[oe] [PATCH v2 1/2] SWI-Prolog: New program

* Starting with SWI-Prolog 5.10.1 * SWI-Prolog is a fast and powerful ISO/Edinburgh-style Prolog compiler with a * rich set of built-in predicates. It offers a fast, robust and small * environment which enables substantial applications to be developed with it. Signed-off-by: Jayen Ashar --- re

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/4] gedit: sort `DEPENDS` alphabetically

I saw the changes: Thanks :-) Am I right: no further action on this issue required from my side? Andreas Original-Nachricht > Datum: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:05:38 +0200 > Von: Frans Meulenbroeks > An: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > Betreff: Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/4] gedit:

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/4] gedit: sort `DEPENDS` alphabetically

All 4 patches applied & pushed Thanks alot for your contribution. Frans ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

[oe] [PATCH v2 2/2] SWI-Prolog: New program

* Starting with SWI-Prolog 5.10.1 * SWI-Prolog is a fast and powerful ISO/Edinburgh-style Prolog compiler with a * rich set of built-in predicates. It offers a fast, robust and small * environment which enables substantial applications to be developed with it. * incorporating feedback from Frans

Re: [oe] [PATCH] gedit: add dependencies enchant & gnome-doc-utils-native

Am Montag, den 11.10.2010, 22:52 +0200 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > 2010/10/11 Andreas Mueller : > > * 'bitbake gedit' on clean system failed during > > * configure: missing enchant > > * compile: gedit.xml unknown "element article" > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Mueller > > --- > > recipes/gnom

[oe] [PATCH 4/4] gedit: add `gnome-doc-utils-native` to `DEPENDS`

From: Andreas Mueller Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:01:58 +0200 Otherwise task `do_compile` fails with the following error. `xml2po` is provided by `gnome-doc-utils-native`. | xsltproc -o gedit-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename gedit --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db

[oe] [PATCH 3/4] gedit: add `enchant` to `DEPENDS`

From: Andreas Mueller Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:01:58 +0200 checking for ENCHANT... no configure: error: Enchant library not found or too old. Use --disable-spell to build without spell plugin. ERROR: Function do_configure failed I build tested this with `minimal-eglibc`

[oe] [PATCH 2/4] gedit: GPLv2+ is the correct the `LICENSE`.

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:55:26 +0200 `COPYING` [1] and the file headers, for example [2], say GPLv2+. Only `README` [3] just mentions GPLv2. [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/COPYING?id=dada4388aa0c33486a6d48ee1c8f2adac67abb01 [2] http://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/gedit/gedit-vi

[oe] [PATCH 1/4] gedit: sort `DEPENDS` alphabetically

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:51:26 +0200 Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel --- recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb b/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb index 83dffcf..eaf9f32 100644 --- a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.

[oe] Wiki moving to OSUOSL

The wiki is moving to the OSUOSL servers at the moment. It should come back in a few hours. DNS is on dotster, and that only updates DNS every four hours. And we don't know when the updates occur, so it could be up to eight. Hopefully, every works in the morning :) Philip ___

Re: [oe] [PATCH] openjade: return oj-native-libosp-fix.patch, lost in BBCLASSEXTEND change fdf02c61607acb5046afaa11c5c682ab99f4d508

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Henning Heinold wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:14:57PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > --- >> >  recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb |    5 +++-- >> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletio

Re: [oe] [PATCH] gedit: add dependencies enchant & gnome-doc-utils-native

2010/10/11 Andreas Mueller : > * 'bitbake gedit' on clean system failed during > * configure: missing enchant > * compile: gedit.xml unknown "element article" > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Mueller > --- >  recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >

Re: [oe] script to remove orphaned files

Dear all, I just pushed the last batch of changes. All recipes dirs have been cleaned except for boost (someone explicitly asked not to clean it; if I recall correctly because he was working on that recipe and that patch). Should something have been moved that should not be moved, feel free to rev

[oe] [PATCH] gedit: add dependencies enchant & gnome-doc-utils-native

* 'bitbake gedit' on clean system failed during * configure: missing enchant * compile: gedit.xml unknown "element article" Signed-off-by: Andreas Mueller --- recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb b/r

Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

> > I'm not sure if it is a policy. Haven't seen it being pulished as such. > Having said that, I have no problems with it (although there is no > problem with enforcing patents or so for v2+ , as that still falls > under the v2 umbrella). > > I guess most of our recipes that say GPLv2 are wrong

Re: [oe] gobject-introspection: pkg-config does not pick correct paths (was: pkg-config does not honor `PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR`)

Am Montag, den 11.10.2010, 03:35 +0200 schrieb Frederik Sdun: > * Paul Menzel [11.10.2010 01:03]: > > Am Montag, den 11.10.2010, 00:47 +0200 schrieb Frederik Sdun: > > > * Paul Menzel [11.10.2010 00:17]: > > > > Am Sonntag, den 10.10.2010, 11:11 -0700 schrieb Chris Larson: > > > > > On Sun, Oct 1

Re: [oe] [RFC] unpackaged files

2010/10/11 Frans Meulenbroeks : > 2010/10/11 J. L. : >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Roman I Khimov wrote: >>> В сообщении от Понедельник 11 октября 2010 15:51:05 автор Frans Meulenbroeks >>> написал:  - a way to indicate that a file is installed but purposedly not packaged (e.g. I h

Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

2010/10/11 Koen Kooi : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11-10-10 20:14, Maupin, Chase wrote: >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org >>> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of >>> Frans Me

[oe] bitbake COMPATIBLE_MACHINE stack backtrace

[this was still in my concepts folder, thought I'd sent it out last week] Hi, If I run bitbake (git head of about a week ago) with a recipe that has COMPATIBLE_MACHINE set and that is not for my machine, I get a bitbake tracedump; Log; fr...@linux-suse:~/oe/openembedded/recipes/zaurus-utils> gr

Re: [oe] [PATCH] openjade: return oj-native-libosp-fix.patch, lost in BBCLASSEXTEND change fdf02c61607acb5046afaa11c5c682ab99f4d508

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Henning Heinold wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:14:57PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > --- > > recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb |5 +++-- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.b

Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

2010/10/11 Maupin, Chase : > >> -Original Message- >> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of >> Frans Meulenbroeks >> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 12:41 PM >> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembed

Re: [oe] [PATCH] openjade: return oj-native-libosp-fix.patch, lost in BBCLASSEXTEND change fdf02c61607acb5046afaa11c5c682ab99f4d508

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:14:57PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > --- > recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb |5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb > b/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb > index 238586b..9462636 100644 > -

Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-10-10 20:14, Maupin, Chase wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of >> Frans Meulenbroeks >> Sent: Monday, Octobe

Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Frans Meulenbroeks > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 12:41 PM > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH

Re: [oe] [RFC] unpackaged files

2010/10/11 J. L. : > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Roman I Khimov wrote: >> В сообщении от Понедельник 11 октября 2010 15:51:05 автор Frans Meulenbroeks >> написал: >>>  - a way to indicate that a file is installed but purposedly not >>> packaged (e.g. I have such a thing in mythtv with a READM

Re: [oe] [RFC] unpackaged files

2010/10/11 Roman I Khimov : > В сообщении от Понедельник 11 октября 2010 15:51:05 автор Frans Meulenbroeks > написал: >>  - a way to indicate that a file is installed but purposedly not >> packaged (e.g. I have such a thing in mythtv with a README file) >> This could be by creating a pseudo-package

[oe] [PATCH v2] cpio: update 2.5 to 2.11

Signed-off-by: Scott Garman --- recipes/cpio/cpio-2.11/statdef.patch | 16 + recipes/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb| 42 +++ recipes/cpio/cpio_2.5.bb | 42 --- recipes/cpio/files/install.patch | 61

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cpio: update 2.5 to 2.11

On 10/11/2010 01:36 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: Am Sonntag, den 10.10.2010, 22:42 -0700 schrieb Scott Garman: Signed-off-by: Scott Garman I build tested your patch for minimal-eglibc for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. Thanks! diff --git a/recipes/cpio/cpio-2.11/statdef.patch b/recipes/cpio/cpio-2.

Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

2010/10/11 Chase Maupin : > * While verifying the licensing for the packages I am building >  into my file system I found that for some packages the >  LICENSE value set in the recipe was either incorrect or >  generic and not detailed enough.  This patch is my attempt >  to update the LICENSE fiel

[oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields

* While verifying the licensing for the packages I am building into my file system I found that for some packages the LICENSE value set in the recipe was either incorrect or generic and not detailed enough. This patch is my attempt to update the LICENSE fields for these packages to match

Re: [oe] testing branch 2010-10-08

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-10-10 17:34, Sledz, Steffen wrote: > On 10/11/2010 09:34 AM, Sledz, Steffen wrote: >> do_configure still fails for epiphany-2.30.2-r3 (see >> ) with: >> >> "checking location of system Certifica

Re: [oe] testing branch 2010-10-08

On 10/11/2010 09:34 AM, Sledz, Steffen wrote: > do_configure still fails for epiphany-2.30.2-r3 (see > ) with: > > "checking location of system Certificate Authority list... > configure: error: could not find. Use --with-ca-file=path > to set, or

Re: [oe] zsafe

Dnia poniedziałek, 11 października 2010 o 13:46:06 Frans Meulenbroeks napisał(a): > 2010/10/11 Marcin Juszkiewicz : > > Dropping that FILES_zsafe = "zsafe" line may be safe - but I would > > suggest doing build to check it. > > As someone who never played with opie, I'll leave it to an expert.

Re: [oe] [PATCH,V2 0/6] libtool 2.4 upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07-10-10 03:46, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > Following set of patches is v2 of the patches adding support for getting > libtool 2.4 into > openemebedded. I have so far built minimal-image for two machines > successfully using old > and new libtool.

Re: [oe] [RFC] unpackaged files

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Roman I Khimov wrote: > В сообщении от Понедельник 11 октября 2010 15:51:05 автор Frans Meulenbroeks > написал: >>  - a way to indicate that a file is installed but purposedly not >> packaged (e.g. I have such a thing in mythtv with a README file) >> This could be

[oe] Membership in the OpenEmbedded eV

As most of you know, there is an OpenEmbedded eV to provide an umbrella organization for handling various aspects of managing the project. There is a description here: http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Organization. We are holding the annual General Assembly on Friday October 30, 2010 aft

[oe] General Assembly 2010 Agenda

I have just created a page on OE wiki to hold the Agenda for 2010 General Assembly. http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/GA2010 I would love to hear from members of any addition discussions that should occur. Or better ordering suggestions. Graeme ___

Re: [oe] [RFC] unpackaged files

В сообщении от Понедельник 11 октября 2010 15:51:05 автор Frans Meulenbroeks написал: > - a way to indicate that a file is installed but purposedly not > packaged (e.g. I have such a thing in mythtv with a README file) > This could be by creating a pseudo-package (like -unused or -ignore) > which

Re: [oe] git & SRCREV

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:49:03PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On 11/10/2010 12:47, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > On 11/10/2010 12:45, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >> Roughly once a week i see a question on irc about someone getting a > >> git error: "fatal: not a valid object name 1" > >> this is

[oe] [RFC] unpackaged files

Dear all, Currently one gets a NOTE if a file is installed but not packaged. However in larger builds this often gets lost. Then again a file installed but not packaged is probably an error. To make things easier trappable and resolvable, I would propose the following: - an option (in due time to

Re: [oe] git & SRCREV

On 11/10/2010 12:47, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On 11/10/2010 12:45, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> Roughly once a week i see a question on irc about someone getting a >> git error: "fatal: not a valid object name 1" >> this is because SRCREV is not defined for e.g. that machine. >> What about extendi

Re: [oe] git & SRCREV

On 11/10/2010 12:45, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Roughly once a week i see a question on irc about someone getting a > git error: "fatal: not a valid object name 1" > this is because SRCREV is not defined for e.g. that machine. > What about extending bitbake (guess it is in there) with an error >

