On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, GNUtoo wrote:
> hi, I've a bad checksum for SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
> I've tried to download it a second time and the bad checksum persist:
> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7861/7861) [100 %]
> NOTE: Parsing finished. 7056 cached, 461 parsed, 344 skipped, 0 masked.
> NOTE: Re
hi, I've a bad checksum for SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz
I've tried to download it a second time and the bad checksum persist:
NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7861/7861) [100 %]
NOTE: Parsing finished. 7056 cached, 461 parsed, 344 skipped, 0 masked.
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NO
From: Klaus Kurzmann
Signed-off-by: Klaus Kurzmann
---
recipes/e17/illume-keyboard-arabic_git.bb | 12 ++
recipes/e17/illume-keyboard-browse_git.bb | 20 ++
recipes/e17/illume-keyboard-danish_git.bb | 12 ++
recipes/e17/illume-key
Hello,
the issue with opie-networksettings appears with the new kernel headers.
Quick fix you could try:
wextensions.h
6c6
-#include
+//#include
Code is now in
Regards
Andrea
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembed
From: Klaus Kurzmann
Signed-off-by: Klaus Kurzmann
---
conf/distro/include/sane-srcrevs.inc |3 ++
recipes/e17/illume-keyboard-default_svn.bb | 43
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 recipes/e17/illume-keyboard-default_
From: Klaus Kurzmann
Signed-off-by: Klaus Kurzmann
---
recipes/e17/e-wm/drop-ilume-keyboards.patch | 17 +
recipes/e17/e-wm_svn.bb |3 ++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 recipes/e17/e-wm/drop-ilume-keyboards.patch
Hello all,
For SHR we want to be able to remove illumes default keyboard as most people
don't like it. To be able to do this nicely via the package manager we need to
have them in extra packages.
The first patch just moves a bunch of custom illume keyboards to the correct
place (at least I think
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:42 -0800, Charlie Woloszynski wrote:
> I am working on an OMAP project and I have been asked to include some
> Objective-C code into the project.
>
> I am looking at the build process and it looks like gcc-4.3.3 is built with
> objective C support, but I don't see the
>Some weeks ago I bought a MINI2440 target
>(http://www.friendlyarm.net/products/mini2440) and I tried to build an
>opie image for this target. I built the image about 20 october
>following the openembedded manual and it ran, but now I'm
>trying it again and I obtain a compilation error.
Very poss
I am working on an OMAP project and I have been asked to include some
Objective-C code into the project.
I am looking at the build process and it looks like gcc-4.3.3 is built with
objective C support, but I don't see the headers or runtime library installed
anywhere for cross compilation.
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 19:46 +0100 schrieb Holger Hans Peter
Freyther:
> Stupid question. What is fso-apm and what does it provide?
An apm utility that has the same UI as apm, but uses FSO's DBus API
to do its job.
:M:
___
Openembedded-devel mai
On Friday 20 November 2009 15:41:36 Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Please revert the cset since it breaks every distro except SHR[1].
>
> done
One thing with the revert... you have a PR that went backwards. You will have
to figure out if that is a problem for your distro or not.
On Friday 20 November 2009 15:39:41 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
> > Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisał(a):
> > > Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome.
> >
> > In distro config:
>
Hi everybody. I'm new in this list and new in openembedded and I would
like to learn a lot about all this topics.
Some weeks ago I bought a MINI2440 target
(http://www.friendlyarm.net/products/mini2440) and I tried to build an
opie image for this target. I built the image about 20 october
followin
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Chris Conroy wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 20:54 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > a couple silly questions while i prep a guile package update.
> >
> > 1) if a newer package is added under recipes, i'm assuming that
> > it's the newest version of the package that will be us
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 20:54 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> a couple silly questions while i prep a guile package update.
>
> 1) if a newer package is added under recipes, i'm assuming that it's
> the newest version of the package that will be used for a build,
> unless a PREFERRED_VERSION direct
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 14:46 + schrieb Graeme Gregory:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:39:41 +0100
> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
> > > Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> On 20-11-09 15:39, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
> >> Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Better suggestions on how to a
On 20-11-09 15:39, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisał(a):
Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome.
In distro config:
MACHINE_FEATURES_om-gta01 = "t
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:39:41 +0100
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
> > Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome.
> >
> > In distr
Koen Kooi wrote:
> Please revert the cset since it breaks every distro except SHR[1].
done
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
> Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisał(a):
>
> > Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome.
