Update to latest version
Add GNUv3 license
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com
---
.../nettle/{nettle_2.7.1.bb = nettle_3.0.bb}| 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/nettle/{nettle_2.7.1.bb = nettle_3.0.bb} (59%)
On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com wrote:
Add GNUv3 license
If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to remove
nettle 2.1, for people building without any v3 code in the images.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core
On 07/15/2014 06:49 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com wrote:
Add GNUv3 license
If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to remove
nettle 2.1, for people building without any v3 code in the images.
They have what they call dual
Ross,
Since we are keeping both versions, should I define a PREFERRED_VERSION?
- Armin
On 07/15/2014 06:49 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com wrote:
Add GNUv3 license
If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to remove
nettle
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 07:11 -0700, akuster wrote:
On 07/15/2014 06:49 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com wrote:
Add GNUv3 license
If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to remove
nettle 2.1, for people building without any
On 07/15/2014 07:19 AM, akuster808 wrote:
Ross,
Since we are keeping both versions, should I define a PREFERRED_VERSION?
No need to do that since the newer version will be used by default, and
when INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE with GPLv3 is set, the GPLv3 will be
blacklisted and the older GPLv2
Richard,
On 07/15/2014 08:09 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 07:11 -0700, akuster wrote:
On 07/15/2014 06:49 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com wrote:
Add GNUv3 license
If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to
