Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-08-03 Thread Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET
Hello all, Below another patch, working in production for us (from Brian Passante) Regards, Jerome MOLLIER-PIERRET, Tomao groupe KPF ## I also have this problem, and when starting MailScanner in debug mode, it return this error: In debug mode the error is : Bad RFC822 fie

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-08-03 Thread K.M.Ganesh
Dear elliot moore, Thank you for your response! The 'exit' is from the line: croak( "Bad RFC822 field name '$tag'\n") in Header.pm ? If I could ask you for some educated advice: Would it be ok to just comment out the croak line in Header.pm ( Till 5.0.1.7 is released :) I received the bad heade

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-08-03 Thread K.M.Ganesh
Dear ells, I just wanted to know the final status of this is? The problem is: Mail::Header and Mail::Internet, when a malformed mail comes in, the constructor of Mail::Header and Mail::Internet exits and MailScanner also exits. A total rewrite of Qmail.pm and QMDiskStore.pm is in the works and w

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-08-03 Thread elliot moore
Hello all.. What is the final outcome of the " -: in the header" issue? a) patch Header.pm? (Ref: Brian PASSANTE) b) The Qmail/QMDiskStore.pm patches? I just noticed that the openprotect-5.0.1.6 package file QMDiskStore.pm is a different newer version to the patch file offered on the website vi

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-17 Thread Clive Eisen
Clive Eisen wrote: Have finally installed mailscanner gets a little further but does not deliver, just loops on the same (broken with the -: header) message - this is a live service thats quite busy so I'll do some more tests tonight with debugging on I had to do this to get the broken email to f

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-15 Thread t.a. coen
Has anyone use openprotect with qmail that come within Qmail for Dummies (qfd.sf.net) ? Seems that qmail-queue from qfd is "bigger" that qmail-queue from OpenProtect (different pacthes maybe) What shall I do? --- This SF.Net email is sponsore

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-15 Thread Clive Eisen
S Karthikeyan wrote: Dear Clive Eisen, write(2, "Bad RFC822 field name \'\'\n at /us"..., 86) = 86 Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header field "-:" which crashes MailScanner. Working on a patch. Do you have an eta Anything we can do to help? Thanks to you, Clive

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-11 Thread S Karthikeyan
Dear Clive Eisen, Fab - thanks I'll give it a try tomorrow - does it include the big-todo stuff as well? - if not I'll hand patch Yup, it includes the big-todo patch as well. Just copy the Qmail.pm and QMDiskStore.pm to /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/ directory and restart openprotect "openp

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-11 Thread Clive Eisen
S Karthikeyan wrote: Dear Clive Eisen, write(2, "Bad RFC822 field name \'\'\n at /us"..., 86) = 86 Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header field "-:" which crashes MailScanner. Working on a patch. Do you have an eta Anything we can do to help? Thanks to you, Clive

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-10 Thread S Karthikeyan
Dear Clive Eisen, write(2, "Bad RFC822 field name \'\'\n at /us"..., 86) = 86 Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header field "-:" which crashes MailScanner. Working on a patch. Do you have an eta Anything we can do to help? Thanks to you, Clive and Brian PASSANTE and

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-07 Thread S Karthikeyan
Dear Brian PASSANTE, About a tips: just comment the 210 & 211 ligne of the Header.pm : croak( "Bad RFC822 field name '$tag'\n") unless(defined $ctag && $ctag =~ /\A($FIELD_NAME|From )/oi); It is not so really bad, because, if Qmail receive a buggy headers mail, it refuses it so we don't have to rea

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-03 Thread Clive Eisen
write(2, "Bad RFC822 field name \'\'\n at /us"..., 86) = 86 Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header field "-:" which crashes MailScanner. Working on a patch. Do you have an eta Anything we can do to help? --- This

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-02 Thread S Karthikeyan
Dear pg, Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header field "-:" which crashes MailScanner. Working on a patch. cheers, G. I'm courious about how can such messages get into the queue? I dont know what the protocol says about it, but i think the MTA should do something wi

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-02 Thread pg
Hi, > > Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header > field "-:" which crashes MailScanner. > > Working on a patch. > > cheers, > G. I'm courious about how can such messages get into the queue? I dont know what the protocol says about it, but i think the MTA should do

Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash

2004-06-02 Thread K.M.Ganesh
Hi, I have the same type problem as Mauro Marcon : I think Muaro Marcon's problem is little bit differnt. And I can reproduce it with a specific spam... write(2, "Bad RFC822 field name \'\'\n at /us"..., 86) = 86 Mail::Internet seems to be the culprit, the message has a rouge header field "-:" wh