Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:28 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:34:23PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:04:50AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >... > > > > I think we should put in plan for 2.8 and

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:34:23PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:04:50AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >... > > > I think we should put in plan for 2.8 and define the scope, since we > > > are switching > > > poky

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:34 PM Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:04:50AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:59 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31:25AM -0700,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3 1/2] local.conf.sample: make systemd as default init manager

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:23 PM Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Khem Raj > > Sent: den 23 maj 2019 22:59 > > To: Peter Kjellerstedt > > Cc: kai.k...@windriver.com; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; > > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: avoid musl specific patches affect glibc systems

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:14 PM Martin Jansa wrote: > > It's still nicer to have > SRC_URI_append_libc-musl = " ${SRC_URI_MUSL}" > if the intermediate SRC_URI_MUSL variable is useful. yeah we can do away with this one variable here. > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:59 PM Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:04:50AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:59 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31:25AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:27 AM Adrian Bunk

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3 1/2] local.conf.sample: make systemd as default init manager

2019-05-24 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: Khem Raj > Sent: den 23 maj 2019 22:59 > To: Peter Kjellerstedt > Cc: kai.k...@windriver.com; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3 1/2] local.conf.sample: make systemd as >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: avoid musl specific patches affect glibc systems

2019-05-24 Thread Martin Jansa
It's still nicer to have SRC_URI_append_libc-musl = " ${SRC_URI_MUSL}" if the intermediate SRC_URI_MUSL variable is useful. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:59 PM Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 10:17 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] alsa-utils: fix multilib names

2019-05-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 18:18 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 15:19 +0200, Ming Liu wrote: > > Wouldn't that break the alsa-utils-scripts? Since ALSA_UTILS_PKGS is > > being depended by both alsa-utils and alsa-utils-scripts. > > > > I did that in V1, but as Richard Purdie

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:04:50AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:59 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31:25AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:27 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:59 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31:25AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:27 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On 5/24/19 3:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > On

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31:25AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:27 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 5/24/19 3:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:16:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: avoid musl specific patches affect glibc systems

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:31 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 10:17 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > > systemd upstream only care about glibc. We made musl specific > > patches so that systemd could work. But currently these patches > > contain potential security issues. > > > > So

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: avoid musl specific patches affect glibc systems

2019-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 10:17 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > systemd upstream only care about glibc. We made musl specific > patches so that systemd could work. But currently these patches > contain potential security issues. > > So apply these patches only when the libc is musl. > > Signed-off-by: Chen

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:27 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > On 5/24/19 3:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:16:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > ... > > > > but I think dropping > > > > systemd support

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4] python*-setuptools: add separate packages for pkg_resources module

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:58 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 19:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 5:36 AM < > > luca.bocca...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > From: Luca Boccassi < > > > luca.bocca...@microsoft.com > > > > > > > > > > The pkg_resources Python

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] make-mod-scripts: Add nostamp flag on configure task

2019-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 13:49 +0800, Haiqing Bai wrote: > Error appears while building out of tree kernel module > after recompiling the kernel: > bitbake -c cleanall/cleansstate virtual/kernel > bitbake -c cleanall/cleansstate hello-mod > bitbake virtual/kernel > bitbake hello-mod > > ERROR:

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 5/24/19 3:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:16:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > ... > > > but I think dropping > > > systemd support completely from musl is not an option I would like to go > > > with,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] alsa-utils: fix multilib names

2019-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 15:19 +0200, Ming Liu wrote: > Wouldn't that break the alsa-utils-scripts? Since ALSA_UTILS_PKGS is > being depended by both alsa-utils and alsa-utils-scripts. > > I did that in V1, but as Richard Purdie pointed out, it will break > the alsa-utils-scripts build. I was about

[OE-core] [PATCH] qemu: Backport the arm segfault fix

2019-05-24 Thread Alistair Francis
When we updated to QEMU 4.0 we saw a segfault when running tests on the qemuarm machine. At the time we just reverted the offending patch from QEMU. Now that the fix has been merged into upstream let's remove that revert patch and replace it with the correct backport. Signed-off-by: Alistair

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] nginx: fix kill path in nginx systemd unit file

2019-05-24 Thread akuster808
On 5/24/19 7:36 AM, Nicola Lunghi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi > --- > meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/files/nginx.service | 2 +- > meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx.inc | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Wrong mailing list. please send

