Christopher Feahr wrote:
Thomas,
Thank you for the detailed comments. You mentioned WHO as a possible
world health information authority, but have they done anything like
this?
actually I have to admit I was being a bit facetious suggesting WHO, but
then again, not sure how good the US-UN
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 11:17, Thomas Beale wrote:
we should always keep in mind this point, as a benchmark of privacy
management of elecrnic patient information - from the patient's point of
view, if they see their information escaping more easily than it does
now (due to beig stuck in
Christopher Feahr wrote:
Thomas,
You have described the situation succinctly with your statement: My
suspicion is that the gov has documented HIPAA as well as it can and is
letting the healthcare community tell it what it said.
I sense that our security experts are fairly happy with the HIPAA
To: lakewood at copper.net; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: Distributed Records - An approach
Thomas,
This sounds workable to me. If I am understanding you correctly, we
need one (and only one??) registry in which anyone, anywhere (who is
authorized, of course) could look up a patient
Service
-Original Message-
From: Tim Churches [mailto:tc...@optushome.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 06:49
To: Sam Heard
Cc: Christopher Feahr; lakewood at copper.net; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: RE: Distributed Records - An approach
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 06:06, Sam Heard
at swsahs.nsw.gov.au; 'Tim Churches'
tchur at optushome.com.au; Sam Heard sam.heard at bigpond.com
Cc: Christopher Feahr chris at optiserv.com; lakewood at copper.net;
openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: Distributed Records - An approach
Identification
at hcsystems.com; norbert Lipszyc
irl at club-internet.fr; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: Distributed Records - An approach
the control issue is an interesting one. In the US, it is generally
acknowledged that the patient owns the information
at openehr.org
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: Distributed Records - An approach
Thomas,
Your points are certainly well taken regarding qualified legal
assistance. WEDI-SNIP (http //www.wedi.org/snip/) is where the bulk of
the discussion is taking place regarding what
; Christopher Feahr chris at optiserv.com
Cc: Thomas Clark lakewood at copper.net
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Distributed Records - An approach
Hi Chris,
Unfortunately the uncertainty in the HIPAA environment at this time is
sufficient to cause large Providers, e.g., Kaiser
; lakewood at copper.net;
openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: Distributed Records - An approach
I have been reading these threads with interest over the last few days and
I
think the majority of the comments are extermely value and add
: Distributed Records - An approach
Thomas,
This sounds workable to me. If I am understanding you correctly, we
need one (and only one??) registry in which anyone, anywhere (who is
authorized, of course) could look up a patient and determine which
region had master control at the moment over his
: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: Distributed Records - An approach
The remarks of Christopher Feahr are very adequate, but they overlook the
fact that in many areas, patients will have the decision as to where they
want their records to be kept (trusted third parties for example
Hi All,
With a background in fault tolerant computing I have a built-in penchant for
distributed files that are exact/backup copies of a master. Works wonders
for
financial transactions.
I don't believe that this model fits EHRs especially since one can conceive
of
parallel, e.g., close
-
From: lakew...@copper.net
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:11 AM
Subject: Distributed Records - An approach
Hi All,
With a background in fault tolerant computing I have a built-in
penchant for
distributed files that are exact/backup copies of a master
14 matches
Mail list logo
