tachments/20110912/8ee52951/attachment.html>
Dear Colleagues,
I am often asked about the relationship between ISO EN 13606 and openEHR, and I
note this topic has recently been raised on our lists.
To say straight off, some people imagine there are tensions between these, but
most of the people active in taking forward 13606 are also activ
charge or not.
What do you think?
Regards,
Pablo.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110912/1cdf546a/attachment.html>
Hi!
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:54, Sam Heard
> wrote:
>> Let's stay with the issue of how we stop someone copyrighting and charging
>> for a specialised archetype? Or a template that is fundamental to health
>> care (like an antenatal visit)?
So, Sam have you finally dropped the thought that C
Ian,
This is exactly the reason I've been using Flex. Flex 3.5 requires
Flash player 9, which is 6 years old. Runs without an issue in IE 6,
gives me more power than the HTML 5 frameworks etc etc.
Naming technologies is dangerous due to possibility of spontaneous
flame wars, but what I've been desc
his problem...
- thomas
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110912/6bf69e2a/attachment.html>
':' are not valid as names in most operating systems, so it would be a
problem even for adl file names. That's why I don't think it is wise
to allow this one in particular.
The other issue was already 'discussed' on the list
http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-technical/msg05294.html
I hav
Pablo Pazos wrote:
> Web developers can easily tackle those problems ...
I'm afraid the word "easily" is wrong, Pablo. I've been doing mostly
web development for the last few years. I specifically mentioned those
things because they are _hard_ to do in in web development, whereas in
desktop
8 matches
Mail list logo
