[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-30 Thread Sam Heard
[mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of William E Hammond Sent: Friday, 20 December 2002 11:19 PM To: Thomas Beale Cc: Ignacio Valdes; openehr-technical at openehr.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: Subject of care] We actually dealt with this topic at Duke in the OB system

[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-30 Thread Sam Heard
2002 7:57 PM To: openehr-technical at openehr.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: Subject of care] A foetus is tightly coupled to a mother, but is sufficiently distinct for there to be a need for a separate EHR under certain circumstances. What do you call certain circumstances ; anyway, the follow

[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-20 Thread William E Hammond
We actually dealt with this topic at Duke in the OB system in the early 1980s. We did create a record. One interesting problem was ghost pregnancies in which it appeared for a period of time to have two fetuses later to be one. Our actually execution turned out to not create the new baby

[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-19 Thread Sam Heard
Message- From: Thomas Beale [mailto:thomas at deepthought.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 19 December 2002 1:43 AM To: Sam Heard Cc: openehr-technical at openehr.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: Subject of care] I think that the only systematic approach is to make a new EHR for each genetically