Related bugzilla entry: http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5510
---
recipes/gnu-config/files/gnu-configize.in |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/gnu-config/files/gnu-configize.in
b/recipes/gnu-config/files/gnu-configize.in
index be8580c..
Just like in apt-native_0.7.20.2.bb.
Related bugzilla entry: http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5511
---
recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb b/recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb
index bd0f41e..b03ef5d 1
Bitbake's pyshlex.py cannot parse it raising NotImplementedError in
line 295 (bitbake @ c8d8388ce9662574a390be3b849c07d1b044275d).
---
classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass b/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass
index
On 2/6/11, Martin Jansa wrote:
> And please rebase it on top of master, as first line was changed few
> days ago, so this won't apply anymore.
Well first line is fixed now and the others are if 0'ed anyway, so I
don't think there is a point in applying it anymore.
I've marked this patch in patc
Bitbake's pyshlex.py cannot parse it raising NotImplementedError in
line 295 (bitbake @ c8d8388ce9662574a390be3b849c07d1b044275d).
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/rootfs_deb.bb
Just like in apt-native_0.7.20.2.bb.
Related bugzilla entry: http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5511
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb b/recipes/apt
On 2/6/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> Just like in apt-native_0.7.20.2.bb.
Sorry for a separate thread, it was meant to go as a reply for
AANLkTiknYT+Ds+0URZXr1+08=8lbd2ekiv2ng3xp-...@mail.gmail.com, but I've
somehow misconfigured git-send-email and it did not ask me for the
message-id t
Manual pages are not being built because doxygen is currently not
supported by openembedded.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/apt/apt-package.inc | 15 +++
recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb |1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/apt
On 2/6/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> Manual pages are not being built because doxygen is currently not
> supported by openembedded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
This patch requires applying http://patches.openembedded.org/patc
line in Dpkg.pm: our $admindir="$ENV{D}/var/dpkg"
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/dpkg/dpkg-native.inc |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/dpkg/dpkg-native.inc b/recipes/dpkg/dpkg-native.inc
index a230f29..f7b243c 100644
--- a/re
path from the shebang
- handle a mix of build host and target host paths
- patch contains a piece from the previous paths.patch
* moved paths.patch application from the main inc file to 1.13.25
recipes
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
.../update-alternatives-native.patch
directory of
the target.
Fixes: mkdir -p the alternatives directory itself and move alternatives
definitions into it before rmdiring the original alternatives directory
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions
This reduces amount of tasks for bootstrap-image from around 3400 to
around 1600 for jlime.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/tasks/task-base.bb |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/tasks/task-base.bb b/recipes/tasks/task-base.bb
index
> On 08-02-11 18:29, Tom Rini wrote:
> Yeah, this patch is wrong, since task-base is supposed to drag in bt and
> wifi when it's available which includes usb, pci, serial, etc.
Shouldn't these optional devices be handled by packages from feed
rather than the bootstrap
On 2/8/11, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Kinda hard to get to the feeds without networking
True, but couldn't we let the distro maintainers decide about this?
For example we at jlime know that feeds will be fetched via wifi and
we do not need bluetooth in the bootstrap image.
bye,
Filip Zy
install packages from the internet".
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
ing bluetooth, or in not including pppd.
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
g better
> then task-bootstrap which we used before. BT/Wifi part was done to have
> support for cf/usb/pci connected dongles/cards. And it worked fine but was
> not
> perfect.
Sure, but why not build it only when the distro/machine has bluetooth
in features?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
ing.
Ok, thanks for the discussion. I still do not agree with the outcome,
but it is not a big problem - I think we will just keep building the
bigger
set to avoid messing stuff up.
Should I mark the patch on patchwork as rejected?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
We use the scsi subsystem for PCMCIA ATA access, so device files are
/dev/sda*, not /dev/hda*.
See recipes/linux/linux-jlime-jornada7xx-2.6.34+git/defconf_jlime:702.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/base-files/base-files/jornada7xx/fstab |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions
this binary is:
/sbin/makedevs -d /etc/device_table /
It surprises me that nobody has noticed this before - is my
configuration somehow unique? Jlime config file isn't overriding much
here...
