RE: SV: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

2015-10-05 Thread Heather Leslie
Hi Erik, Thoughtful insight. We do need to start dating rather than push straight to an arranged marriage, I think, and I suspect we need some from the respective communities to act as marriage brokers. The top down approach has not worked despite a number of attempts by well-intentioned indi

Re: SV: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

2015-10-05 Thread Thomas Beale
On 05/10/2015 14:31, Erik Sundvall wrote: Both openEHR and IHTSDO organizations want "everybody" to be able to use their "products" (in IHTSDOs case provided that you buy into the organization) so: * IHTSDO wants to look as documentation-model-neutral as possible. * openEHR wants to lo

Re: SV: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

2015-10-05 Thread David Moner
2015-10-05 15:31 GMT+02:00 Erik Sundvall : > There are many people reading this list, I wonder, where in the world do > you see organizations with enough resources (and/or power) starting to get > interested in getting shared practical detailed clinical modelling working > for real using both open

Re: SV: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

2015-10-05 Thread Erik Sundvall
Hi! Both openEHR and SNOMED CT have good technical foundations regarding versioning, semantic scalability, technical scalability etc. Both communities, although organized a bit differently have a lot of clinicians creating and updating interesting and relevant content. They cover complementary, on