On 11/16/15 11:10 AM, akuster808 wrote:
>
>
> On 11/16/2015 03:24 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
> Making a separate repository with this
On 11/16/2015 03:24 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin
> wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and
complicates
On 12 November 2015 at 18:59, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > There is already enough meta-oe bloat moved from oe-core:
> > >
> > >
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112665.html
> > >
> > > WARN: qt-mobility-embedded: qt-mobility-embedded
On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
1) or even better in a separate repo
To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo myself. It
would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and much earlier with
Qt 3.
Agreed.
I'm also fine with separate layer.
On 16.11.2015 10:43, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> 1) or even better in a separate repo
To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo
myself. It
would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> 1) or even better in a separate repo
To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo
myself. It
would be
On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and
complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle those.
So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if there is no
official maintainer or
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>>> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and
>>> complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle
>>>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Thursday 12 November 2015 18:03:27 Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:39:15AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 November 2015 18:03:27 Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM,
>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:34PM +0200, alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4 recipes out of oe-core.
> This has been discussed previously here:
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-June/106355.html
>
>
> There is already enough meta-oe bloat moved from oe-core:
>
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112665.html
>
> WARN: qt-mobility-embedded: qt-mobility-embedded rdepends on glib-2.0, but
> it isn't a build dependency?
If increasing bloat is a problem, why
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4 recipes out of oe-core.
> This has been discussed previously here:
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-June/106355.html
>
> I'm not
On Thursday 12 November 2015 18:03:27 Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4 recipes out of oe-core.
> > This has been discussed previously here:
> >
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:38:58PM +0200, alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> > There is already enough meta-oe bloat moved from oe-core:
> >
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112665.html
> >
> > WARN: qt-mobility-embedded: qt-mobility-embedded
15 matches
Mail list logo