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-webserver][PATCH 1/2] nginx: update to version 1.17.0

2019-05-24 Thread Randy MacLeod
Nicola, Please re-send to: openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org rather than: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Did you read: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded If so maybe we need to improve the howto. Thanks. ../Randy On 5/24/19 10:44

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Khem Raj
On 5/24/19 3:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:16:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: ... but I think dropping systemd support completely from musl is not an option I would like to go with, there are cases where this makes sense. Especially when you have to cater to different set

[OE-core] [PATCH] mdadm: use ${systemd_unitdir} rather than /lib/systemd

2019-05-24 Thread luca . boccassi
From: Luca Boccassi Fixes build with usrmerge enabled. Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi --- meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.1.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.1.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.1.bb index

[OE-core] [oe][meta-webserver][PATCH 1/2] nginx: update to version 1.17.0

2019-05-24 Thread Nicola Lunghi
Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi --- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx_1.15.7.bb | 6 -- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx_1.17.0.bb | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx_1.15.7.bb create mode

[OE-core] [oe][meta-webserver][PATCH 2/2] nginx: update stable version to 1.16.0

2019-05-24 Thread Nicola Lunghi
Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi --- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx_1.14.2.bb | 10 -- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx_1.16.0.bb | 10 ++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx_1.14.2.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH] pinentry: Switch pinentry-qt from Qt4 to Qt5

2019-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- meta/recipes-support/pinentry/pinentry_1.1.0.bb | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/pinentry/pinentry_1.1.0.bb b/meta/recipes-support/pinentry/pinentry_1.1.0.bb index 4116efc76f..fb529d25d6 100644 ---

[OE-core] [oe][meta-webserver][PATCH] nginx: fix kill path in nginx systemd unit file

2019-05-24 Thread Nicola Lunghi
Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi --- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/files/nginx.service | 2 +- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx.inc | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/files/nginx.service

[OE-core] [PATCH] nginx: fix kill path in nginx systemd unit file

2019-05-24 Thread Nicola Lunghi
Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi --- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/files/nginx.service | 2 +- meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/nginx.inc | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/nginx/files/nginx.service

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] alsa-utils: fix multilib names

2019-05-24 Thread Ming Liu
Wouldn't that break the alsa-utils-scripts? Since ALSA_UTILS_PKGS is being depended by both alsa-utils and alsa-utils-scripts. I did that in V1, but as Richard Purdie pointed out, it will break the alsa-utils-scripts build. //Ming Liu Burton, Ross 於 2019年5月24日 週五 下午2:42寫道: > On Fri, 24 May

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] alsa-utils: fix multilib names

2019-05-24 Thread Burton, Ross
On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 07:38, wrote: > -SUMMARY_alsa-utils-alsabat = "Command-line sound tester for ALSA sound > card driver" > +SUMMARY_${MLPREFIX}alsa-utils-alsabat = "Command-line sound tester for > ALSA sound card driver" Why not replace alsa-utils-alsabat with ${PN}-alsabat?

Re: [OE-core] Switching GStreamer recipes from autotools to meson

2019-05-24 Thread Carlos Rafael Giani
Yes, I am preparing recipes for that, based on the work from Philippe Normand . On 20.05.19 19:49, Khem Raj wrote: On 5/14/19 1:19 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:  From what I have seen, meson support is stable now. Also, in GStreamer, autotools is now considered a legacy build system, and

Re: [OE-core] Should systemd be marked as incompatible with musl?

2019-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:16:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >... > but I think dropping > systemd support completely from musl is not an option I would like to go > with, there are cases where this makes sense. Especially when you have to > cater to different set of devices from small to big,

[OE-core] [PATCH V2] alsa-utils: fix multilib names

2019-05-24 Thread liu . ming50
From: Ming Liu Append ${MLPREFIX} to the 'alsa-utils' names, or else it would fail with multilib build. Signed-off-by: Ming Liu --- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.9.bb | 66 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH] make-mod-scripts: Add nostamp flag on configure task

2019-05-24 Thread Haiqing Bai
Error appears while building out of tree kernel module after recompiling the kernel: bitbake -c cleanall/cleansstate virtual/kernel bitbake -c cleanall/cleansstate hello-mod bitbake virtual/kernel bitbake hello-mod ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid. include/generated/autoconf.h or