Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-05 Thread Thomas Beale
Bert Verhees wrote: You refer to machine computer system interfaces and that these might be proprietary. Yes they could and will. But when the holy grail is about plug-and-play interoperability then these interfaces (archetypes) must be free to use. Gerard, how about SNOMED-tables,

Antw: Re: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-05 Thread Thomas Beale
Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote: www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related archetypes. unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the approach also in more technical way. Key is the

Antw: Re: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-05 Thread Tim Churches
Thomas Beale wrote: Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote: www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related archetypes. unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the approach also in more technical

{Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-03 Thread Thomas Beale
Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote: In een bericht met de datum 8-1-2006 21:31:57 West-Europa (standaardtijd), schrijft gfrer at luna.nl: Information is exchanged in communities.All clinical information belongs to the healthcare domain. When clinical concept models (Archetypes) are

{Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-03 Thread Sandrine VILLAEYS
Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au jeudi 4 mai 2006. Sandrine Villaeys

Antw: Re: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-03 Thread williamtfgoos...@cs.com
www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related archetypes. unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the approach also in more technical way. Key is the binding knowledge, variables, vocabulary,

Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-03 Thread Gerard Freriks
Dear William, My answer is: The moment clinical concepts as defined by groups of clinicians are proprietary it will be impossible to have any conversation. The moment clinical concepts as defined by groups of clinicians using archetypes it will be impossible to have any semantic

Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-03 Thread Bert Verhees
You refer to machine computer system interfaces and that these might be proprietary. Yes they could and will. But when the holy grail is about plug-and-play interoperability then these interfaces (archetypes) must be free to use. Gerard, how about SNOMED-tables, they are expensive, and many

Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-03 Thread Gerard Freriks
Bert, The example of SNOMED is a good one. Looking at SNOMED we must ask the question: Are words in a dictionary proprietary? Do we have to pay for the use of these words in our conversations? Of course the answer is: NO. We have to pay for the medium: the book, the CD-ROM, the application.

{Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-02 Thread Sandrine VILLAEYS
Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au jeudi 4 mai 2006. Sandrine Villaeys

{Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

2006-05-02 Thread williamtfgoos...@cs.com
In een bericht met de datum 8-1-2006 21:31:57 West-Europa (standaardtijd), schrijft gfrer at luna.nl: Information is exchanged in communities.All clinical information belongs to the healthcare domain. When clinical concept models (Archetypes) are expressed using an Open International