On 2014-03-01 19:10, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello David,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:59 PM, David Nyström wrote:
On 2014-02-27 16:18, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nyström wrote:
On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
Hi David,
My comments/qu
On Saturday 01 March 2014 18:21:59 Paul Barker wrote:
> On 1 March 2014 18:10, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Hello David,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:59 PM, David Nyström
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On 2014-02-27 16:18, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nys
On 1 March 2014 18:10, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:59 PM, David Nyström
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2014-02-27 16:18, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nyström wrote:
On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote
Hello David,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:59 PM, David Nyström wrote:
>
> On 2014-02-27 16:18, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nyström wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
>>>
Hi David,
My comments/questions below.
On 2014-02-27 16:18, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nyström wrote:
On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
Hi David,
My comments/questions below.
Thank you for your detailed comments on the RFC.
I will return with V2, where your comments are addres
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nyström wrote:
> On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> >Hi David,
> >
> >My comments/questions below.
>
> Thank you for your detailed comments on the RFC.
> I will return with V2, where your comments are addressed when the
> general approach
On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
Hi David,
My comments/questions below.
Thank you for your detailed comments on the RFC.
I will return with V2, where your comments are addressed when the
general approach is Acked.
What do you think about the general approach ?
I guess it was you
Hi David,
My comments/questions below.
laurentiu
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:28:21PM +0100, David Nyström wrote:
> local.conf defines
> PACKAGE_FEED_URIS = "http://www.feed_repo.org/repo/";
>
> should we do it this way or some other way ?
>
> [Bug 5407]
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: David Nyström
On 2014-02-27 15:04, David Nyström wrote:
local.conf defines
PACKAGE_FEED_URIS = "http://www.feed_repo.org/repo/";
should we do it this way or some other way ?
[Bug 5407]
Oops,
Duplicate, please comment on the other thread.
___
Openembedded-core
local.conf defines
PACKAGE_FEED_URIS = "http://www.feed_repo.org/repo/";
should we do it this way or some other way ?
[Bug 5407]
Signed-off-by: David Nyström
---
meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 76 +-
meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py | 15 +++--
2
local.conf defines
PACKAGE_FEED_URIS = "http://www.feed_repo.org/repo/";
should we do it this way or some other way ?
[Bug 5407]
Signed-off-by: David Nyström
---
meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 76 +-
meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py | 15 +++--
2
11 matches
Mail list logo
