Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

I'm sorry, it's one of those days where "mtd-utils" and "mdadm" look exactly the same to me - yeah both are in oe-core, both start with m and are related to block devices. And the build failure with mdadm is reproducible with DEBUG_BUILD, -O2 and above work fine thanks to -ftree-vrp (similarly

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:20 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my > mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches? > > Ross > > On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Does

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches? Ross On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8? > > With current master I'm seeing: > super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8? With current master I'm seeing: super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last format character [-Werror=format-truncation=] On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good. Ross On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami wrote: > > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and > > is still marked as pending. > > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami wrote: > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and > is still marked as pending. > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

From: Denys Dmytriyenko Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko --- meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb