> On 8 Oct 2018, at 23:09, Peter Gummer wrote:
>
> ...Attached to this email is the CLUSTER that Ian attached to the Jira issue.
Hmmm, I don’t think this mailing list accepts attachments. Here is the CLUSTER
as ADL.
Peter
archetype (adl_version=1.4)
op
Hi Heather,I think I've tracked down why this was changed in the Ocean Archetype Editor. It seems to be this change on 6th May 2012: https://github.com/openEHR/arch_ed-dotnet/commit/bb50d16ad44e910d717c9e75e967fe1b1af36c46 EDT-567: Allow assumed value to be set on any data, not just on patient stat
Hi Ivar,
On 27 Jul 2018, at 18:02, Ivar Yrke wrote:
>
> I actually did look into the code. After some struggling into the VB code
> (which isn’t my strong side) I eventually found that the problem also went
> into the underlying java-classes (which is not my strong side either). I
> concluded
Hi Ivar and Pablo,
Reading this, I had the vague recollection that old versions of Archetype
Editor used to have a stab at supporting the transition, but that I had removed
it because it didn’t actually work. A quick search of github … and here’s the
relevant commit, more than five years ago:
On 17 Mar 2017, at 22:39, Bert Verhees wrote:
>
> The several countries have independent organizations, and the overall
> organization cannot enforce a common terminology. There are two terminologies
> in this case, and those two terminologies cannot be mapped easily, because
> the granularity
Sebastian Garde wrote:
There is also an older related issue on the specs tracker
https://openehr.atlassian.net/browse/SPECPR-24
This issue highlights some potential problems as well, but doesn't have a clear
solution yet.
I believe it should be considered at the same time.
Hmmm, yes, 2009 ...
On 2 Oct 2014, at 21:13, Bakke, Silje Ljosland mailto:silje.ljosland.bakke at helse-bergen.no>> wrote:
I?m having trouble saving a particular archetype from Archetype Editor. Other
archetypes are apparently saved without issue. I?m getting the following error
message. The archetype is attached t
Hi Koray,
You could submit a change request at http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/AEPR
and it would be in the next release of Archetype Editor, unless someone has
some objection to this.
Once I?ve made the change, I could email you the updated PropertyUnitData.xml
file from
https://github.c
Tim Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Ian McNicoll
> wrote:
>
>>
>> You are conflating two quite different issues.
>>
>
> I don't think so. I demonstrated what the specifications have to say
> on the matter.
> Then pointed out that an internationally respected expert on ADL and
>
Hi Athanasios,
The way to do this in the Archetype Editor is by adding a "Choice" element.
With the Choice element, you can add multiple constraint types to the same
node. In this particular case, you would add two Text constraints, one free
text and the other with the internal codes.
This is
Ian McNicoll wrote:
> Are you using the openEHR or Ocean version of the archetype editor?
That would make no difference, Ian. The same ADL is generated by openEHR and
Ocean Archetype Editors.
I'm sure that the problem is that Pablo must be using a very old version of ADL
Workbench.
Peter
The current ADL Workbench from
http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_eiffel/TRUNK/apps/adl_workbench/doc/web/index.html
accepts this too.
I think you must have a very old version of ADL Workbench, Pablo.
Peter
On 29/09/2012, at 0:52, pablo pazos wrote:
> I'm getting another error in a constrai
Seref Arikan wrote:
> Thanks for all the hard work. I'll give it a spin under Linux and
> let you know how it goes.
> If I had a Mac (cough), I'd do the same for the sugar coated BSD ;)
There is not much sugar on the Mac build unfortunately, Seref, because
it doesn't use Cocoa. The Mac build
segunodujebe at yahoo.com wrote:
> The Editor is free software, I am not sure if it qualifies as open
> source.
Yes, the Archetype Editor is definitely open source. I gave the link
to its source in my earlier reply:
http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge_tools_dotnet/TRUNK/ArchetypeEditor
- P
segunodujebe at yahoo.com wrote:
> The route to viral adoption is open-sourcing of an implementation.
>
> Cambio most likely may lead in this since theirs is based on Java.
> May Ocean should!
Not sure what you mean there. ADL Workbench and the Archetype Editor
have both always been open sour
Richard Andersson wrote:
> What does it mean when a slot is constrained via the Include/Exclude?
> E.g. if I make an observation with a cluster-slot, add a cluster to the
> Include and do nothing in the Exclude. Is it constrained that only the
> cluster added to Include is possible to use in the s
16 matches
Mail list logo
