Finalising archetype meta-data

2014-11-20 Thread Thomas Beale
he structure is logically a keyed >> list of values, where we never know the keys, and in the >> 'conversion_details' case, because we are not currently sure of the >> keys (and maybe we'll never have standard keys for that). >> >> - thomas >> >> __

Finalising archetype meta-data

2014-11-20 Thread Heath Frankel
a keyed list of values, where we never know the keys, and in the 'conversion_details' case, because we are not currently sure of the keys (and maybe we'll never have standard keys for that). - thomas ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141120/83745581/attachment.html>

Finalising archetype meta-data

2014-11-20 Thread Thomas Beale
p://location.in.clinicalelementmodels.com>"> ["tool"] = <"cem2adl v6.3.0"> ["time"] = <"2014-11-03T09:05:00"> > This is because in the first case, the structure is logically a keyed list of values, where we never know the keys, and in the 'conversion_details' case, because we are not currently sure of the keys (and maybe we'll never have standard keys for that). - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141120/06ec350a/attachment.html>

Problem-oriented records and querying by problem

2014-11-20 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:12:31PM -0300, pablo pazos wrote: > The question was not "how to do X in a POMR", the question > was "how to model a POMR in openEHR". Please read my first > message to the list. I certainly did. I was not precise in my first wording. What I wanted to point out was tha