On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
ping. Can this now be merged ?
Yes ;-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
ping. Can this now be merged ?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015 10:37 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani d...@pseudoterminal.org
wrote:
The latest one (V8) seems good to me. I was initially skeptical about the
heavy chromium.inc refactoring, but
The latest one (V8) seems good to me. I was initially skeptical about
the heavy chromium.inc refactoring, but these days we don't have
multiple chromium versions in meta-browser, so it is okay.
The shared object versioning bandaid wasn't done by me, I modified other
parts, but I agree with the
On Apr 29, 2015 10:37 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani d...@pseudoterminal.org
wrote:
The latest one (V8) seems good to me. I was initially skeptical about the
heavy chromium.inc refactoring, but these days we don't have multiple
chromium versions in meta-browser, so it is okay.
The shared object
Looks like some regressions may have crept back relative previous
versions of the patch?
- dubious indent in do_install()
- .pak files being installed as executables
- dev-so INSANE_SKIP shouldn't be requied
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
CEF is a
On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Andre McCurdy armccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like some regressions may have crept back relative previous
versions of the patch?
- dubious indent in do_install()
- .pak files being installed as executables
- dev-so INSANE_SKIP shouldn't be requied
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Thanks for bringing it up. I will send a followup to fix it incrementally.
Please wait for Carlos comments and send a new pathc revision. This is
not yet merged so fixes are still possible.
sent a V6
--
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Andre McCurdy armccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like some regressions may have crept back relative previous
versions of the patch?
- dubious indent in do_install()
- .pak files being installed
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
CEF is a framework to embed chromium based browsers into other
applications
Change-Id: Ieabae43042101331f67cf6e673391f6fe320561f
Signed-off-by: pnandyala pavan.nandy...@lnttechservices.com
Signed-off-by: knagabhirava
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
- proper patch headers
can you point to patch header guidelines for meta-browser ?
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
- proper patch headers
can you point to patch header guidelines for meta-browser ?
Same as OE in general[1].
1.
On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
wrote:
- proper patch headers
can you point to patch header
12 matches
Mail list logo
