On 02/09/2013 20:28, Bert Verhees wrote:
> Op 02-09-13 16:54, Thomas Beale schreef:
>> you might want to consider posting these issues on the Java list,
>> you'll probably get more answers there... not everyone bothers to
>> read all messages on this list if they are busy
> Thanks Thomas, I forgo
Op 02-09-13 16:54, Thomas Beale schreef:
> you might want to consider posting these issues on the Java list,
> you'll probably get more answers there... not everyone bothers to read
> all messages on this list if they are busy
Thanks Thomas, I forgot there was a Java-list. There hasn't been much
Bert,
Re: the 'units' problem, see my answer previously posted:
>
> Treating "units" etc as keywords is a pretty dirty way to implement
> dADL (now ODIN) parsing! The property names in a C_DV_QUANTITY (or
> C_DV_ORDINAL) structure shouldn't be keywords, they are just property
> names, and shou
LinkEHR writes an archetypenode id in a use_node, the Java ADL-parser
regards this as erroneous, although it is permitted in the AOM, where
there is an nodeId in the ArchetypeInternalRef constructor.
The repair in adl.jj was, however simply to do. I tested it with all
available testfiles, and a
4 matches
Mail list logo