Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base.bbclass: fix COMPATIBLE_MACHINE

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 07:14:56AM -0700, Robert Yang wrote: > It mismatched such as qemux86 and qemux86-64 which was incorrect, for > example: > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86)" That will match qemux86 and qemux86-64 and is by design! It's a regular expression, not an exact string match! There

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image_types: use compress framework to produce checksums for images

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Alexander Kanevskiy wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Alexander D. Kanevskiy

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: re-do find/ls code to not fail on filenames with spaces

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> --- ...re-do-find-ls-code-to-not-fail-on-filenam.patch | 56 ++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb | 3 +- 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [jethro][fido][PATCH] openssl: Security fix CVE-2016-0800

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:02:38AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 3/4/16 10:51 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:46:01AM -0800, akuster wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 03/04/2016 07:39 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar

Re: [OE-core] [jethro][fido][PATCH] openssl: Security fix CVE-2016-0800

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:46:01AM -0800, akuster wrote: > > > On 03/04/2016 07:39 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:37:21PM -0800, Armin Kuster wrote: > >> From: Armin Kuster <akus...@mvista.com> > >> > >> CVE-2016-0800 S

Re: [OE-core] [jethro][fido][PATCH] openssl: Security fix CVE-2016-0800

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:37:21PM -0800, Armin Kuster wrote: > From: Armin Kuster > > CVE-2016-0800 SSL/TLS: Cross-protocol attack on TLS using SSLv2 (DROWN) > > https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster > --- >

Re: [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another > change > coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on > supported minimum > kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:20:23AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > > > > A clean room re-implementation and extensi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:18:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:01:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > > A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. > > > > What's the rationale for adding this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:01:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> > > > > A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress t

[OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> --- meta/recipes-extended/stress-ng/stress-ng_0.05.09.bb | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:36:02PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > > > On 01/26/2016 11:34 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> > > > >A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. > > > >S

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] wayland: upgrade 1.8.1 -> 1.9.0

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> * The license was updated from MIT X11 to MIT Expat. * always-build-scanner.patch was accepted upstream. * disable-macro-checks-not-used-for-scanner.patch is no longer needed with the new --disable-libraries flag. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyen

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] weston: upgrade 1.8.0 -> 1.9.0

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> * The license was updated from MIT X11 to MIT Expat * parallelmake.patch was accepted upstream. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> --- .../wayland/weston/parallelmake.patch | 40 -- .../wayland/{wes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel: Add support for multiple kernel packages

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:02:44PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Haris Okanovic > > wrote: > > > >> From: Gratian Crisan

[OE-core] OpenEmbedded e.V. Technical Steering Committee Elections

://openembedded.org/wiki/Organization -- Denys Dmytriyenko OpenEmbedded e.V. Board of Directors -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cryptodev-tests: don't use STAGING_KERNEL_DIR, fix re-packaging in multi-machine builds

Ping. Any comments? On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:05:19PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev/cryptodev-tests_1.6.bb | 2 +- > 1 file chang

Re: [OE-core] oprofile rebuilds for different MACHINES (sstate)

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:35:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > > > So, I've been debugging the issue of oprofile rebuilding from one MACHINE to > > another (causing PR issues,

[OE-core] [PATCH] cryptodev-tests: don't use STAGING_KERNEL_DIR, fix re-packaging in multi-machine builds

From: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> --- meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev/cryptodev-tests_1.6.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev/cryptodev-tests_1.6.bb b/meta/re

[OE-core] [PATCH] kselftests: add 4.1 version of Kernel Selftest suite

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/recipes-kernel/kselftests/kselftests_4.1.bb | 86 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/kselftests/kselftests_4.1.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes

[OE-core] oprofile rebuilds for different MACHINES (sstate)

So, I've been debugging the issue of oprofile rebuilding from one MACHINE to another (causing PR issues, etc). I was able to trace it down to this line: EXTRA_OECONF = --with-kernel=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} --without-x ac_cv_prog_XSLTPROC= And STAGING_KERNEL_DIR resolves to this:

Re: [OE-core] OpenEmbedded e.V. membership status announcement

Cliff Brake Joshua Lock Michael Lauer Tom King Tom Rini === -- Denys Dmytriyenko OpenEmbedded e.V. Board of Directors On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:27:11PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: All, In accordance with OpenEmbedded e.V. statutes, members that were absent from

Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/1] Backport BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS fix from master/dizzy

I know Daisy is rather old, but is there any chance to get this fix pulled in? Or should I look for a local workaround instead? Thanks! -- Denys On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:07:54PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com This is a self-contained clean backport

[OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/1] Backport BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS fix from master/dizzy

