Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/16/15 11:10 AM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 11/16/2015 03:24 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin >> wrote: >>> On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> > Making a separate repository with this

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread akuster808
On 11/16/2015 03:24 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and complicates

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Burton, Ross
On 12 November 2015 at 18:59, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > There is already enough meta-oe bloat moved from oe-core: > > > > > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112665.html > > > > > > WARN: qt-mobility-embedded: qt-mobility-embedded

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: 1) or even better in a separate repo To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo myself. It would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and much earlier with Qt 3. Agreed. I'm also fine with separate layer.

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 16.11.2015 10:43, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > 1) or even better in a separate repo To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo myself. It would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > 1) or even better in a separate repo To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo myself. It would be

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if there is no official maintainer or

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/16/2015 01:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >>> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and >>> complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle >>>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-13 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 12 November 2015 18:03:27 Andreas Müller wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-13 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:39:15AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > On Thursday 12 November 2015 18:03:27 Andreas Müller wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-12 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:34PM +0200, alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com wrote: > Hello, > > now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4 recipes out of oe-core. > This has been discussed previously here: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-June/106355.html > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-12 Thread alexander . kanavin
> There is already enough meta-oe bloat moved from oe-core: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112665.html > > WARN: qt-mobility-embedded: qt-mobility-embedded rdepends on glib-2.0, but > it isn't a build dependency? If increasing bloat is a problem, why

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-12 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4 recipes out of oe-core. > This has been discussed previously here: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-June/106355.html > > I'm not

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 12 November 2015 18:03:27 Andreas Müller wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:45 PM, wrote: > > Hello, > > > > now that 2.0 is out, it's time to move the Qt4 recipes out of oe-core. > > This has been discussed previously here: > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?

2015-11-12 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:38:58PM +0200, alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > There is already enough meta-oe bloat moved from oe-core: > > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112665.html > > > > WARN: qt-mobility-embedded: qt-mobility-embedded