On 17 Mar 2017, at 22:39, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl> wrote: > > The several countries have independent organizations, and the overall > organization cannot enforce a common terminology. There are two terminologies > in this case, and those two terminologies cannot be mapped easily, because > the granularity is different. > > How this is handled until so far this problem is to add the two required > codes to an item. So everybody was happy. > > Now this customer is moving over to OpenEHR, and because DV_Coded_Text > accepts only one terminology per occurrence, this is a problem..
Hi Bert, I think you have missed the response yesterday from a couple of people, who suggested that you could use the DV_TEXT (or DV_CODED_TEXT) mappings.target: http://www.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/docs/data_types/data_types.html#_dv_text_class Your text item could have 2 mappings. The target of each mapping is a CODE_PHRASE, which has a terminology id and a code. Does that help? Peter _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org