Re: [oe] zsafe

2010/10/11 Marcin Juszkiewicz : > Dnia piątek, 8 października 2010 o 22:54:20 Frans Meulenbroeks napisał(a): >> By incident bumped into zsafe. No idea what it is, but something in >> the recipe drew my attention: >> >> FILES_zsafe = "zsafe" >> >> do_install() { >>         install -d ${D}${palmtopdi

[oe] git & SRCREV

Roughly once a week i see a question on irc about someone getting a git error: "fatal: not a valid object name 1" this is because SRCREV is not defined for e.g. that machine. What about extending bitbake (guess it is in there) with an error message that more clearly explains the problem? Frans __

Re: [oe] gtk+-native: depends somehow on cups-native: `ERROR: Required build target 'gtk+-native' has no buildable providers.`

2010/10/11 Paul Menzel : > Dear OE folks, > > >        $ bitbake evince > > fails with the following error for `angstrom-2010.x` for `MACHINE = > "beagleboard"`. > >        ERROR: Required build target 'evince' has no buildable providers. >        Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['evin

Re: [oe] [solved] gtk+-native: depends somehow on cups-native: `ERROR: Required build target 'gtk+-native' has no buildable providers.`

Am Montag, den 11.10.2010, 13:20 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: > $ bitbake evince > > fails with the following error for `angstrom-2010.x` for `MACHINE = > "beagleboard"`. > > ERROR: Required build target 'evince' has no buildable providers. > Missing or unbuildable dependency

Re: [oe] [PATCH] angstrom.inc: set TARGET_VENDOR ?= "-angstrom"

2010/10/11 Víctor M. Jáquez L. : > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:29:04PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11-10-10 11:33, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal wrote: >> >> By doing this w

Re: [oe] [PATCH] prboom_2.5.0.bb: fix compilation failure due to undefined references.

2010/10/11 Graham Gower : > On 11 October 2010 17:04, Frans Meulenbroeks > wrote: >> Do you feel this is the preferred way? >> I would probably not have made the patch but add -D_GNU_SOURCE to >> CFLAGS. (I like to compile all the sources with the same flags to >> avoid inconsistencies) >> >> Fran

Re: [oe] Building for multiple machines

2010/10/11 Elvis Dowson : > > On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >>> I guess trying this would ahve been much faster than waiting for an answer >>> here. >>> >>> And OE does not have an auto.conf >> >> OE *does* have an auto.conf, pretty much since the start: > > There was a reason

[oe] gtk+-native: depends somehow on cups-native: `ERROR: Required build target 'gtk+-native' has no buildable providers.`

Dear OE folks, $ bitbake evince fails with the following error for `angstrom-2010.x` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. ERROR: Required build target 'evince' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['evince', 'gnome-keyring', 'gtk+-native',

[oe] [PATCH] openjade: return oj-native-libosp-fix.patch, lost in BBCLASSEXTEND change fdf02c61607acb5046afaa11c5c682ab99f4d508

--- recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb b/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb index 238586b..9462636 100644 --- a/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb +++ b/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.

Re: [oe] [PATCH] angstrom.inc: set TARGET_VENDOR ?= "-angstrom"

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:29:04PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11-10-10 11:33, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal wrote: > >> By doing this we could use external toolchains for buil

Re: [oe] [PATCH] angstrom.inc: set TARGET_VENDOR ?= "-angstrom"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-10-10 11:33, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal wrote: >> By doing this we could use external toolchains for build angstrom >> based images. >> > > Ping. Any comment about this patch?

Re: [oe] [PATCH] angstrom.inc: set TARGET_VENDOR ?= "-angstrom"

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal wrote: > By doing this we could use external toolchains for build angstrom > based images. > Ping. Any comment about this patch? vmjl ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-

Re: [oe] [PATCH] prboom_2.5.0.bb: fix compilation failure due to undefined references.

