Hi,
That seems a good suggestion.
Gerard
--
--
Gerard Freriks, MD
Convenor CEN/TC251 WG1
TNO-PG
Zernikedreef 9
2333CK Leiden
The Netherlands
+31 71 5181388
+31 654 792800
On 11 Dec 2004, at 17:20, Thomas Beale wrote:
And our current suggestion (from Dipak Kalra and myself at least) is
lakewood at copper.net wrote:
Hi All,
Handling data streams and derivations at points in time is analogous
to Software Configuration
Management where branches are necessary and having multiple groups
operating upon the
same branches, and special code, must be synchronized and ultimately
wow, wow!
GF
-- private --
Gerard Freriks, arts
Huigsloterdijk 378
2158 LR Buitenkaag
The Netherlands
+31 252 544896
+31 654 792800
On 07 Dec 2004, at 06:46, Sam Heard wrote:
Bye the way.
What types of standardized proto-Archetypes will we need?
There are some interesting ones
Bill and all
This is a very important consideration and one that we need to get right for
lots of reasons.
Tom has been proposing an aggregation approach - allowing us to find all data
that relates to something - a disease, care at an institution etc.
It is clear that there are aspects of
Sam,
Is it correct to say that:
- Each type of Episode will be an specific Archetype that maps
starting at the folder.
- What must be communicable generically is the disease type Episode
since this can be true in many places.
- The Non-disease Archetypes are based on local business rules and
Hi,
On 06 Dec 2004, at 09:10, lakewood at copper.net wrote:
An episode at age 10 is not likely to be important at age 30, 40 or
beyond.
?!
An episode of appendicitis at 10,
an episode where the spleen is removed,
an episode of leukemia at 10,
all are more or less very important,
when
Gerard Freriks wrote:
Dear all,
Am I correct to conclude and propose that:
- *episode:* situation considered to occupy a time interval
- there are at least 4 context's in which the term 'Episode' is defined:
disease related (point of view of the patient),
this kind of episode often has
Thom,
It seems we are in agreement.
Gerard
-- private --
Gerard Freriks, arts
Huigsloterdijk 378
2158 LR Buitenkaag
The Netherlands
+31 252 544896
+31 654 792800
On 04 Dec 2004, at 12:54, Thomas Beale wrote:
Gerard Freriks wrote:
Dear all,
Am I correct to conclude and propose that:
-
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Beale wrote:
Someone could come along later in the same
institution, and define a new kind of episode, and
retrospectively create all the Folders for that kind
of episode in certain EHRs. This also won't
change any of the underlying data. Episode
Folders could also be
The disease episode is about the patient and can and will be exchanged.
Other episodes defined on the basis of local business rules will not be
exchanged.
GF
--
--
Gerard Freriks, MD
Convenor CEN/TC251 WG1
TNO-PG
Zernikedreef 9
2333CK Leiden
The Netherlands
+31 71 5181388
+31 654 792800
:* owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
[mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Beale
*Sent:* Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:36 AM
*To:* Openehr-Technical
*Subject:* Modelling Episodes in openEHR
Dear all,
the definitional debate about what an episode
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20041202/8bc8b1de/attachment.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
