Paul Juarez wrote:
I've been following these discussions with a lot of interest. So I
guess it's time for me to put in my two bits. While I've seen a couple
of references to ownership of the medical record, I havent seen anything
definitive that defines it (e.g. patient, provider, legal
On 2003-04-29 3:44, Thomas Clark tclark at hcsystems.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
You are very right concerning the involvement of judges and attorneys. The
legal issues must be handled up front.
-Thomas Clark
Yes.
The problem is that in Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia, etc, there
Paul
I've been following these discussions with a lot of interest. So I guess
it's time for me to put in my two bits. While I've seen a couple of
references to ownership of the medical record, I havent seen anything
definitive that defines it (e.g. patient, provider, legal custiodian of
at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Bill Walton
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 6:03 AM
To: Paul Juarez; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: GEHR philosophical background info
Hi Paul,
I agree completely that the ownership question is fundamental. Until
recently I was under the mistaken
Maybe you don't know it, but since a law dated march 4th 2002, a french
citizen has
the right to access himself his complete medical record and to get a copy of
it without any kind of restrictions.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-Original Message-
From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
[mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Bill Walton
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 6:03 AM
To: Paul Juarez; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: GEHR philosophical background info
Hi
Subject: Re: GEHR philosophical background info
On 2003-04-29 3:44, Thomas Clark tclark at hcsystems.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
You are very right concerning the involvement of judges and attorneys.
The
legal issues must be handled up front.
-Thomas Clark
Yes.
The problem
Subject: Re: GEHR philosophical background info
Paul Juarez wrote:
I've been following these discussions with a lot of interest. So I
guess it's time for me to put in my two bits. While I've seen a couple
of references to ownership of the medical record, I havent seen anything
definitive
Hi Sam,
BW: This is a really interesting problem space to me. I've been studying
HIPAA (the Health care Information Portability and Accountability Act) and
have become fascinated with the discussion over how best to balance the
needs of the various parties involved in the provision
I've been following these discussions with a lot of interest. So I
guess it's time for me to put in my two bits. While I've seen a couple
of references to ownership of the medical record, I havent seen anything
definitive that defines it (e.g. patient, provider, legal custiodian of
record, etc.,
philosophical background info
I've been following these discussions with a lot of interest. So I guess
it's time for me to put in my two bits. While I've seen a couple of references
to ownership of the medical record, I havent seen anything definitive that
defines it (e.g. patient, provider, legal
: Monday, April 28, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: GEHR philosophical background info
I've been following these discussions with a lot of interest. So I
guess it's time for me to put in my two bits. While I've seen a couple
of references to ownership of the medical record, I havent seen anything
definitive
- Original Message -
From: Paul Juarez
To: bill.walton at jstats.com ; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: GEHR philosophical background info
Bill,
Without federal legislation or some consensus upon formally adapted
professional
13 matches
Mail list logo