>
> In distro config:
>
> MACHINE_FEATURES_om-gta01 = "this that those butnoapm"
>
> This way
On 20-11-09 15:24, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Can someone please explain to me what
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=1bfa409a3a28cee60c4800d3caf33ce3f100d4ca
is trying to accomplish? It looks like this makes task-base unusable on
om-gta0X, am I right?
Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisał(a):
> Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome.
In distro config:
MACHINE_FEATURES_om-gta01 = "this that those butnoapm"
This way your distro has what you want and others have what was set in machine
config.
Regar
Koen Kooi wrote:
> Can someone please explain to me what
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=1bfa409a3a28cee60c4800d3caf33ce3f100d4ca
> is trying to accomplish? It looks like this makes task-base unusable on
> om-gta0X, am I right?
FSO/SHR based distros use fso-apm r
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Philip Balister wrote:
> I applied this. A couple of comments for the future:
>
> 1) Make the commit message "guile: Upgrade from 1.8.6 to 1.8.7" for
> consistency.
>
> 2) You can include the checksums in the recipe now. See:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembed
Robert Schuster ha scritto, Il 20/11/2009 11:16:
> Hi,
> besides the stand I also applied for an OE devroom. It is likely that we
> are again put together with the embedded guys which isn't that bad I think.
>
> Anyway.
>
> Start thinking about an OpenEmbedded-related talk at FOSDEM! I also try
>
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:15:23 +0100
Koen Kooi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please explain to me what
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=1bfa409a3a28cee60c4800d3caf33ce3f100d4ca
>
> is trying to accomplish? It looks like this makes task-base unusable
> on om-gta0X,
Hi,
Can someone please explain to me what
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=1bfa409a3a28cee60c4800d3caf33ce3f100d4ca
is trying to accomplish? It looks like this makes task-base unusable on
om-gta0X, am I right?
regards,
Koen
2009/11/19 Richard Purdie :
> Its been 10 days since I posted the summary and started pushing some of
> the changes. There have been some bumps but the changes so far seem to
> have settled down quite well.
>
> The proposals and status is as follows:
>
> a) Adopt the removal of the layout_* variabl
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Philip Balister wrote:
> Dont't worry, I already applied it. The notes are for future
> reference.
ok, thanks. and, for the record, current bb-demo-image is now on
task 8001 of 10078 on dev branch, still no fatal errors. happy happy,
joy joy.
rday
--
==
Koen Kooi wrote:
> The change looks file, but the Author field is wrong (people have last
> names, unless you're called Wookie) and the commit message isn't to OE
> standards either.
> In the future fix up both before committing. It can get tedious, I know,
> I do it for my coworkers as well :)
Ap
Dont't worry, I already applied it. The notes are for future reference.
On 11/20/2009 07:28 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Philip Balister wrote:
I applied this. A couple of comments for the future:
1) Make the commit message "guile: Upgrade from 1.8.6 to 1.8.7" for
consiste
On 20-11-09 13:23, Philip Balister wrote:
2) You can include the checksums in the recipe now. See:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/curl/curl_7.19.7.bb
look in the curl-common.inc file for the "tarball" naming.
Is there a script to do that for me? If not, I'll
On 20-11-09 13:12, Alex Ferguson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Koen Kooiwrote:
We stopped hardcoding event numbers in OE years ago, even the opie people
saw the light, so I wonder what's the matter with the omnia to go backwards
a few years :(
I see where you're getting at, and I'
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Philip Balister wrote:
> I applied this. A couple of comments for the future:
>
> 1) Make the commit message "guile: Upgrade from 1.8.6 to 1.8.7" for
> consistency.
>
> 2) You can include the checksums in the recipe now. See:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembed
I applied this. A couple of comments for the future:
1) Make the commit message "guile: Upgrade from 1.8.6 to 1.8.7" for
consistency.
2) You can include the checksums in the recipe now. See:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/curl/curl_7.19.7.bb
look in the curl-
On 11/20/2009 06:42 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
On 20-11-09 12:03, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
See attached patch. We'd love to replace the default illume config with
our distro-specific version, so this will make the config RDEPENDS
overridable from our distro conf. Is such a change acceptable for OE?
