On 11/04/2016 11:07, Bjørn Næss wrote:
But if we want to avoid double results in querying, we need some sort of
'is_derived' or 'is_copy' marker (and a link to original content) on the copy.
At least that's where I got to the last time I thought about it.
Yes - I think we need some kind of mark
On 11/04/2016 11:07, Bjørn Næss wrote:
But if we want to avoid double results in querying, we need some sort
of 'is_derived' or 'is_copy' marker (and a link to original content)
on the copy. At least that's where I got to the last time I thought
about it.
Yes – I think we need some kind o
But if we want to avoid double results in querying, we need some sort of
'is_derived' or 'is_copy' marker (and a link to original content) on the copy.
At least that's where I got to the last time I thought about it.
Yes – I think we need some kind of marked. We have been thinking about adding
Ditto - the main problem is that while we appreciate the important and
complementary roles of clinical terminology, information models and health
information exchange specifications (which should normally be created as
downstream artefacts from the broader whole of 'EHR' content models for the
4 matches
Mail list logo
