Hi,
I am sorry, but I am to busy to read all the discussions on future
ADL-versions.
So, now I have a small question, which possible is already explained,
Is it possible to write conditional constraints in future ADL?
The question is about implementing care-protocol into an archetype.
For
he object model will be what you would expect from that.
- thomas
On 10/03/2011 15:48, Bert Verhees wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry, but I am to busy to read all the discussions on future
> ADL-versions.
> So, now I have a small question, which possible is already explained,
>
> I
being finalised, but the general syntax will look
> like Xpath and the object model will be what you would expect from that.
>
> - thomas
>
> On 10/03/2011 15:48, Bert Verhees wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sorry, but I am to busy to read all the discussions on future
>&g
like
>> ? ? ? ? ? o $current_date
>> ? ? ? ? ? o $current_time
>>
>> Some of this is still being finalised, but the general syntax will look
>> like Xpath and the object model will be what you would expect from that.
>>
>> - thomas
>>
>> On 10/03/2
AM
> To: For openEHR technical discussions
> Subject: Re: future ADL-versions
>
> Greetings,
> I have a single question about this particular requirement/idea: why?
>
> Archetypes are model artefacts. That is it. They are supposed to
> describe domain models in a certain wa
1 10:03 AM
>> To: For openEHR technical discussions
>> Subject: Re: future ADL-versions
>>
>> Greetings,
>> I have a single question about this particular requirement/idea: why?
>>
>> Archetypes are model artefacts. That is it. They are supposed to
>> descr
enehr.org] On Behalf Of Seref Arikan
>> Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2011 10:03 AM
>> To: For openEHR technical discussions
>> Subject: Re: future ADL-versions
>>
>> Greetings,
>> I have a single question about this particular requirement/idea: why?
>>
>
same conditional constraint requirement in an integration scenario).
>>
>> Heath
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-
>>> bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Seref Arikan
>>&g
integration scenario).
>>>
>>> Heath
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-
>>>> bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Seref Arikan
>>>> Sent: Wednesda
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:42, Seref Arikan <
serefarikan at kurumsalteknoloji.com> wrote:
> I'll repeat it again, if someone is interested in
> developing a formalism using constraint based expressions of ADL, to
> model GUI/behaviour/etc, there is nothing wrong with that. Just do it
> out
rement in an integration scenario).
>>>>
>>>> Heath
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-
>>>>> bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Seref A
finalised, so don't depend on it;
>>> however it is the left hand side that matters, i.e.
>>> $date_of_birth
>>> * environmental values, like
>>>o $current_date
>>>o $current_time
>>&
* elements in data elsewhere in the same EHR like:
>>>>>o $date_of_birth:ISO8601_DATE ::= query(?ehr?,
>>>>> ?date_of_birth?)
>>>>>o this is still being finalised, so don't depend on it;
>>>>> however it is
The need to express things like the Barthel sum of scores, or other
multi-attribute constraints is already part of ADL. It is not yet well
supported in tools, but it is parsed in at least the ADL Workbench. As I
said before the language of these expressions is pretty close to Xpath,
partly bas
On 23/03/2011 11:41, Bert Verhees wrote:
> The idea is to implement guideline/rules etc in Archetypes.
> In this way you can force software to look at some conditions if some
> other conditions are met.
>
> As I gave an example: If bloodpressure> value -->> also look at heartbeat.
this kind of t
Sounds reasonable,
thanks
Bert
Op 23-03-11 13:00, Thomas Beale schreef:
> On 23/03/2011 11:41, Bert Verhees wrote:
>> The idea is to implement guideline/rules etc in Archetypes.
>> In this way you can force software to look at some conditions if some
>> other conditions are met.
>>
>> As I gave a
/value>
>>>>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/path/to/diastolic/pressure/value
>>>>>> ? ? ?* elements in data elsewhere in the same EHR like:
>>>>>> ? ? ? ? ? ?o $date_of_birth:ISO8601_DATE ::= query(?ehr?,
>>>>>> ?date_of_birth?)
>>>>>&
e: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:00:57 +
From: thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: future ADL-versions
On 23/03/2011 11:41, Bert Verhees wrote:
The idea is to implement guideline/rules etc in Archetypes.
In this way you
---
> *From:* openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
> [openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale
> [thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, 26 March 2011 2:05 a.m.
> *To:* openehr-technical at openehr.org
&
Hi!
Yesterday I asked if anybody had any motivated objections to using the
openEHR template formalism as a layer to catch some GUI-hints/rules. I bring
it up again to get some response :-)
The point to have separate concerns in separate artifacts is often good.
Regarding GUI-hints it seems reason
: http://twitter.com/ppazos
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:05:49 +0100
Subject: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)
From: erik.sundv...@liu.se
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Hi!
Yesterday I asked if anybody had any motivated objections to using the openEHR
template formalism as a
or openEHR technical discussions
Subject: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)
Hi!
Yesterday I asked if anybody had any motivated objections to using the openEHR
template formalism as a layer to catch some GUI-hints/rules. I bring it up
again to get some response :-)
The point to hav
chnical at openehr.org
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:05:22 +1300
Subject: RE: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)
Hi Eric, good points...As you may remember we had this discussion on this list
not so long ago and I don?t remember any action taken after that. I guess we
should take lead and co
echnical at openehr.org
> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:05:22 +1300
> Subject: RE: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)
>
> Hi Eric, good points...As you may remember we had this discussion on this
> list not so long ago and I don?t remember any action taken after that. I
>
om/in/pablopazosgutierrez
Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos
> From: yampeku at gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:32:41 +0900
> Subject: Re: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)
> To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
>
>
On 25/03/2011 03:05, Koray Atalag wrote:
>
> Hi Eric, good points...As you may remember we had this discussion on
> this list not so long ago and I don't remember any action taken after
> that. I guess we should take lead and come up with some proposal.
> Perhaps it'd be good to have a wiki spac
r.org
Subject: Re: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)
On 25/03/2011 03:05, Koray Atalag wrote:
Hi Eric, good points...As you may remember we had this discussion on this list
not so long ago and I don?t remember any action taken after that. I guess we
should take lead and come up
27 matches
Mail list logo
