Re: [oe] [RFC] Removal of gpdf from the repository

ACK. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] [PATCH][omniorb]

On 02/25/2010 05:08 PM, majo huber wrote: h...@all, The attached files are a newer recipie for omniorb (4.1.4 instead of 4.0.7). I'd kinly request if someone could push it to the dev branch. OK, I've pushed this. I know the recipe needs converting to BBCLASSEXTEND. When I have some time, I'll

Re: [oe] Trying and Failing to enable Java with GCC 4.3.3

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: > Oh, sorry about that.  I've attached the do_configure log for gcc_cross.   > Doesn't look too helpful to me, but what do I know?  If you meant some other > configure log, let me know! > > In case it helps: before trying to build gcj inside OE,

[oe] [PATCH 4/5] defconfig: kernel config file for xilinx ml507 devboard

Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso --- recipes/linux/linux-xilinx-ml507/defconfig | 1415 1 files changed, 1415 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-xilinx-ml507/defconfig diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-xilinx-ml507/defconfig b/recipes/l

[oe] [PATCH 3/5] linux-xilinx-ml507_git.bb: new kernel recipe for ml507 devboard

* Based on xilinx repos since not all drivers are in mainline kernel tree * inherit xilinx-bsp for updating harware model changes Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso --- recipes/linux/linux-xilinx-ml507_git.bb | 23 +++ 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mod

[oe] [PATCH 1/5] xilinx-ml507.conf: fix several options

* Fix u-boot entry and load address * Prefered kernel based on xilinx repos, not all drivers in mainline tree * Add device nodes for system ace Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso --- conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf | 11 --- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/

[oe] [PATCH 5/5] device_table_add-xsa.txt: device nodes for system ace

Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso --- files/device_table_add-xsa.txt |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 files/device_table_add-xsa.txt diff --git a/files/device_table_add-xsa.txt b/files/device_table_add-xsa.txt new file mode 100644 index 000..a0bc4

[oe] [PATCH 2/5] tune-ppc440.inc: add base arch to package extra archs

Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso --- conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc b/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc index 0c41db4..1c94a34 100644 --- a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc +++

Re: [oe] [RFC] Removal of gpdf from the repository

On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 23:13 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > I would like to remove recipes/gpdf from the OpenEmbedded repository and also > the checksums entries. The reason is simple. gpdf contains a copy of the xpdf > sourcecode which had various security issues since the release of

[oe] [RFC] Removal of gpdf from the repository

Hi, I would like to remove recipes/gpdf from the OpenEmbedded repository and also the checksums entries. The reason is simple. gpdf contains a copy of the xpdf sourcecode which had various security issues since the release of gpdf 2.10 in 2007. Do I get an ack on the removal of it? z. __

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Fix packaged staging for cross packages

It looks like this does fix the problem, and good job in spotting the problem, but this fix assumes that the basename of CROSS_DIR is BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH. If that ever changes for whatever reason, it will break. I'd suggest instead changing it to continue to copy the contents of the dir, but to cha

[oe] [PATCH] Fix packaged staging for cross packages

Hi, While working on packaged staging in Poky I noticed that cross packages where being incorrectly packaged. After spending quite some time to track down the issue and fix it I committed a patch to Poky master[1] to fix it. Attached is a copy of the patch for packages-staging.bbclass against oe

Re: [oe] [PATCH] package_ipk.bbclass DON'T PUSH THIS, but PLEASE read it

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:19:37PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:07:11PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Its a serious bug I agree but a very hard one to fix. The correct fix is > > to have staging under full control of a packaging system, then when you > > clean packages

Re: [oe] [RFC] Make some big changes right after next stable

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:30 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > As many people know, there's a lot of "odd" internal things that OE > does, that if we had it to do over, we would do differently. What I > would like to propose is that in time for the next stable branch we: > 1: Define a set of DISTROs/MACHINE

Re: [oe] [RFC] Initial Proposal for Packaged Staging Revamp (was [RFC] Make some big changes right after next stable)

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 11:28 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > No, I think I didn't make this clear enough. These goals are for the entire > implementation, not the diff of the current method against new. These are > the end goals of the needs we want this entire notion of binary caching and > package

