Okay, thanks all. For closure:
> Derrick Brashear:
> [snip]
> 1) use 10.1.2.16 to apply to that
Listing the IPs specifically within NetRestrict is the answer, thanks.
> 2) use 10.255.255.255, the classful subnet address, in the file to
> apply to that.
> [snip]
I'd assumed it would match broadc
* Andrew Deason [2012-06-18 10:30:28 -0500]:
> NetRestrict(5) still mentions that specifying 255 acts as a wildcard.
> 80fc888a9223050481de932233fe7121a48df194 removed one mention of that,
> but the other remains; should both of them have been removed?
That was the impression I got when I last loo
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:07:17 +0100
Ian Crowther wrote:
> #vos listvol 10.1.0.145
> Total number of volumes on server 10.1.0.145 partition /vicepa: 6
> root.afs.readonly 536870916 RO 2 K On-line
> root.cell.readonly536870922 RO 4 K On-line
> root.p
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:07:18 -0400
Derrick Brashear wrote:
> > /var/lib/openafs/local/NetRestrict (/etc/openafs/ too, but at the
> > moment I'm concerned about the servers) contains a single line on both
> > servers: 10.1.2.255
>
> that address doesn't appear in the list of addresses you showed.