What is a proper fix for this?
bye,
Filip
On 2/9/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> We use the scsi subsystem for PCMCIA ATA access, so device files are
> /dev/sda*, not /dev/hda*.
> See recipes/linux/linux-jlime-jornada7xx-2.6.34+git/defconf_jlime:702.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
Is there a reason for this patch to
Ah thanks, must have missed it somehow :).
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
On 2/11/11, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 06:44 AM, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
>> On 2/9/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
>>> We use the scsi subsystem for PCMCIA ATA access, so device files are
>>> /dev/s
Makedevs from busybox has a different command line syntax.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/initscripts/initscripts-1.0/devices |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/initscripts/initscripts-1.0/devices
b/recipes/initscripts
Stock ones work better (remounting / rw, makedevs calling).
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
.../initscripts-1.0/jornada7xx/checkroot | 211
.../initscripts/initscripts-1.0/jornada7xx/devices | 70 ---
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 281 deletions
On 2/11/11, Tom Rini wrote:
> Is there a syntax that works for both?
I've looked at the source code of both versions and there is no
compatible syntax.
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedd
dpkg contains of perl modules as well, we need to provide these for
example for update-alternatives.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/dpkg/dpkg.inc |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/dpkg/dpkg.inc b/recipes/dpkg/dpkg.inc
index
tslib and dialog should be pulled in by appropiate dependencies and
wireless-tools comes from wifi in DISTRO_FEATURES.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
conf/distro/jlime-2010.1.conf |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/distro/jlime-2010.1.conf b
E tree.
I didn't want to stir up things too much, so I chose the 'safer' way.
I did it similarly to the way it's done in
recipes/slugos-init/files/turnup.
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-deve
tslib and dialog should be pulled in by appropiate dependencies and
wireless-tools comes from wifi in DISTRO_FEATURES.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
conf/distro/jlime-2010.1.conf |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/distro/jlime-2010.1.conf b
OE generally tries to use /var/dpkg, but the change is missing
in some places, so it is needed to move completely to one of the
options. Keeping the dpkg's default /var/lib/dpkg causes less
maintenance overhead for OE.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/rootfs_deb.bb
makedevs from busybox is installed with priority 50, so the discrete
version of it should be installed with a higher one.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/makedevs/makedevs_1.0.0.bb |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/makedevs
On 2/13/11, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:26:58PM +0100, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> I'm not using dpkg with OE, so personally I don't care, but be aware
> that this change breaks upgrade path for every-package which is using
> u-a. You need another
The whole reposotiry is about 24MB in size and it's rarely needed
whole. It is now splitted into bus specific subpackages (and some
device-specific for devices on a bus like SPI or SBUS) all depended
on by the linux-firmware package.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/linux-fir
This function generates feed configuration for opkg and as such
should be used only for images using ipk, not rpm or deb.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/image.bbclass | 31 ---
classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 31 +++
2
pkgver = ver
and in ncurses_5.7.bb we have:
PATCHDATE = "20110115"
PKGV = "${PV}+${PATCHDATE}"
Isn't this an incosistency that ncurses_5.7-r16 depends on
libtinfo5_5.7+20110115 ? Shouldn't it depend on libtinfo5_5.7-r16?
What's the reason for this situation?
On 2/14/11, Graham Gower wrote:
> In fact the dependency shouldn't be satisfied here. Opkg should fail
> the same way as dpkg is failing.
What should be done then? Should the ncurses recipe be fixed or package.bbclass?
bye,
Filip
intainers) are by definition not able to
know whose products will the user plug in.
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
with USB host - on what
basis do you choose whose products to support?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
This function generates feed configuration for opkg and as such
should be used only for images using ipk, not rpm or deb.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/image.bbclass | 32
classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 33
On 2/14/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> This function generates feed configuration for opkg and as such
> should be used only for images using ipk, not rpm or deb.
Uh, sorry, this wasn't supposed to land here :).
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
O
atch (by me) - split into buses;
2) second patch (by whoever needs this) - furtherly split bus packages
by devices?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailm
into device
packages (so that we can either pull in a whole bus or just one
device).