T
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> We stopped hardcoding event numbers in OE years ago, even the opie people
> saw the light, so I wonder what's the matter with the omnia to go backwards
> a few years :(
I see where you're getting at, and I'll add that to my FIXME list. As I
s
On 20-11-09 12:03, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
See attached patch. We'd love to replace the default illume config with
our distro-specific version, so this will make the config RDEPENDS
overridable from our distro conf. Is such a change acceptable for OE?
The change looks file, but the Author field
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> See attached patch. We'd love to replace the default illume config with
> our distro-specific version, so this will make the config RDEPENDS
> overridable from our distro conf. Is such a change acceptable for OE?
Yes, that looks fine. I
On 20-11-09 10:51, Alex Ferguson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Koen Kooiwrote:
Could you please explain why the default tslib.sh isn't working for you?
Because it doesn't? /dev/input/touchscreenX doesn't exist.
Then you need to investigate why it doesn't get created.
The devi
See attached patch. We'd love to replace the default illume config with
our distro-specific version, so this will make the config RDEPENDS
overridable from our distro conf. Is such a change acceptable for OE?
spaetz
--- Begin Message ---
---
recipes/tasks/task-x11-illume.bb |3 ++-
1 files ch
Hi,
besides the stand I also applied for an OE devroom. It is likely that we
are again put together with the embedded guys which isn't that bad I think.
Anyway.
Start thinking about an OpenEmbedded-related talk at FOSDEM! I also try
to reach someone from MontaVista and Palm so talk about
their OE
Even better fix for builders with BB_GIT_CLONE_FOR_SRCREV enabled.
--
uin:136542059jid:martin.ja...@gmail.com
Jansa Martin sip:jama...@voip.wengo.fr
JaMa
>From b2a572666d6cf31c2c39b3123b97e972f01bbb36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
bitbake tested on x86_64.
diff --git a/conf/checksums.ini b/conf/checksums.ini
index b2bc05b..5529b73 100644
--- a/conf/checksums.ini
+++ b/conf/checksums.ini
@@ -11426,6 +11426,10 @@
sha256=e2f63d2d445ffeb072638eab885b1a629e372d1db711c8afb26a62bc56096289
Hi,
I have updated the bitbake to 1.8.18, and now the problem is different:
Thanks in advance,
Paolo
ERROR: function do_compile failed
ERROR: log data follows
(/home/paolo/oe/stuff/build/tmp/work/i586-angstrom-linux/xserver-kdrive-1_1.4.0.90-r7/temp/log.do_compile.23255)
| NOTE: make
| Making all
Hello everyone,
I wrote a request for a two table stand. I'll let you know how it
turned out. Results
will be published within a week.
Please start thinking about who is going to man the stand! :-)
Cheers!
Robert
Florian Boor schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Philip Balister schrieb:
>
>> Who wants to appl
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2009 10:20:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > obviously, the fetch of ffmpeg eventually works, but any value
> > in cleaning up the initial fetch errors?
>
> This is normal operation. The reasoning is that we want to be
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Could you please explain why the default tslib.sh isn't working for you?
Because it doesn't? /dev/input/touchscreenX doesn't exist. The devices
/dev/input/event0 and /dev/input/event1 are consistently assigned to
keyboard and touchscreen, re
* there was ${WORKDIR}}
* zone.tab, iso1366.tab is removed in eglibc/eglibc-package.bbclass
---
recipes/tzdata/tzdata.inc | 13 ++---
recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2009s.bb |3 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2009s.bb
diff
On Friday 20 November 2009 10:20:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> obviously, the fetch of ffmpeg eventually works, but any value in
> cleaning up the initial fetch errors?
This is normal operation. The reasoning is that we want to be good to the
upstream infrastructure and don't want all OE users
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:20:25 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
>
> in the midst of a bb-demo-image build:
>
> obviously, the fetch of ffmpeg eventually works, but any value in
> cleaning up the initial fetch errors?
>
Is it April 1st in your locale
This is normal operation of
On 15-11-09 14:34, Alex Ferguson wrote:
I've been working on some initial support for the Samsung Omnia (SGH-i900)
in the form of a machine configuration file and kernel. I also posted this
as a bug here:
http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5335
Oops, I missed a serious bug in your pa
in the midst of a bb-demo-image build:
NOTE: Running task 5661 of 10078 (ID: 6173,
/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_svn.bb, do_fetch)
NOTE: Running task 5662 of 10078 (ID: 9997,
/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/xscrnsaverh/xscrnsaverh_1.0.bb,
do_populate_staging)
--2009-11
55 matches
Mail list logo
