Solution provided by Donn Seeley in bug 1443:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
worked when testing with core-image-sato-sdk for qemuarm.
[YOCTO #2577]
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dinu
---
.../eglibc-2.16/0001-R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32.patch | 27
meta/recip
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> +-*reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
> ++*reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
That patch looks slightly dubious to me. Are you sure this doesn't
introduce any regressions elsewhere?
p.
___
O
On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
+- *reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
++ *reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
That patch looks slightly dubious to me. Are you sure this doesn't
introduce any regressions elsewhere?
p.
I
On 09/24/2012 04:26 AM, Andrei Dinu wrote:
Solution provided by Donn Seeley in bug 1443:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
worked when testing with core-image-sato-sdk for qemuarm.
[YOCTO #2577]
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dinu
---
.../eglibc-2.16/0001-R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32.patc
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> >> +- *reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
> >> ++ *reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
> > That patch looks slightly dubious to me. Are you sur
On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
+- *reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
++ *reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
That patch looks
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
>
> +- *re
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> >> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> +- *reloc_addr +=
On 9/28/12 9:02 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
+-
On Sep 28, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> In my testing no. But I never integrated it with OE, so I never ran the test
> suite Khem was referring to.
anyhow provided I have time I will try to run regressions on beagle bone and
see what I get.
_
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 09:35 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/28/12 9:02 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blun
On 9/28/12 9:57 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 09:35 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/28/12 9:02 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
On 09/24/
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 15:34 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> > Presumably it does at least pass the eglibc and binutils testsuites,
> > right?
> >
> Can u give me a location where i can find these test suites and how can
> i run them?
They're included in the eglibc and binutils distributions. I think
13 matches
Mail list logo
