On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like a fine idea to me (although I must say I was unaware of the amend
class, so I cannot really compare).
An alternative I was thinking of was to have a mechanism in an overlayed
recipe that would
On 07/16/10 16:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
For the specific case of paths, I have wondered if there would be a way
to leverage help from bitbake in creating a sane set of search paths but
I'm still thinking about that. This extension is good enough in its own
right in my opinion to be worthwhile.
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:36:18AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On (09/06/10 11:33), Dmitry Artamonow wrote:
+do_configure() {
+cp ${WORKDIR}/Makerules ${S}/Makerules
+
Why not create a patch for Makerules instread of creating a file and then
copying. It will help upgrades the patch will
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Acked-by: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de
Acked-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 09:37, Graham Gower wrote:
Breakage introduced by 74e32f114272668dfa4c88805741cf55ef965989.
Other recipes which call base_do_unpack directly do not share this issue.
Signed-off-by: Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com
Acked-by:
Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
On 17-07-10 10:35, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 01:03 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
On 16-07-10 17:23, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Paul Menzel
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Am
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/16/10 16:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
For the specific case of paths, I have wondered if there would be a way
to leverage help from bitbake in creating a sane set of search paths but
I'm still thinking about that.
Thanks a lot,pushed.
Denis.
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
On 07/18/10 17:13, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/16/10 16:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
For the specific case of paths, I have wondered if there would be a way
to leverage help from bitbake in creating a sane set of search
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/18/10 17:13, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/16/10 16:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
For the specific case of paths, I have wondered if there would
Hello.
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 16:19, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 09:37, Graham Gower wrote:
Breakage introduced by 74e32f114272668dfa4c88805741cf55ef965989.
Other recipes which call base_do_unpack directly do not share this issue.
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 17:47 + schrieb git version control:
Module: openembedded.git
Branch: org.openembedded.dev
Commit: 3b441d30742710dbd043938c21bf26d09240cd53
URL:
http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.gita=commit;h=3b441d30742710dbd043938c21bf26d09240cd53
Author:
Hello.
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 20:11, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 17:47 + schrieb git version control:
Module: openembedded.git
Branch: org.openembedded.dev
Commit: 3b441d30742710dbd043938c21bf26d09240cd53
URL:
On 07/18/10 18:06, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/18/10 17:13, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/16/10 16:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
For the specific case
2010/7/16 Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code in
a layer, how do you add a
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 21:24 +0200, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
On 07/18/10 18:06, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On 07/18/10 17:13, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Detlef Vollmann d...@vollmann.ch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/16 Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
machine
2010/7/18 Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/16 Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a
Hello,
there was a patch for base.bbclass that made it accept GNUmakefile as a
makefile. That patch was supposedly applied:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg06820.html
Yet I don't seem to see it committed:
On 17/07/10 02:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code in
a layer, how do you add a pointercal
20 matches
Mail list logo
