
source is why I switched to AFS to store my tax records, email, source
code, and made an attempt to store pretty much everything I've done
electro
> Backward compatibility is a requirement for the entire community. The
> only criteria that is specific to IBM is that we cannot turn off older
> RPCs for which there already are replacements and we cannot completely
> get rid of rxkad or kaserver from the code base. There are also some
> implic
> You of course don't have any obligation to care about how that comes
> across to others, but presumably you think that being part of a community
> is more useful than just striking out on your own or you wouldn't continue
> to participate here. So I assume that you don't *actually* hold most of
Yes, this is going nowhere.
At least it still matters to some people.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:45:25AM -0500, David Boyes wrote:
> Gents, may I suggest a time-out on this topic?
>
> This discussion is deteriorating into a personal argument. While both sides
> have good points to make, the to
> The actual reason why so much open source work is done by such people is
> not because they're better at it. It's because they drive off everyone
> who doesn't "have thick skin" or "enjoys robust exchanges of views" or
> whatever today's euphemism is for tolerating abusive behavior, and then
> u
The key here seems to be marketing, and getting inside the head of
the spread sheet managers (or just modifying their spreadsheets).
What do they like? New things, so they can impress their peers
because they got the scoop on some amazing new technology?
If we dust off some old AFS code and paint
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:13:58AM -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 11:33 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >If we dust off some old AFS code and paint up with YFS, TFS, and
> >WTFS (What The Foo is this File Stuff) logos, and have ourselves
> >a nice horserace all
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:49:08AM -0700, Ted Creedon wrote:
> How about taking a AFS wide survey using a aklog token driven one time pop
> up explaining that AFS is not being updated according to industry standards
> and that it needs substantial financial support.
>
> Most users are charged fo
rhaps a cc to the local spreadsheet managers would get the user needs
> better communicated.
>
> I.e. you can't aklog one time only until you fill out the poll, send it in
> w/cc to local financial folks.
>
> Tedc
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Troy Benjegerdes
need to add this message to 'tokens'
as well.
Would the developers accept a patch to add this to at least 'aklog'
and 'tokens' ?
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:10:23PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> I would hope that the donation link would be a more subtle, and equa
I'd say the summary is something like this:
1) YFS (your-file-system) is forking (or re-implementing) OpenAFS to be
able to have a commercially viable business & product that will have the
financial return-on-investment needed to justify the cost of implementing
a long list of things, starting wit
n-monetary contributions.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 07:36:55PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:33:07PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > src/aklog$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../lib ./aklog
> > This software is free software, and depends on your ongoing support
>
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:38:10PM +0200, Lars Schimmer wrote:
> On 30.09.2012 21:10, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> > One-time deals (on linux) that require interaction will blow up all kinds
> > of automated tools and leave the rank and file admins your enemy.
>
> Easy, u
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 07:55:36AM +0200, Lars Schimmer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2012-10-01 06:48, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:38:10PM +0200, Lars Schimmer wrote:
> >> On 30.09.2012 21:10, Troy Benjege
Locality, and latency to the server still matters.
Let's imagine we are 5 years from now, and there are at least 3 branded AFS
derivatives, and vendors touting 'AFS appliance' capability, and 'the cloud'
has been replaced by 'the filesystem'. As in, some derivative of the Andrew
filesystem.
Wh
Have you thought about what you can offer to SMB (small-medium businesses)
For instance, you charge $3.99 for the iYFS iDevice app.
What could you offer for $20/month? Would you let a third party resell
iYFS to the SMB market, as long as you are getting the standard yearly
incident support rate
Let's look at this another way...
If someone actually bothers to file an IP lawsuit of any sort regarding AFS,
then I think this would be the most credible sign of success I could possibly
imagine.
And then, in that case, if there were an issue, there would be sufficient
community resources to r
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:09:36AM -0400, Steve Simmons wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> > Let's look at this another way...
> >
> > If someone actually bothers to file an IP lawsuit of any sort regarding AFS,
> > then I think t
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> > My opinion is anyone filing suit against a 'derivative work' of AFS would
> > pretty much guarantee the end of the company filing suite.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:12:26PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Troy Benjegerdes
> > wrote:
&
Please have a look at:
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2010-May/017637.html
It may cost you less in the long term to simply upgrade AFS to use the
'non-standard' rxk5 implementation until someone releases a working rxgk,
or to contract with one of the support vendors to implemen
[snip]
> As mentioned above, any "commitment" made at the present time may
> not be relevant in a year's time. What I am able to do will depend
> on how much time I have available, what pieces are contributed by
> the community, and what features are needed by MIT and the community
> as a whole.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: openafs-devel-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-devel-
> > ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Matt W. Benjamin
> > Sent: 25 October 2012 22:38
> > To: Troy Benjegerdes
> > Cc: Jeffrey Altman; openafs-info@openafs.org
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:40:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 5:03 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:45:05 +0200
> > To provide a sense of ordering... rxgk standards work will definitely
> > precede tcp oob, though rxgk implementation may or may not. After rxgk,
FS? That way all the work done by YFS wouldn't be
> > wasted, and all of us would get rxgk sooner.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Robert Milkowski
> > > http://milek.blogspot.com
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: openafs-
urned out to be something that a significant
> number of real sites wanted to use.