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com This is a self-contained clean backport of BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS fix for opkg. Please consider applying to daisy. Paul Barker (1): package_manager: Fix BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS for opkg meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions

[OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 1/1] package_manager: Fix BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS for opkg

-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com (From oe-core master rev: 3fa24eee41c26fecd5e4f680082288ec772d2de9) Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py b/meta/lib/oe

Re: [OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:26:15AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 09:36:01AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 17:09 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: weston-init RDEPENDS on weston and kbd. $ bitbake-diffsigs 1.0-r0

Re: [OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:31:37PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:12:43PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: Am 02.05.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Andrea Adami: On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: Has anyone ever seen this message during

Re: [OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:28:52PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:31:37PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:12:43PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: Am 02.05.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Andrea Adami: On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Denys

Re: [OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:12:43PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: Am 02.05.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Andrea Adami: On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: Has anyone ever seen this message during image.do_rootfs task? Collected errors: * opkg_install_pkg

Re: [OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:50:17PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:13:05PM -0500, Alejandro del Castillo wrote: On 05/01/2015 11:06 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: Hi, Has anyone ever seen this message during image.do_rootfs task? Collected errors

Re: [OE-core] OpenEmbedded e.V. membership status announcement

really work, at least for me. Regards, Andreas On 05.05.2015 00:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: All, In accordance with OpenEmbedded e.V. statutes, members that were absent from two or more consecutive annual General Assembly meetings and didn't have anyone representing them

[OE-core] OpenEmbedded e.V. membership status announcement

Michael Lauer Michael Smith Philip Blundell Phillip Zabel Robert Schuster Roman I Khimov Steve Sakoman Tom King Tom Rini Yu Ke Yury Bushmelev === Please let us know of any concerns or comments. Thanks. -- Denys Dmytriyenko OpenEmbedded e.V. Board of Directors

Re: [OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:13:05PM -0500, Alejandro del Castillo wrote: On 05/01/2015 11:06 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: Hi, Has anyone ever seen this message during image.do_rootfs task? Collected errors: * opkg_install_pkg: Package package md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg

[OE-core] opkg_install_pkg: Package name md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt.

Hi, Has anyone ever seen this message during image.do_rootfs task? Collected errors: * opkg_install_pkg: Package package md5sum mismatch. Either the opkg or the package index are corrupt. Try 'opkg update'. * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package package. We started seeing it on random

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] security_flags.inc: elfutils on ARM fails with PIE flags

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com The error messages look like this: R_ARM_TLS_LE32 relocation not permitted in shared object Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] security_flags.inc: disable PIE for bash due to issues in mkbuiltins

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com As bash builds a native tool called mkbuiltins, it fails with PIE flags: ld: mkbuiltins.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.8' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Affects at least version 3.2 of bash. Signed-off

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- v2 - explicitly depend u-boot-mkimage-native on openssl-native .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch | 36 ++ ...utils_2014.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2015.01.bb} | 21

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:06:48PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:59:09PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 29 January 2015 at 19:33, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: I believe I had that in DEPENDS... I'll check. So, yes, the patch does have

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:17:55PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Hello Ross, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 10 February 2015 at 16:02, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: +DEPENDS = openssl +DEPENDS_class-native = openssl-native

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:16:00PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: Hi Denys, On 10 February 2015 at 16:02, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: +DEPENDS = openssl +DEPENDS_class-native = openssl-native That *really* shouldn't be required. :( And indeed, the old patch with -e shows

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:48:51PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 10 February 2015 at 16:38, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: ? Are you saying it's meta-fsl-ppc specific issue? I just replicated with qemuarm and interestingly with zero tasks happening at the same time. I'm

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- v3 - pass CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to EXTRA_OEMAKE of all tools, pass V=1 everywhere for meaningful logs, native CFLAGS has -isystem pointing to correct sysroot .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch

Re: [OE-core] OpenEmbedded Developer America's Meeting

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:27:23PM -0500, Philip Balister wrote: We've scheduled a meeting in San Jose at a Monte Vista facility for Correction, it's MontaVista with an 'a': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MontaVista Do you have an address of said facility? March 27-28. This is after ELC (also

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

I believe I had that in DEPENDS... I'll check. -- Denys On Jan 29, 2015 8:19 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:On 23 January 2015 at 22:40, Denys Dmytriyenko denis@denix.org wrote: rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2014.07.bb = u-boot-mkimage_2015.01.bb} (45%)u-book

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 09:07:29AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: I believe I had that in DEPENDS... I'll check. So, yes, the patch does have DEPENDS = openssl Does it become openssl-native due to BBCLASSEXTEND = native? Or do I need a separate DEPENDS_class-native? -- Denys On Jan