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb | 144 +-
1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux-firmware/
Using PV/PR causes problems like libncursesw5_5.7-r16 depending on
libtinfo5 (>= 5.7+20110115).
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/package_deb.bbclass b/classes/package_deb.bbcl
Both package_deb.bbclass and rootfs_deb.bbclass use apt-get.
Without apt system cannot be bootstrapped because there is no optimal
way to fetch new packages. Apt depends on dpkg, so switching from dpkg
to apt in EXTRA_DEPENDS provides both.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes
PKGR already contains DISTRO_PR, so no need to add it twice.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/package_deb.bbclass b/classes/package_deb.bbclass
index 1f36246..60e759d 100644
--- a
co/orinoco_cs.ko
Of course 'kernel/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_cs.ko' !=
'/lib/modules/2.6.34/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_cs.ko'
which causes my problem.
What can be done to fix this? How did it get broken (last week or so)?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
BTW, I am using linux-jlime-jornada7xx_2.6.34+git.bb to build the kernel.
On 2/17/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lately I have noticed that the bootstrap image I build contains the
> orinoco-cs.ko kernel module, but doesn't contain orinoco.ko (which is
> depended
get_dependencies() searched for a filename key in dependencies
directory with the /lib/modules/kernel_version prefix while
the directory had entries stripped of it.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/kernel.bbclass |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
e is armel?
First solution may cause some problems with dpkg not expecting this
value on a particular system, the second means potential bugs
resulting from a deeper change in OpenEmbedded.
What do you think?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-dev
For dpkg EABI system architecture is called armel, not arm.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/package_deb.bbclass b/classes/package_deb.bbclass
index 60e759d..87f31fa 100644
--- a
l 2006, the name
"armel" was chosen. If a bigendian arm EABI port will be created, it
will be called "armeb", and it will replace the previous oldabi-based
"armeb" port effort.
==
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Ope
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
conf/machine/jornada6xx.conf |2 ++
conf/machine/jornada7xx.conf |2 ++
conf/machine/mp900c.conf |2 ++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/machine/jornada6xx.conf b/conf/machine/jornada6xx.conf
index 734cacd
Relative path causes dpkg's update-alternatives to ignore this
alternative.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
recipes/less/less_436.bb |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/less/less_436.bb b/recipes/less/less_436.bb
index 711abfd..c62c821 1
For dpkg EABI system architecture is called armel, not arm.
Reference: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |2 ++
recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb | 13 -
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a
For dpkg EABI system architecture is called armel, not arm.
Reference: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |2 ++
recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb | 21 -
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff
For dpkg EABI system architecture is called armel, not arm.
Reference: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |2 ++
recipes/apt/apt_0.7.20.2.bb | 21 -
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff
it please get rid of do_stage
I've removed it and resulting package has the same contents, so removed it is.
I have just realised that I've skipped increasing PR, I'll send a
fixed one in a minute.
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Op
Hi,
On 2/14/11, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
> The whole reposotiry is about 24MB in size and it's rarely needed
> whole. It is now splitted into bus specific subpackages (and some
> device-specific for devices on a bus like SPI or SBUS) all depended
> on by the linux-firmware packa
b3b6ee10ace8_all.deb
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/package_deb.bbclass b/classes/package_deb.bbclass
index 87f31fa..f94771c 100644
--- a/classes/package_deb.bbclass
+++ b/classes
On 2/23/11, Koen Kooi wrote:
> The wl12xx files need to go into /lib/firmware, not
> /lib/firmware/ti-connectivity
This layout is copied verbatim from the linux-firmware git repository.
Maybe I'll just report it upstream?
bye,
Filip
lip.zyzniewski@jlime:/home/git/linux-hpc/drivers$
Could you move these files to a location requested by the kernel?
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
-p25.bb
So you suggest removing recipes/linux-firmware altogether?
If so, recipes/firmwares/linux-firmware.inc would need a lot of
reshaping to provide what I need (bus specific packages).
bye,
Filip Zyzniewski
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Ope
Until now the Packages.gz generation was hardcoded in rootfs_deb_do_rootfs.
Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski
---
classes/package_deb.bbclass | 28
classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass |5 -
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes
64 matches
Mail list logo
