https://github.com/opencog/opencog/tree/master/examples/agents
Am Sonntag, 17. September 2017 10:05:48 UTC+2 schrieb Nageen Naeem:
>
> hey,
> I am trying to do some practice from a tutorial of "Creating a new mind
> agent", but the sampleagent file is no more in the opencog example
>
the link does not work
Am Montag, 2. Januar 2017 06:14:30 UTC+1 schrieb Ryan Hornbeck:
>
> If you want to try this way, I created a bash script that works on Ubuntu
> 16.04. You'd have to get a VM or Ubuntu box up, but it should work from a
> fresh install. Just another option...
>
that this is your special domain
but this is what i am thinking about it today :)
--Andi
Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2017 19:06:45 UTC+2 schrieb linas:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Andi <gabil...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>> Linas, thank you for your pre
Ludwig Wittgenstein: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
http://tractatus-online.appspot.com/Tractatus/jonathan/
Has there ever been an attempt to use the Tractatus as a blueprint for
progging an AGI?
Since Witti was no fool - could there be some good ideas in it?
It was a philosophical
to have to face that - no
escape ;)
An AGI needs narrow AI-agents. A human genius is often someone who is able
to perform narrow AI tasks.
--Andi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
I think the corresponding github repositories are the best answer to your
question.
Am Montag, 8. Mai 2017 11:05:03 UTC+2 schrieb Nageen Naeem:
>
> Hey,
> Is there any paper of implementation of opencog on hanson robot or any
> paper on sophia?
>
--
You received this message because you are
vious...
>
> In any case he says the reason for his "subterfuge" will be made
> obvious later. So I'm willing to wait ;) Could be a nut-case,
> could be someone eccentric with a lot of valuable stuff to offer
> No need to make a judgment now...
&g
Does anybody understand, what this post means?
Am Mittwoch, 22. März 2017 19:12:53 UTC+1 schrieb Carlos Miguel
Yarima-diGiovanne:
>
> The reason for the subter fugitives e for itives will be made obvious
> later. Prior work under aliases to escape some rogue elements in the
> clandestine
Hello, Ben
this is work from Andrej Karpathy. I admire him very much!
Do you know him,Ben?
Did you ever speak about your ideas (knowledge) with him?
My feeling is that this could be very satisfactury and fruitfull for both
of you.
And maybe he could contribute to open cog by playing with parts
Hello Mark,
ty for this idea!
Since legal language is more formal than every day NL, I think it is likely
that success is more easy.
--Andi
Am Sonntag, 21. August 2016 19:52:15 UTC+2 schrieb Mark Nuzzolilo:
>
> Has legal research been considered as an early use case for O
14:59:19 UTC+2 schrieb Ben Goertzel:
>
> Yes, it's down due to a malware problem I have not had time to fix ...
> I will get it back up eventually...
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Andi <gabil...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
> > ???
> >
> > --
what linas is doing with
link grammar. It's overwelming.
So if Google want to advance quick they should fund several teams in
parallel. And OpenGog would be worth some million in all cases.
--Andi
Am Sonntag, 31. Juli 2016 06:35:30 UTC+2 schrieb Gaurav Gautam:
>
> I did not know
This is great! THX.
Am Montag, 1. August 2016 07:11:31 UTC+2 schrieb Ben Goertzel:
>
> Here is a video of OpenCog doing basic reasoning based on natural
> language interaction, thx to Nil Geisweiller and many others
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu6zrwAVD0k=youtu.be
>
> It's simple but
. Juli 2016 02:59:56 UTC+2 schrieb Ben Goertzel:
>
> SANTA = Self-organizing Adaptive NeTwork Algorithm ... yeah, sure, why
> not? ;D
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Andi <gabil...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
> > Ben,
> > since it is your design:
> >
Hello,
I think the fontsize was choosen intentionally.
The small fontsize helps to indentify the example code en passant and
concentrating on reading and understanding the lesson as a whole.
Andi
Am Montag, 18. Juli 2016 10:28:18 UTC+2 schrieb Gaurav Gautam:
>
> Hello,
>
>
see it, physics lacks of understanding information as describing and
at same time building up space time.
This is very bad because physicist are the only ones who would be able to
do the math for it.
Andi
>
> Regarding the central nervous system, it is critically important to
> understan
16 matches
Mail list logo
