t: Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] OpenProtect-5.0.1.7 released
Dear Matt Bullock,
> I tried increasing the timeout to 90 per a faq I found on the
> mailscanner website, but it didn't help the problem. I will try to
> throw a faster machine together to test.
Awaiting your feedback,
che
Dear Matt Bullock,
I tried increasing the timeout to 90 per a faq I found on the
mailscanner website, but it didn't help the problem. I will try to
throw a faster machine together to test.
Awaiting your feedback,
cheers,
Karthikeyan, S.
--
S.Karthikeyan | Ph: +91 (0) 44 52166646 Fax: +91 (0) 44 52
Dear Tristan Rhodes,
Yes, I believe it is the custom Spamassassin rulesets that are using
more memory. One change that has been discussed on the MailScanner
mailing list is to stop using the BigEvil ruleset and replace it with
Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI .
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sp
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of S Karthikeyan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] OpenProtect-5.0.1.7 released
Dear Matt Bullock,
> Would that bypass the rules completely? Part of the reason
Yes, I believe it is the custom Spamassassin rulesets that are using more memory. One change that
has been discussed on the MailScanner mailing list is to stop using the BigEvil ruleset and replace
it with Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI .
http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/
BigEvil has
Dear Matt Bullock,
> Would that bypass the rules completely? Part of the reason for the
> upgrade was to put all the rules into effect to aid in catching a higher
> percentage of spam.
>
> One thing is for sure though, I wont try the newer version until I
> upgrade the memory to 512 MB
Well, the f
Networks, Inc.
Network Administrator
805.367.2728
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of S Karthikeyan
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 11:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] OpenProtect-5.0.1.7 released
Dear Matt Bullock
Dear Matt Bullock,
Running redhat 9, version 5.0.1.5,
Ran openprotect-uninstall, then installed 5.0.1.7. It started fine, but
once I made any changes to Mailscanner.conf and restarted openprotect, I
started getting messages that spamassassin was timing out. Mail
wouldn't process any further, and
Running redhat 9, version 5.0.1.5,
Ran openprotect-uninstall, then installed 5.0.1.7. It started fine, but
once I made any changes to Mailscanner.conf and restarted openprotect, I
started getting messages that spamassassin was timing out. Mail
wouldn't process any further, and it would just sit
