On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> > I don't have strong opinion about keeping/loosing .inc files, but
> > I've removed couple of .inc files when importing stuff from OE-Classic
> > in cases where .inc is relatively short (like in smartmontools).
> >
> > I would keep .inc wh
On 05/03/2013 11:09 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:42:30PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Friday 03 May 2013 16:30:17 Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> I agree we should try to keep only one version of each recipe in
> so
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:42:30PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 03 May 2013 16:30:17 Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > > I agree we should try to keep only one version of each recipe in
> > > > software
> > > > layers, however I figure it
On Friday 03 May 2013 16:40:13 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 3 mei 2013, om 16:35 heeft Paul Eggleton
> het volgende geschreven:
> > IMO, let's keep the separate inc file, but drop PR and INC_PR.
>
> I still haven't heard a compelling case why smartmontools needs a .inc and
> all the other recipes in met
On Friday 03 May 2013 16:30:17 Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > I agree we should try to keep only one version of each recipe in
> > > software
> > > layers, however I figure it makes it easier for people to carry their
> > > own
> > > versions of rec
Op 3 mei 2013, om 16:35 heeft Paul Eggleton het
volgende geschreven:
> On Friday 03 May 2013 16:00:13 Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Nicolas Dechesne
>>
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Paul Eggleton
>>>
>>> wrote:
>> On Friday 26 April 2013 23
Op 3 mei 2013, om 16:30 heeft Paul Eggleton het
volgende geschreven:
> On Friday 03 May 2013 16:10:40 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 27 apr. 2013, om 13:13 heeft Paul Eggleton
> het volgende geschreven:
>>> On Saturday 27 April 2013 06:34:46 Philip Balister wrote:
On 04/27/2013 04:24 AM, Paul Eg
On Friday 03 May 2013 16:00:13 Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Nicolas Dechesne
>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Paul Eggleton
> >
> > wrote:
> >>> > On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>> >> And do you really need a .inc?
> >>> >
> >>
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > I agree we should try to keep only one version of each recipe in software
> > layers, however I figure it makes it easier for people to carry their own
> > versions of recipes in distro layers (particularly older, which may be
> > required in ce
On Friday 03 May 2013 16:10:40 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 27 apr. 2013, om 13:13 heeft Paul Eggleton
het volgende geschreven:
> > On Saturday 27 April 2013 06:34:46 Philip Balister wrote:
> >> On 04/27/2013 04:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >>> On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
> A
Op 27 apr. 2013, om 13:13 heeft Paul Eggleton
het volgende geschreven:
> On Saturday 27 April 2013 06:34:46 Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 04/27/2013 04:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
And do you really need a .inc?
>>>
>>> Are we removing i
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Nicolas Dechesne
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
>>> > On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> >> And do you really need a .inc?
>>> >
>>> > Are we removing inc files if they were present in OE Classic? First I've
>>>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
>> > On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> >> And do you really need a .inc?
>> >
>> > Are we removing inc files if they were present in OE Classic? First I've
>> > heard if we are...
>>
>> If we are trying to reduce the number o
On Saturday 27 April 2013 06:34:46 Philip Balister wrote:
> On 04/27/2013 04:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> And do you really need a .inc?
> >
> > Are we removing inc files if they were present in OE Classic? First I've
> > heard if we are...
On 04/27/2013 04:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Op 26-04-13 22:39, Nicolas Dechesne schreef:
>>> Import smartmontools recipe from OE classic, and updated to upstream
>>> v5.40.
>>>
>>> Also ad
On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 26-04-13 22:39, Nicolas Dechesne schreef:
> > Import smartmontools recipe from OE classic, and updated to upstream
> > v5.40.
> >
> > Also added cosmetic changes in the recipe: INC_PR suppor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 26-04-13 22:39, Nicolas Dechesne schreef:
> Import smartmontools recipe from OE classic, and updated to upstream
> v5.40.
>
> Also added cosmetic changes in the recipe: INC_PR support and homepage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne ---
> meta-
Import smartmontools recipe from OE classic, and updated to upstream v5.40.
Also added cosmetic changes in the recipe: INC_PR support and homepage.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/smartmontools/smartmontools.inc | 10 ++
meta-oe/recipes-support/smartmonto
18 matches
Mail list logo