>
> Matt
>
> - "Gary Buhrmaster" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Troy Benjegerdes
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What are the missing pieces
> > Last time I used memcache, I had issues with Java applications (Eclipse,
> > SQLDeveloper). They brought the system to high load until they were finally
> > OOM-killed when run under KDE on a machine with 4G RAM (512M or 1G of which
> > set apart for the memcache).
>
> In my (limited) experien
> > I would appreciate any other tips that anyone has.
> >
> > BTW, I proposed using a differently/named test cell/realm and was shot down.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Jason
[snip]
> Taking the other tack,
> I've never tried this, but think it might be interesting:
> set up a virtual environment whe
This seems to be a common cause of pain for people using AFS,
and I think its a user-interface experience that drives people
away.
You install AFS, and then all of a sudden you go do something
and your user-interface just hangs. You have not idea what
triggered it, you just associate 'crappy non-
fo/openafs-info
>
> ___
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--
--
Troy Benjegerdes
t;/Staffan
> >
> >--
> >Staffan H?m?l?
> >Lule? University of Technology
> >Sweden
> >___
> >OpenAFS-info mailing list
> >OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> >https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-in
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:00:39PM -0600, Tracy Di Marco White wrote:
> On 12/27/05, Chris Huebsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Tracy Di Marco White wrote:
> >
> > > We've been adding several 1.2+ TB servers, and it has become no longer
> > > reasonable to put a tape drive on
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:12:53AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, then, what i am looking for is a distributed filesystem (free of
> > charge and license (GNU or so)) replication over all nodes since i am
> > preparing a virtual mail server using
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:03:40PM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:36:40 AM -0600 Troy Benjegerdes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The advantage of AFS over a single system is you can have as many
> >incoming MTA machi
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:30:07AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Jakub Witkowski wrote:
>
> >>>No, no oops. The system just... blocks. You can interact with programs
> >>>already in memory, access open files, but not open new.
> >>>
> >>>I chose .14 mostly because I was ha
[snip]
> To that end, the OpenAFS Council of Elders has proposed the incorporation
> of a not-for-profit foundation to perform tasks necessary to sustain and
> further the development of the OpenAFS product and user community.
>
> We would like your feedback on this proposal, and suggest commun
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:46:00AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> Penned by Troy Benjegerdes on 20080508 16:11.40, we have:
> [..]
> | Finally, from a developer point of view, I believe it is quite important
> | that the first project of the new foundation be to migrate from the
>
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:58:53PM -0400, Dale Ghent wrote:
> On May 8, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> >Finally, from a developer point of view, I believe it is quite
> >important
> >that the first project of the new foundation be to migrate from the
>
-
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~alfw (PGP)
> ---
> ___
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--
--
Troy
roid has a fairly good third party file manager, but as
> I understand it, the WebOS API doesn't make it easy to write a file manager.
>
> Obviously, the terminal capabilities of both OSs allow for some semblance of
> file management, but GUI options are quite limited.
>
&g
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 07:04:00AM -0800, Alf Wachsmann wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>> Patches please!
>>
>> I just started this (I'll be on a flight to the bay area, of all places
>> in about 20 minute), and I ran into stuff like the ma
Okay.. this is interesting..
I have a cell with a server running solaris with IBM afs 3.6, and one
running debian with the debian openafs 1.2.3final2-6 version.
I have a directory with the following acl:
sh-2.05b$ fs la .
Access list for . is
Normal rights:
web:host rlidwka
web rlidwk
sy
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:42:53PM -0500, Jim Rees wrote:
> No. Arla, Coda and OpenAFS all use the same interfaces at least, already,
> so it's just a question of what nfsv4 is doing, or does.
>
> NFSv4 does not yet have pags. When it does, we'd like to use whatever
> OpenAFS uses for managin
I've had this happen twice now on an SMP machine (debian 2.4.27 kernel,
1.2.11 openafs packages from debian sarge)
Is this a known bug that's fixed in a newer version? It looks like an
SMP race condition to me.