On 11 October 2010 17:04, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Do you feel this is the preferred way? > I would probably not have made the patch but add -D_GNU_SOURCE to > CFLAGS. (I like to compile all the sources with the same flags to > avoid inconsistencies) > > Frans To be honest, I didn't really thi

Re: [oe] zsafe

Dnia piątek, 8 października 2010 o 22:54:20 Frans Meulenbroeks napisał(a): > By incident bumped into zsafe. No idea what it is, but something in > the recipe drew my attention: > > FILES_zsafe = "zsafe" > > do_install() { > install -d ${D}${palmtopdir}/pics/${APPNAME}/ > install -

Re: [oe] Building for multiple machines

On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> I guess trying this would ahve been much faster than waiting for an answer >> here. >> >> And OE does not have an auto.conf > > OE *does* have an auto.conf, pretty much since the start: There was a reason why I didn't try it right away. A w

[oe] OT: git format-patch -M (was: [PATCH] cpio: update 2.5 to 2.11)

Am Sonntag, den 10.10.2010, 22:54 -0700 schrieb Scott Garman: > On 10/10/2010 10:42 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Scott Garman > > --- > > recipes/cpio/cpio-2.11/statdef.patch | 15 > > recipes/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb| 42 +++ > > recipes/cpio

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cpio: update 2.5 to 2.11

Am Sonntag, den 10.10.2010, 22:42 -0700 schrieb Scott Garman: > Signed-off-by: Scott Garman I build tested your patch for minimal-eglibc for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. > --- > recipes/cpio/cpio-2.11/statdef.patch | 15 > recipes/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb| 42 +++

Re: [oe] Building for multiple machines

2010/10/11 Koen Kooi : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11-10-10 08:27, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2010/10/11 Elvis Dowson : >>> Hi, >>>        What should I do build for multiple machines ? >>> >>> I have an overo-oe repository, but I need to temporarily build u-boot for

[oe] [PATCHv3 1/3] kernel bbclass: split do_compile into do_compile and do_compile_modules

This allows recipes to insert a custom task in between building *Image and modules Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi --- classes/kernel.bbclass |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/kernel.bbclass b/classes/kernel.bbclass index cf6b8cd..83e3f44 100644 --- a

[oe] [PATCHv3 2/3] kernel bbclass: make 'kernel-modules' meta-package use RRECOMMENDS to please insane.bbclass

Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi --- classes/kernel.bbclass |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/kernel.bbclass b/classes/kernel.bbclass index 83e3f44..7039d27 100644 --- a/classes/kernel.bbclass +++ b/classes/kernel.bbclass @@ -489,12 +489,12 @@ python

[oe] [PATCHv3 3/3] multi-kernel: adapt to kernel_do_compile_kernelmodules change in kernel.bbclass

--- recipes/linux/multi-kernel.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/linux/multi-kernel.inc b/recipes/linux/multi-kernel.inc index 70cfd87..0523a33 100644 --- a/recipes/linux/multi-kernel.inc +++ b/recipes/linux/multi-kernel.inc @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ do_c

Re: [oe] Building for multiple machines

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-10-10 08:27, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/10/11 Elvis Dowson : >> Hi, >>What should I do build for multiple machines ? >> >> I have an overo-oe repository, but I need to temporarily build u-boot for a >> different board. >> >> In my

Re: [oe] openjade-native build fails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-10-10 05:40, Steve Sakoman wrote: > After commit fdf02c61607acb5046afaa11c5c682ab99f4d508 openjade-native > is failing on a clean build: > > http://build.sakoman.com/public/logs/task/114486.txt > > Any ideas on how to fix this? I've reverted th

Re: [oe] testing branch 2010-10-08

do_configure still fails for epiphany-2.30.2-r3 (see ) with: "checking location of system Certificate Authority list... configure: error: could not find. Use --with-ca-file=path to set, or --without-ca-file to disable" I thought the additional c

Re: [oe] [PATCH] lua, lua-gtk2: move to obsolete.

Graham Gower [2010-10-11 16:54:34]: > Lua fails to build. There are newer recipes (lua5.1) in tree, only > lua-gtk2 uses this old recipe and nothing uses lua-gtk2. I can't give you the ACK, but I totaly agree. Was thinking about the same like week ago, but forget to send a patch :-) -- ynezz _