concerning adl-parser

2013-09-03 Thread Thomas Beale
On 02/09/2013 20:28, Bert Verhees wrote: > Op 02-09-13 16:54, Thomas Beale schreef: >> you might want to consider posting these issues on the Java list, >> you'll probably get more answers there... not everyone bothers to >> read all messages on this list if they are busy > Thanks Thomas, I forgo

concerning adl-parser

2013-09-02 Thread Bert Verhees
Op 02-09-13 16:54, Thomas Beale schreef: > you might want to consider posting these issues on the Java list, > you'll probably get more answers there... not everyone bothers to read > all messages on this list if they are busy Thanks Thomas, I forgot there was a Java-list. There hasn't been much

concerning adl-parser

2013-09-02 Thread Thomas Beale
Bert, Re: the 'units' problem, see my answer previously posted: > > Treating "units" etc as keywords is a pretty dirty way to implement > dADL (now ODIN) parsing! The property names in a C_DV_QUANTITY (or > C_DV_ORDINAL) structure shouldn't be keywords, they are just property > names, and shou

concerning adl-parser

2013-09-02 Thread Bert Verhees
LinkEHR writes an archetypenode id in a use_node, the Java ADL-parser regards this as erroneous, although it is permitted in the AOM, where there is an nodeId in the ArchetypeInternalRef constructor. The repair in adl.jj was, however simply to do. I tested it with all available testfiles, and a