That's what I think. I tried to apply the patch and configure/compile
glibc. the configuring process works OK but the compilation failed. I
think the patch is not the only one cause of the error.
在 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:20:21 +0800，Khem Raj 写道:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Guo Hongruan
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Guo Hongruan wrote:
> Hi guys,
> When compiling glibc, I meet the following error information. You can
> reproduce it as the following:
> DISTRO = "minimal"
> MACHINE = "qemux86"
> bitbake helloworld-image
>
> By the way, when using eglibc, it works OK. Anyo
Hi guys,
When compiling glibc, I meet the following error information. You can
reproduce it as the following:
DISTRO = "minimal"
MACHINE = "qemux86"
bitbake helloworld-image
By the way, when using eglibc, it works OK. Anyone can give me some
hints?
Thanks a lot.
| checking whethe
No, it is not a bug. I just want to specify the libc type explicitly in
the distribution name.
在 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:25:49 +0800，Phil Blundell 写道:
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 10:24 +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote:
1. conf/distro/minimal-eglibc.conf: add minimal distribution based on
eglibc.
2. conf/d
All right, I will try to figure out the cause and fix it.
在 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:20:06 +0800，Henning Heinold
写道:
Hi,
sorry I didnt test it with i386 yet. But seems that the strip of diet
somehow effected compilation, because
the compilation of elftrunc segfaults now. Maybee its my patch,
Yea, I understand. Thanks a lot.
I used to check the rootfs directory quickly, to verify whether or not
some packages have been installed correctly and to check the rootfs size.
So when I can not find it as usual, I am amazing.
Thank all of you.
在 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:07:42 +0800，Khem Raj
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * include/asm link was killed in
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f7f16b7799ed68654850ab340ef812895aebcf4c
> * utsrelease.h was moved in
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/li
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 12/22/2009 05:25 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/22 Denys Dmytriyenko:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:05:31AM -0600, Mike Westerhof wrote:
Guo Hongruan wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> Today, I build an base-
* include/asm link was killed in
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f7f16b7799ed68654850ab340ef812895aebcf4c
* utsrelease.h was moved in
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=273b281fa22c293963ee3e6eec418f5
On 12/22/2009 05:25 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2009/12/22 Denys Dmytriyenko:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:05:31AM -0600, Mike Westerhof wrote:
Guo Hongruan wrote:
Hi guys,
Today, I build an base-image using OE. And I want to check the content
of rootfs, but I found the directory rootfs in
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2009/12/22 Denys Dmytriyenko :
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:05:31AM -0600, Mike Westerhof wrote:
Guo Hongruan wrote:
Hi guys,
Today, I build an base-image using OE. And I want to check the content
of rootfs, but I found the directory rootfs in building
2009/12/22 Denys Dmytriyenko :
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:05:31AM -0600, Mike Westerhof wrote:
>> Guo Hongruan wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> > Today, I build an base-image using OE. And I want to check the content
>> > of rootfs, but I found the directory rootfs in building directory is
>> > empty. I
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 16:48 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear OE hackers,
>
>
> please see attachment.
>
Thanks for the patch. I checked this in.
p.
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtog
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:05:31AM -0600, Mike Westerhof wrote:
> Guo Hongruan wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > Today, I build an base-image using OE. And I want to check the content
> > of rootfs, but I found the directory rootfs in building directory is
> > empty. I remember there was the ontent of the
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Guo Hongruan wrote:
> ---
> conf/distro/minimal-eglibc.conf | 14 +++---
> conf/distro/minimal.conf | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/conf/distro/minimal-eglibc.conf b/conf/distro/minimal-eglibc.conf
>
On 12/22/2009 10:47 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2009/12/22 Graeme Gregory:
Hi, fellow TSC members and general OE community.
I think we should try and organise a general one hour chat of the
TSC on irc sometime the first week in January (4th - 8th). I think
we should probably hold this private
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-12-09 17:13, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Frans Meulenbroeks
>
>> 2009/12/22 Graeme Gregory :
>>> Hi, fellow TSC members and general OE community.
>>>
>>> I think we should try and organise a general one hour chat of the
>>> TSC on irc so
2009/12/22 Frans Meulenbroeks
> 2009/12/22 Graeme Gregory :
> > Hi, fellow TSC members and general OE community.
> >
> > I think we should try and organise a general one hour chat of the
> > TSC on irc sometime the first week in January (4th - 8th). I think
> > we should probably hold this privat
2009/12/22 Graeme Gregory :
> Hi, fellow TSC members and general OE community.
>
> I think we should try and organise a general one hour chat of the
> TSC on irc sometime the first week in January (4th - 8th). I think
> we should probably hold this private discussion just to organise
> ourselves th
Guo Hongruan wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Today, I build an base-image using OE. And I want to check the content
> of rootfs, but I found the directory rootfs in building directory is
> empty. I remember there was the ontent of the target root filesystem.
> Why have to remove them? Does it means the rootf
Hi, fellow TSC members and general OE community.
I think we should try and organise a general one hour chat of the
TSC on irc sometime the first week in January (4th - 8th). I think
we should probably hold this private discussion just to organise
ourselves then organise some form of public meeting
Dear folks,
since upon Graeme's last ask for applications we had exactly the same
amounts of candidates as slots for the TSC, subsequent voting was
pointless -- hence we now have the first TSC in effect, which consists
of:
Michael Lauer
Graeme Gregory
Koen Kooi
Chris Larson
Richard Purdie
Please
Hi,
sorry I didnt test it with i386 yet. But seems that the strip of diet somehow
effected compilation, because
the compilation of elftrunc segfaults now. Maybee its my patch, which let diet
compile with ccache.
And sorry that I dont have the time to look at it closer.
Bye Henning
Am Sonntag, den 13.12.2009, 16:48 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear OE hackers,
>
>
> please see attachment.
If I did not make a mistake this should be trivial to be committed?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
__
Bump
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 10:24 +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote:
> 1. conf/distro/minimal-eglibc.conf: add minimal distribution based on eglibc.
> 2. conf/distro/minimal.conf: use glibc instead of eglibc
What's the reason for this change? If eglibc is deficient in some way
then I would prefer to either see
Hello,
In the gSOAP package I noticed the following patch was applied to the
native build: use-just-built-binary.patch
This patches the makefiles of gSOAP so that the correct executable is used.
However the problem originates from the fact that the makefile
variable $(SOAP) is overridden in gsoap_
Hi guys,
Today, I build an base-image using OE. And I want to check the content
of rootfs, but I found the directory rootfs in building directory is
empty. I remember there was the ontent of the target root filesystem. Why
have to remove them? Does it means the rootfs directory is unuseful
28 matches
Mail list logo
