2010/3/18 Douglas Royds douglas.ro...@tait.co.nz:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
- bindir_cross similarly renamed for consistency
[...]
# Path prefixes
base_prefix = ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}
-prefix = ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}${prefix_native}
-exec_prefix =
2010/3/17 Scott Garman sgar...@zenlinux.com:
* Latest development version (should be stable, same version is in
Debian Stable)
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman sgar...@zenlinux.com
---
recipes/grip/grip-3.3.1/no-host-includes.patch | 10 ++
recipes/grip/grip_3.3.1.bb
Tom Rini wrote:
Please, pretty please, can we change to:
SRCREV_OPKG ?= nnn
SRCREV_pn-opkg ?= ${SRCREV_OPKG}
SRCREV_pn-opkg-native ?= ${SRCREV_OPKG}
SRCREV_pn-opkg-sdk ?= ${SRCREV_OPKG}
All three really are just as important to not have broken because they
weren't tested hard enough (iirc,
Dear OE folks,
reading the OE user manual I wonder about the section »Wildcards«
regarding packages [1].
There are some statements as the following.
PACKAGES += FILES-${PN}-test
Is that correct or should it be fixed?
Thanks,
Paul
[1]
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 08:18 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2010/3/18 Douglas Royds douglas.ro...@tait.co.nz:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
- bindir_cross similarly renamed for consistency
[...]
# Path prefixes
base_prefix =
Dear OE folks,
in [1] there is »PE = 1«.
I could not find `${PE}` in the user manual and searching for »${pe}
openembedded« did not work either.
Thanks,
Paul
[1]
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/gimp/babl_git.bb#n7
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Paul Menzel
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Dear OE folks,
in [1] there is »PE = 1«.
I could not find `${PE}` in the user manual and searching for »${pe}
openembedded« did not work either.
It's the package epoch as described in the Debian Policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-10 11:23, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear OE folks,
reading the OE user manual I wonder about the section »Wildcards«
regarding packages [1].
There are some statements as the following.
PACKAGES += FILES-${PN}-test
That bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-10 15:19, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:34 PM, git version control
g...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
Module: openembedded.git
Branch: org.openembedded.dev
Commit: e04b826e9b24dbe3b9332da8da9b9310f5125dc4
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, applied
On 17-03-10 18:38, Enrico Scholz wrote:
From: Enrico Scholz enrico.sch...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
Old .inc file listed every single header which was to be staged. This
causes problems when upgrading to recent 0.5.1 version or
Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Jaison,
If you update your git tree, opie-packagemanager should now build correctly. I
didn't have a chance to test if it actually worked at runtime though, please
let me know (privately) if it does or doesn't.
Thanks for the update :)
best regards
Bernhard
HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI changed at freesmartphone.org
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it
---
.../vala-dbus-binding-tool.inc |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/vala-dbus-binding-tool/vala-dbus-binding-tool.inc
Hi Khem,
My host OS is
Fedora 12 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64
Gcc version installed in my system
gcc (GCC) 4.4.3 20100127
which is the late's version available
cleaning and rebuilding gcc-cross doesn't make the error go away
A complete log can be found at [1].
[1] http://pastebin.com/BftKvgGA
Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 17:41 +0100 schrieb Antonio Ospite:
HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI changed at freesmartphone.org
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it
Applied, thanks!
--
:M:
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 02:31:11 Douglas Royds wrote:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
- bindir_cross similarly renamed for consistency
Thank you for that much work. I think we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-10 18:29, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 02:31:11 Douglas Royds wrote:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
-
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:04:24PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Try using file://ivorbis-thumb.patch;patch=1 from gst-plugins-bad.
regards,
Yes, that worked, thanks!
Applied
Regards,
--
uin:136542059jid:martin.ja...@gmail.com
Jansa Martin
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Adrian Alonso aalons...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Khem,
My host OS is
Fedora 12 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64
Gcc version installed in my system
gcc (GCC) 4.4.3 20100127
which is the late's version available
cleaning and rebuilding gcc-cross doesn't make the error
Hello all.
As perl 5.10.1 is a big patch by itself and series overall is 42 patches and I
don't want to banned from list for spam ;), I've commited that to the
rik/perl-5.10 branch of OE repo.
