Richard Purdie wrote:
> So I think my proposal stands, lets put the pieces from bitbake.conf
> into a bbclass file for now, the other pieces can merge into the core
> code.
Fair enough. I'll get a new patch set together.
--
Björn
___
Openembedded-core
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 16:52 +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > meta/classes/image.bbclass |6 ++-
> > > meta/classes/packagegroup.bbclass |2 +-
> > > meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 15 -
> >
>
Richard Purdie wrote:
> > meta/classes/image.bbclass |6 ++-
> > meta/classes/packagegroup.bbclass |2 +-
> > meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 15 -
>
> Whilst we're in bootstrapping mode for this work, how about we mak
Richard Purdie wrote:
> Whilst we're in bootstrapping mode for this work, how about we make
> these changes a "ptest.bbclass" file which we'd inherit in the recipes
> where we've got ptest enabled?
Ok. I'll give it a go and see how it turns out.
--
Björn
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:01 +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> This patch creates a new distro feature "ptest", which creates -ptest
> packages containing the test suite of the package for running on the
> target. Test files are installed in /usr/lib//ptest.
>
> The patch also includes a change to aut
This patch creates a new distro feature "ptest", which creates -ptest
packages containing the test suite of the package for running on the
target. Test files are installed in /usr/lib//ptest.
The patch also includes a change to automake, splitting the "make check"
target into separate steps for bu
This patch creates a new distro feature "ptest", which creates -ptest
packages containing the test suite of the package for running on the
target. Test files are installed in /usr/lib//ptest.
The patch also includes a change to automake, splitting the "make check"
target into separate steps for bu
