Comments on "Terminologies in Information models", anyone?

#x27;s fairy right but not quite". To me it seems to >mix the physical data model for storing (and also messaging and user >interface) with information models. If anyone feels like commenting the correctness (or incorrectness) of the description, please do. Kind regards Vebjørn

SV: Downloading previous versions of archetypes from CKM

archetype, you will find it by searching also for status 'depricated' by ticking that status in search options. Hope this was helpful. Kind regards, Vebjørn Arntzen Sendt fra min Samsung-enhet Opprinnelig melding Fra: Pablo Pazos Dato: 27.05.2019 20.39 (GMT+01:00

SV: Moving towards the use of SNOMED CT in place of local codes for better interoperability

ge003.png@01D4D58E.5DD835F0][cid:image002.png@01D4D58E.00DB9590] Kind regards Vebjørn Arntzen Enterprise architect, RN ICT-dept, Oslo universitetssykehus HF and Coordinator, National governance of archetypes in Norway, Nasjonal IKT HF Tlf: +47 41 43 75 89 Primary email: varnt...@ous-hf.no<ma

SV: Archetype modelling pattern for Physical examination findings

Tip to read the figure: Click on the images, and there should be possible to zoom in by clicking on the + which appear in the low center of the image. Vebjørn Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] På vegne av GF Sendt: 7. mars 2019 09:47 Til: For openEHR clin

SV: A clinical modelling conversation...

too much to local medical professionals. Vebjørn Arntzen Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] På vegne av GF Sendt: 17. august 2018 10:38 Til: For openEHR clinical discussions Emne: Re: A clinical modelling conversation... Hi, Imho the grass-roots e

SV: A clinical modelling conversation...

need input from the community, and deep knowledge of existing archetypes to be able to make reasonable new ones. I'm afraid of leaving too much to local medical professionals. Vebjørn Arntzen Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] På vegne av GF Sendt

SV AW: Versioning of archetypes: Minor or major changes?

of the changes. This is definitely a interesting topic to examine more – synchronized version updates of archetypes among all EHRs will never happen for sure… Kind regards, Vebjørn Arntzen Enterprise Architect, RN Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway Tel. +

SV: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 6

Hi all To me a "questionnaire" is a vague notion. There can be a lot of different "questionnaires" in health. From the GP's in Thomas's example to a Apgar score, to a clinical guideline and even a checklist. Those are all a set of "questions and answers", but the scope and use is totally differ

SV: Any work on PHR?

Hi Remember vaguely that there are some attemps in Northern Norway regarding nutrition and exercise. Perhaps Rune Pedersen can give any clues? (I'll notify him) Vebjørn Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] På vegne av Ian McNicoll Sendt: 7. mars 2016 08:45

SV: Procedure archetype for operative notes

I'm not sure we would like to continue todays practice, when the surgeon is making the operative note after the operation is over. As a general rule, data should be captured as they are produced, to avoid the extra work afterwards. (And as we know, that gives us poorer data quality and delay). S

SV: Procedure archetype for operative notes

Hi all! May I suggest that Antje and Anca make a mindmap of their solution, showing the way the different archetypes beeing used fit together? That would clarify a lot. Would also be grate if Ian can make one of his suggestions. You can either attach it to this discussion thread, or use the ope

SV: Alive vs Dead

Hi all Remember that the Subject of Care could not be born yet, though I guess that in most practices information about the unborn child is documented in the mother's EHR. In case of procedures or samples in utero, some systems can create a health record for the foetus itself, and as a result o

SV: Memory Clinic / Older Adult Mental Health

es for almost any thinkable area of health. In that perspective, I'm quite sure that some geriatricians in Norway will be interested to both contribute and adopt the results. Regards, Vebjørn Arntzen RN, Enterprise Architect, ICT-dept, Oslo University Hospital Fra: openEHR-clinical [

SV: Memory Clinic / Older Adult Mental Health

r DIPS ASA is making a shift towards archetypes in their system DIPS Arena, the majority of Norwegian hospitals will need archetypes for almost any thinkable area of health. In that perspective, I'm quite sure that some geriatricians in Norway will be interested to both contribute and adopt

SV: Nation wide EHR project by openEHR/ISO13606 got fund in Japan.

Happy waves have arrived Norway, congratulations Shinji !! I'm joining Hugh here, please tell us more, or send us a link to a description of the nationwide EHR project, if there is any available in English. Surfing the waves Vebjørn Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.op

SV: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

uc?id=0BzLo3mNUvbAjT2R5Sm1DdFZYTU0&export=download] Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org<mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 7 October 2015 at 15:12, Veb

SV: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

eat skepticism towards how openEHR will solve versioning of archetypes. It's important that we will not be ruled by impractical thoughts like "not invented here", and "doesn't matter for the major part of us". Regards Vebjørn Arntzen Enterpr

SV: ACTIONs, OBSERVATIONs and procedures

versioning. Instructions allow workflows to be traced formerly in the health record rather than in an arbitrary way specific to a particular software. Cheers Sam From: Vebjørn Arntzen<mailto:varnt...@ous-hf.no> Sent: ‎3/‎09/‎2015 4:47 PM To: 'For openEHR

SV: ACTIONs, OBSERVATIONs and procedures

, signed, maybe co-signed, sent (the careflow steps are not fully identified). Is this relevant for an ACTION, or is it “something else”? It’s not really medical information, but still related to the patient. Any ideas? Vebjørn Arntzen Oslo university hospital, Norway Fra: openEHR-clinical

SV: [openEHR-announce] Extension of nominations 31 Jan 2015 - and join up now.

Uuuh, what? Ian, can you please translate into a more simplified language, for the bunch out here that doesn't have English as native language? Vebj?rn -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] P? vegne av Ian McNicoll Sendt: 7. j

SV: Postulate: DV_QUANTITY should be modelled with fewest possible units

What happened to "maximum data set"? To leave that idea by restricting units of choice on a national level in the definition of the archetype itself, will lead us into a dangerous path. To constrain in practical use through templates, is something else and in line with the concept, as I've under

SV: Postulate: DV_QUANTITY should be modelled with fewest possible units

I agree with both Ian and Heather. We should keep the archetypes as "pure" as possible, to deviate as little as possible from the versions in the international CKM. It gives us a bit more workload in the templates, but from a administrative perspective we gain a lot by not having a bunch of loc

SV: Relationship openEHR/CIMI

I have a strong feeling that "someone" in the Norwegian MoH have ordered a report that gives them a reason to choose a big vendor of EHR from the US? Like, let me think of a randomly chosen one - NOT - , Epic.This is political, and has nothing to do with the type of rationale that exist in norma