In general, the most interesting and the most requiring review are the first
4, all the other are
2010/3/18 Roman I Khimov ro...@khimov.ru:
Hello all.
As perl 5.10.1 is a big patch by itself and series overall is 42 patches and I
don't want to banned from list for spam ;), I've commited that to the
rik/perl-5.10 branch of OE repo.
In general, the most interesting and the most requiring
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 18:49 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-10 18:29, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 02:31:11 Douglas Royds wrote:
- Avoids clashing
В сообщении от Четверг 18 марта 2010 22:36:57 автор Frans Meulenbroeks
написал:
2010/3/18 Roman I Khimov ro...@khimov.ru:
Hello all.
As perl 5.10.1 is a big patch by itself and series overall is 42 patches
and I don't want to banned from list for spam ;), I've commited that to
the
BTW, I also think that we should drop versions 5.8.4 and 5.8.7, I see no
single reason for them to stay in March 2010.
--
http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: ro...@khimov.ru
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 18:49 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-10 18:29, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-10 20:12, Roman I Khimov wrote:
Hello all.
As perl 5.10.1 is a big patch by itself and series overall is 42 patches and
I
don't want to banned from list for spam ;), I've commited that to the
rik/perl-5.10 branch of OE repo.
In
building gnutls_2.8.5.bb fails in do_configure with these messages:
[..]
| automake: unknown warning category `cross'
| doc/Makefile.am:27: ENABLE_GTK_DOC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
| gtk-doc.make:7: GTK_DOC_USE_LIBTOOL does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
| doc/reference/Makefile.am:135:
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2010/3/18 Douglas Royds douglas.ro...@tait.co.nz:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
- bindir_cross similarly renamed for consistency
[...]
# Path prefixes
base_prefix = ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}
-prefix =
В сообщении от Четверг 18 марта 2010 23:30:03 автор Koen Kooi написал:
On 18-03-10 20:12, Roman I Khimov wrote:
Hello all.
As perl 5.10.1 is a big patch by itself and series overall is 42 patches
and I don't want to banned from list for spam ;), I've commited that to
the rik/perl-5.10
Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 02:31:11 Douglas Royds wrote:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
- bindir_cross similarly renamed for consistency
Thank you
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 09:48 +1300, Douglas Royds wrote:
Any renaming of base_prefix, exec_prefix, base_bindir, target_datadir,
c is a separate matter. Note that some of these names are imposed on us
by Autotools convention. This is why these variables are in lower case
in the first place:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 09:58 +1300, Douglas Royds wrote:
Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 02:31:11 Douglas Royds wrote:
- Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native
-
Hi Khem,
gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3 and gcc-cross-intermediate-4.3.3 build correctly
fixincl.o object
tmp/work/ppc440-angstrom-linux/gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3-r11.1/gcc-4.3.3/build.x86_64-linux.powerpc-angstrom-linux/fixincludes/fixincl.o:
ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), not
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Adrian Alonso aalons...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Khem,
gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3 and gcc-cross-intermediate-4.3.3 build correctly
fixincl.o object
В сообщении от Пятница 19 марта 2010 00:04:30 автор Roman I Khimov написал:
В сообщении от Четверг 18 марта 2010 23:47:01 автор Roman I Khimov написал:
No. You mean, this one?
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=ca5f36ee6ad756e1e540288
a5 6a504c1d8ecc7a3
Looks like a good
В сообщении от Четверг 18 марта 2010 23:47:01 автор Roman I Khimov написал:
No. You mean, this one?
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=ca5f36ee6ad756e1e540288a5
6a504c1d8ecc7a3
Looks like a good thing to have, so if Richard will push it to OE.dev I can
do a rebase of my
I have submitted a patch, and after discussion want to correct it.
Do I submit the corrected patch as a reply to the existing email thread,
or start a new thread? If I submit the new patch as a reply to the
existing thread, will patchwork pick up the corrected patch, or remain
on the original
* Latest development version (should be stable, same version is in
Debian Stable)
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman sgar...@zenlinux.com
---
recipes/grip/grip-3.3.1/no-host-includes.patch | 10 ++
recipes/grip/grip_3.3.1.bb | 17 +
2 files changed, 27
37 matches
Mail list logo