IPUT Bad refCount 0 on inode 0xf8abadb8
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virt
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:00:36PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> >I've had this happen twice now on an SMP machine (debian 2.4.27 kernel,
> >1.2.11 openafs packages from debian sarge)
> >
> >Is this a known
Should I try applying this to openafs-1.2.11, or 1.3?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:32:51AM -0500, chas williams (contractor) wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> >Trace; f89976c0 <[openafs.mp].rodata.end+4459/d3b9>
> >Trace; f8983340 <[o
ms to work.
What is the equivalent of a linux PAM line like:
session libpam-openafs-session.so debug
--
------
Troy Benjegerdes'da hozer'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Somone asked my why I wo
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:22:44PM -0600, Tracy Di Marco White wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> >Has anyone gotten Krb5, ldap, and AFS homedirs working reliably?
>
> Have you looked at the ISU OS X documentation?
> http://tech.ait.i
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:48:04PM -0600, Ben Staffin wrote:
> * Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-03 20:29] wibbled:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:22:44PM -0600, Tracy Di Marco White wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Troy Benje
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:35:44PM -0600, Ben Staffin wrote:
> * Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-03 22:31] wibbled:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:48:04PM -0600, Ben Staffin wrote:
> > > * Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-03 20:29] wibbled
> Also, I assume you know that you have to add
>
> login_logout_notification= "aklog"
>
> to the [libdefaults] section in /Library/Preferences/edu.mit.kerberos
> (If you have nat clients might also want to add
> noaddresses = true )
>
> And I assume the kerberos is required for login in
> /priv
ivate
Archive.pax.gz Library Resources usr
/tmp/OpenAFS.pkg/Contents$ strings usr/sbin/afsd | grep
OpenAFS
@(#) OpenAFS 1.2.11 built 2004-11-02
What's going on here?
--
------
Troy Benjegerdes'd
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 05:53:26PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 6:15 PM -0600 2/16/05, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >I have downloaded the 'Latest release' link for OSX several times, and
> >thought I was getting the latest, but if I do 'strings' on
>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:15:31PM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >
> >>I have downloaded the 'Latest release' link for OSX several times, and
> >>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:43:36PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> Am 10.02.2005 um 14:45 schrieb chas williams - CONTRACTOR:
>
> >i am reasonably certain this is a race condition with the rename/unlink
> >done by afs afs_remove(). i believe this problem has been fixed in
> >the 1.3 version.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:12:04PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > "Marco" == Marco Spatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Marco> Is there any possibility
> Marco> to tell OpenAFS to release certain (or all) changed volumes
> Marco> at a certain time? Would be a great help.
>
>
nything about
> Fedora or other OSes, but I'd guess you should be able to recompile this
> module on FC3 or similar systems at least.
>
>
>
>
> I will be sending the patches to Red Hat very soon so hopefully future
> versions of pam_krb5 will include the fixes.
>
RV
records?
--
--
Troy Benjegerdes'da hozer'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Somone asked my why I work on this free (http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/)
software stuff and not get a real job. Charles Shultz had the best answer:
"
How many people actively use the AFS backup system, and not something
like amanda-afs, tivoli, etc?
I'm currently running openafs-1.2.13 on my backup server, and I have
some issues with recycling tapes that have partial or full backups in
the tape label header that don't exist in the database (due
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:57:40PM +0100, ed wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2005 16:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
> Stephen Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's three dirs per mail folder -- with one file per message within.
> > It really can add up when folks keep their e-mail for years...
>
> ./tmp and .
disconnected
operation are sort of the 'holy grail' of filesystems, and at least worth
a kickstarter and/or indiegogo.
Could some of the professionals here please estimate a direct dollar cost for
such a thing?
--
-
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> On 2/17/2014 11:10 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Could some of the professionals here please estimate a direct dollar cost
> > for
> > such a thing?
> >
>
> Who is going to pay for the design a
t from my iPhone
>
> > On 17.2.2014, at 18.35, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/17/2014 11:10 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >> Could some of the professionals here please estimate a direct dollar cost
> >> for
> >> such a thing?
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:07:08PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jeffrey Hutzelman writes:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 13:11 -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> >> So $10k for design, and $100k for implementation sufficient to protect
> >> a small business'
pelling pre-installed
software option for my bigger-than-life project for open-source hardware:
http://q3u.be/
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:27:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Troy Benjegerdes writes:
>
> > I remember hearing lots of arguments that getting rid of DES keys would
> > take tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that 'developers need
> > to eat' etc e
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:37:19PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Troy Benjegerdes writes:
>
> > Maybe we are not thinking about this in the right frame. There are
> > billions of dollars worth of cryptographic currencies that did not exist
> > when we started arguing abou
cy' behavior, then make a 'disable_request_key()'
option to the cache manager.
--
----
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coo
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