Re: [oe] [RFC] Initial Proposal for Packaged Staging Revamp (was [RFC] Make some big changes right after next stable)

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 18:17 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 03-03-10 18:09, Chris Larson wrote: > > To summarize, I propose the creation of an archive/package which acts as the > > primary artifact to come out of the build of a recipe. > > That sounds like a good way to do packaged-staging without m

[oe] boost library issue

Hi I am getting an error of boost library while bitbaking an image.OE can not find boost file system library.Terminal log shows this error as | configure: error: cannot find boost_filesystem library. Image is of ossie and I am unable to resolve this problem.I already discussed it with some pe

Re: [oe] Trying and Failing to enable Java with GCC 4.3.3

Oh, sorry about that. I've attached the do_configure log for gcc_cross. Doesn't look too helpful to me, but what do I know? If you meant some other configure log, let me know! In case it helps: before trying to build gcj inside OE, I was trying to build a native GCC compiler on the target ma

Re: [oe] beagleboard-demo-image compiling errors in Fedora 12

Hi Kai, I have resolve the build issued for Fedora 12 x86 64-bit for the Overo, should work the same for the beagle board. Best regards, Elvis Dowson Technote Overo-031: How to setup a development environment for the Overo platform using a Fedora-12 x86 64-bit VMware image Ove

Re: [oe] [PATCH 7/8] autoconf: add 2.65

Dnia środa, 10 lutego 2010 o 21:12:59 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer napisał(a): > xz needs >= 2.64 > Also add patches to recognize BusyBox versions of programs. > Add patch for gettext-0.17 to nop out m4_copy on autoconf > 2.63 Can you update that changeset? Also please split it to 1. autoconf 2. get

Re: [oe] [PATCH 0/4] update ts72xx kernels

Dnia środa, 3 marca 2010 o 20:41:41 Petr Štetiar napisał(a): > Hi, > > this series of patches aims to update ts72xx kernels in OE. > It's a second try (I've sent them already month ago), so I'm kindly asking > to apply them :-) Thanks. pushed Regards, -- JID: h...@jabber.org Website: ht

Re: [oe] I.MX25 and OE

Hi Jaume, Le 04/03/2010 11:01, FQ | Jaume Ribot a écrit : Just a question: Is somebody working in any port of OE to an I.MX25 Freescale platform. As I can see, some people has been porting this processor to the kernel mainline, but don't know if any recipe/s exist or are under development. you

[oe] Where are my patches?

Once again i miss a patch proposal of mine in the patch queue. :( It is this one: Is there something wrong with it? Am i somehow blacklistet? Steffen ___ Openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] I.MX25 and OE

Hi, > Just a question: Is somebody working in any port of OE to an I.MX25 > Freescale platform. As I can see, some people has been porting this > processor to the kernel mainline, but don't know if any recipe/s exist or > are under development. > I am about to start working on adding the mx25pdk

[oe] I.MX25 and OE

Hi all, Just a question: Is somebody working in any port of OE to an I.MX25 Freescale platform. As I can see, some people has been porting this processor to the kernel mainline, but don't know if any recipe/s exist or are under development. Best regards. Jaume _

[oe] beagleboard-demo-image compiling errors in Fedora 12

I got the following beagleboard-demo-image compiling errors in Fedora 12, x86_64 i7 core. | ccache arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -Wall -g -DGTK2_12_ENABLED -DGLIB2_14_ENABLED -DGIO_ENABLED -DHAVE_ASOUNDLIB -DHAVE_GCONF -DNOTIFY_E

Re: [oe] Xserver problem...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04-03-10 05:32, balakrishnan wrote: > Hi, > I am using Angstrom OS for my pxa270 based board, which is build by > Stable/2009 branch. In this, Xserver is running perperly on 240x320 and > 640x480 resolution, but while running 480x272 resolution lcd

Re: [oe] Xserver problem...

>Hi, >I am using Angstrom OS for my pxa270 based board, which is build by >Stable/2009 branch. In this, Xserver is running perperly on 240x320 and >640x480 resolution, but while running 480x272 resolution lcd 4.3" it >making problem. How can I resolve this. > >Version : xserver-kdrive-1_