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:59:09PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 29 January 2015 at 19:33, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: I believe I had that in DEPENDS... I'll check. So, yes, the patch does have DEPENDS = openssl Does it become openssl-native due to BBCLASSEXTEND

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

Any feedback so far? On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:40:18PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- v2 - rebase on top of fw-utils combining patch from Otavio .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- v2 - rebase on top of fw-utils combining patch from Otavio .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch | 36 ++ ...utils_2014.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2015.01.bb} | 21

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix the cross build

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:55:07PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:18:27PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: This merges the u-boot-fw-utils-cross into the main u-boot-fw-utils recipe and fixes the build failure seen since 2014.07 update. So, the actual fix

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 02:12:30PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:20:05PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 06:11:23PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Jan 21

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:40:43PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:02:06PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 22 January 2015 at 14:57, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: Please note

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:02:06PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 22 January 2015 at 14:57, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: Please note that he's talking about current 2014.07 version, not the update! Can you confirm that it works or fails on the autobuilder? Sorry, got lost

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:23:16PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:50:28AM -0200, Raphael Philipe wrote: Hey Denys, I tested u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2014.07.bb in Ubuntu 12.04 and got the same error . Can you confirm that this recipe works for you? Ok, trying

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix the cross build

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:18:27PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: This merges the u-boot-fw-utils-cross into the main u-boot-fw-utils recipe and fixes the build failure seen since 2014.07 update. So, the actual fix is to drop unnecessary EXTRA_OEMAKE that you had there from the beginning of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:20:05PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 06:11:23PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:17:19AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Tue, Jan 13

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:50:28AM -0200, Raphael Philipe wrote: Hey Denys, I tested u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2014.07.bb in Ubuntu 12.04 and got the same error . Can you confirm that this recipe works for you? Ok, trying to bisect the breakage of the current 2014.07 version of fw-utils-cross

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:17:19AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com ... +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils/0001-tools

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4 1/2] uboot-config.bbclass: Allow multiple U-Boot config for machine

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:32:35AM +0800, Chunrong Guo wrote: This adds support to build multiple U-Boot configs for a machine; this is useful when we have support for different media boots which require different U-Boot configuration (e.g: eMMC and NAND). Any examples how to use this?

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2015.01.bb, do_compile On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:17:19AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 06:11:23PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:17:19AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: From: Denys

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 06:31:32PM -0200, Raphael Philipe wrote: I just checked 2014.07, and it does not work too. Same output. Sorry,am I missing something? Looks like host-specific issue - it calls HOSTCC in there. On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

Ping. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:09:51AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- ...2014.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2015.01.bb} | 11 --- .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch | 36

[OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2015.01

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- ...2014.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2015.01.bb} | 11 --- .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch | 36 ++ ...utils_2014.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2015.01.bb} | 12

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] u-boot-mkimage: allow building target version of the tool

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:12:36PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com u-boot doesn't really support building its tools for the target, as they are built with HOSTCC compiler, which

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:56:23PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 14 September 2014 04:34, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com * Update U-boot and corresponding tools to version 2014.07 * Small cleanups with indentation and consolidation of u

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:09:51PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 5 November 2014 14:56, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: | scripts/basic/fixdep: 1: scripts/basic/fixdep: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting )) The autobuilder failed with a more obvious error (and also has

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:43:38PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 7 November 2014 19:41, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: | scripts/basic/fixdep: 1: scripts/basic/fixdep: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting )) I suspect the real problem is: $ file fixdep fixdep

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:54:45PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:43:38PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 7 November 2014 19:41, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: | scripts/basic/fixdep: 1: scripts/basic/fixdep: Syntax error: word unexpected

[OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] u-boot-mkimage: allow building target version of the tool

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com u-boot doesn't really support building its tools for the target, as they are built with HOSTCC compiler, which is also used to compile fixdep utility that gets executed during the build. Since it might be beneficial to have a target version of mkimage, let's

Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 1/3] layer.conf: Add in useradd dependencies as ABISAFE dependencies

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: Currently allarch recipes using useradd rebuild each time MACHINE changes which is not desireable. Adding the useradd dependencies to this list ensures they do not change under these circumstances. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 1/3] layer.conf: Add in useradd dependencies as ABISAFE dependencies

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:25:57PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: This line above has a very long trail of whitespaces and it got commited that way, unfortunately :( Better was if you commented before it went

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: use one package split for all firmware filename extensions

