Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-25 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 15:08, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Do we need special privileges to be able to run that? > > No, you only need to build meta-ide-support as the scripts take nfsd > executable from sysroot of that (could be improved and available > directly from qe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-24 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 14:44, Richard Purdie wrote: > Do we need special privileges to be able to run that? No, you only need to build meta-ide-support as the scripts take nfsd executable from sysroot of that (could be improved and available directly from qemu's own sysroot). Then it should simp

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 14:07 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 16:09, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > It would help, yes. If you do that it could be good to understand and > > document which areas we do/don't have test coverage of some kind for as > > we could then look at either

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-24 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 16:09, Richard Purdie wrote: > It would help, yes. If you do that it could be good to understand and > document which areas we do/don't have test coverage of some kind for as > we could then look at either adding it or dropping that support if it > isn't used. I sent a seco

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-22 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 16:09, Richard Purdie wrote: > > There was one failure in a-full with glibc tests, and that's fixed, > > but I can see there are more spots revealed by grep, e.g. runqemu and > > sdk_ext. They just aren't automatically tested. > > A change that worried me a lot was the remov

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 16:03 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 13:29, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > I understand why you want to do that but this will totally break the > > nfs export support, I could see at least one issue having looked at the > > first few patches this was dr

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-22 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 13:29, Richard Purdie wrote: > I understand why you want to do that but this will totally break the > nfs export support, I could see at least one issue having looked at the > first few patches this was dropping. I can go over every spot in poky/ where unfs is mentioned and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 14:31 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > This is the first release in 13 years; > accordingly I took the liberty of dropping all the patches > (none of which were ever reviewed or merged, and all of which > are difficult to impossible to rebase), and removed all > non-standard

[OE-core] [PATCH 05/17] unfs: update 0.9.22 -> 0.10.0

2022-11-20 Thread Alexander Kanavin
This is the first release in 13 years; accordingly I took the liberty of dropping all the patches (none of which were ever reviewed or merged, and all of which are difficult to impossible to rebase), and removed all non-standard hacks from the recipe. Drop -N from oeqa nfs helper; the option was p