Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-12-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:00:21AM -0600, Carmi Weinzweig wrote: > Are there plans for an x86_64 binary rpm for Fedora Core 4? I have plans to maintain OpenAFS RPMs for Fedora Extras, which will include x86_64, and presumably ppc although I haven't looked at that yet. There's a lot of infrastructu

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-12-01 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Carmi Weinzweig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Derek - > I installed the SRPM, and built it, but even though it shows: > > + : @ > + : @@@ > + : @@@ kernel version: 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 > + : @@@ base kernel version:2.6.11-1.1369_F

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Derek Atkins
I didn't even know there WERE x86_64 packages that went with the RCs. At least, I didn't see anything at www.openafs.org. There were some early RC RPMs built by others that I think included x86_64. Multiple parties did "test" RPMs. -derek Quoting Carmi Weinzweig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Derek -

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Derek Atkins
Nope. Take a look at http://dl.openafs.org/dl/candidate/ for yourself. If you find it, please show me. -derek Quoting Carmi Weinzweig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: There were for (I think) RC5 and/or RC6 (or maybe it was RC6 and RC7). /carmi On 28 Nov, 2005, at 10:34, Derek Atkins wrote: I didn't

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Carmi Weinzweig
There were for (I think) RC5 and/or RC6 (or maybe it was RC6 and RC7). /carmi On 28 Nov, 2005, at 10:34, Derek Atkins wrote: I didn't even know there WERE x86_64 packages that went with the RCs. At least, I didn't see anything at www.openafs.org. There were some early RC RPMs built by others

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Carmi Weinzweig
Derek - Do you know who built the x86_64 packages that went with the RCs? /carmi On 28 Nov, 2005, at 9:33, Derek Atkins wrote: Quoting Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Derek Atkins wrote: I have no x86_64 hardware on which to build RPMs, and vmware does not emulate an x86_64 pla

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Derek Atkins wrote: I have no x86_64 hardware on which to build RPMs, and vmware does not emulate an x86_64 platform for me. So, unfortunately, no. You can still build for x86_64, you just need a cross compiler. You won't be able to test

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Chris Crowther
Derek Atkins wrote: > I have no x86_64 hardware on which to build RPMs, and vmware > does not emulate an x86_64 platform for me. So, unfortunately, > no. You can still build for x86_64, you just need a cross compiler. You won't be able to test they actually work, of course. > -derek -

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-28 Thread Derek Atkins
Carmi Weinzweig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there plans for an x86_64 binary rpm for Fedora Core 4? I have no x86_64 hardware on which to build RPMs, and vmware does not emulate an x86_64 platform for me. So, unfortunately, no. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Med

[OpenAFS] Fedora Core 4 x86_64 binary rpm.

2005-11-26 Thread Carmi Weinzweig
Are there plans for an x86_64 binary rpm for Fedora Core 4? /carmi ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info