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 01:08:55PM +0200, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: Signed-off-by: Carlos Rafael Giani d...@pseudoterminal.org --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 9/9] beaglebone.conf: add IMAGE_BOOT_FILES

maciek.borze...@gmail.com Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com But meta-yocto-bsp is not part of openembedded-core... --- meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebone.conf | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebone.conf b/meta-yocto-bsp/conf

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] wayland: update version to 1.6.0

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{wayland_1.5.0.bb = wayland_1.6.0.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{wayland_1.5.0.bb = wayland_1.6.0.bb} (92

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] libinput: add 0.6.0 version

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com libinput is an optional dependency for Weston to handle input devices externally, which provides better support especially for touch devices. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/libinput_0.6.0.bb | 14

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

Just to confirm - this patch was purposefully skipped in this merge cycle, right? On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:10:01PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- ...h-Add-use-DEFAULT_LINUX_BOOT_ENV-environm.patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] libinput: add 0.6.0 version

delayed for few hours... -- Denys On 23 September 2014 20:31, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com libinput is an optional dependency for Weston to handle input devices externally, which provides better support especially for touch devices

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] weston: update to version 1.6.0, add libinput PACKAGECONFIG

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{weston_1.5.0.bb = weston_1.6.0.bb} | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/{weston_1.5.0.bb = weston_1.6.0.bb} (93

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:31:43PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: On 23 September 2014 21:27, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: Just to confirm - this patch was purposefully skipped in this merge cycle, right? Yes. Pending a good rationale for why to break the freeze for u-boot

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] u-boot: cleanup indentation and consolidate .inc file

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 01:07:11AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: On 17 September 2014 00:10, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb @@ -1,25 +1,9 @@ require u-boot.inc -# To build u-boot

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] u-boot: cleanup indentation and consolidate .inc file

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- .../u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2013.07.bb| 12 ++-- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 14 +++--- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 12

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:41:22AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 15 September 2014 15:33, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: I think it is a way better base for work but I really don't care as I use

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- ...h-Add-use-DEFAULT_LINUX_BOOT_ENV-environm.patch | 74 -- ...2013.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2014.07.bb} | 10 +-- ...utils_2013.07.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2014.07.bb} | 10

[OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com * Update U-boot and corresponding tools to version 2014.07 * Small cleanups with indentation and consolidation of u-boot.inc Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- ...h-Add-use-DEFAULT_LINUX_BOOT_ENV-environm.patch | 74

Re: [OE-core] Race condition when building external kernel modules

Hi, This report is exactly from 3 years ago. Has this ever been resolved or looked at? We have started seeing this a lot lately in our own distro based on Daisy with 3.14 kernel when building with 12-24 threads. But it might not be release specific or even OE specifig... All the same symptoms

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:38:41AM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:30:04AM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 07/14/2014 07:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard

Re: [OE-core] UBI filesystem creation fails silently with 4k erase size

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:06:31PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: On 07/14/2014 02:07 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: I have a NOR chip that reports a 4k erase size, so in my machine.conf I entered: MKUBIFS_ARGS = -m 1 -e 3968 -c 7040 UBINIZE_ARGS = -m 1 -p 4096 UBI_VOLNAME = qspi-rootfs

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:30:04AM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 07/14/2014 07:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions

[OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Make probing of platform bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS variable from /etc/default/udev-cache on subsequent boots when udev cache is used. PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS has to be set to yes in order to force probing on every boot, otherwise it uses the old

[OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 2/2] udev-cache.default: set PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS to yes by default

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Force probing of platform bus by default. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org [Backport from OE-Core/master 6aae37c66fb6e7153b829ad860b7e7f94e804bd4] Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) -- Denys

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 01:13:38PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:53:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Make probing of platform bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel-module-split: Add support for KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD and KERNEL_MODULE_PROBECONF

Sorry for the delay... On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:46:58PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:53 +, Hart, Darren wrote: Adding Scott R. I do need to sort out a documentation update. I was just looking into that. It appears the ref-manual.html is the place to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:53:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Make probing of platform bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS variable from /etc/default/udev-cache on subsequent boots when udev cache is used. PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS has to be set

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] udev: update init script for conditional probing of platform bus

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Make probing of platform bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS variable from /etc/default/udev-cache on subsequent boots when udev cache is used. PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS has to be set to yes in order to force probing on every boot, otherwise it uses the old

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] udev-cache.default: set PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS to yes by default

From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com Force probing of platform bus by default. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com --- meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/udev-cache.default | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/udev-cache.default b/meta/recipes-core

[OE-core] textinfo failure

Hi, The recent texinfo change now breaks at least bison-native for me: | Traceback (most recent call last): | File /OE/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/texinfo-dummy-native/makeinfo, line 109, in module | -E option not yet supported + stub_msg | AssertionError: -E option not yet

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >