Re: [Openerp-community] Could oca adopt report_webkit before v8

On 03/30/2015 11:06 AM, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero wrote: I don't understand. Module /report_webkit/ is still on official repository (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/tree/8.0/addons/report_webkit). It seems that the move has been delayed until 9.0. Why do you need to copy it to another place? Exact

[Openerp-community] Odoo Security Advisory - 2014-01-safe-eval

Security Advisory 2014-01-safe-eval Title: Arbitrary code execution using safe eval expressions Affects: All Odoo (formerly OpenERP) versions Component: Odoo Server Credit: "duesenfranz" GitHub: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/3445 I. Background Odo

[Openerp-community] Odoo 8 has just been released!

Dear Community, Odoo 8 has just been released! You can try it online immediately on https://www.odoo.com/start and download the final release on https://www.odoo.com/page/download More information: - Announce: http://bit.ly/1miy5K2 - Presentation: https://www.odoo.com/openerp_website/stati

[Openerp-community] Update on 8.0 release status

Hi everyone! Here's another quick update about the 8.0 release status. - Odoo.com has been running on 8.0 RC1 for several weeks and has become quite stable after a lot of improvements and corrections. - The translation teams have been doing an incredible job and several teams have almost rea

[Openerp-community] Odoo 8.0: Call for translators

Dear contributors and translators, As you know, we're working hard to prepare the v8 release and make it as stable as possible. We've done a lot of progress and we're reaching the point where we plan to migrate odoo.com to 8.0RC. It should be done next week if everything goes well. This would

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~camptocamp/openobject-doc/6.1-add-outdated-links-warning-lep into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/6.1

Thanks, btw you're welcome to commit directly in the branch. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/openobject-doc/6.1-add-outdated-links-warning-lep/+merge/229473 Your team OpenERP Community is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~camptocamp/openobject-doc/6.1-add-outdated-links-warn

Re: [Openerp-community] new api, v8 release

Hi, Quick update on the 8.0 release progress: - the migration scripts for 8.0 are finished, and Odoo.com should be upgraded in the coming days - the new packaging is almost finished, new nightly builds should appear soon on nightly.odoo.com - the export of the translations is being worked on, b

Re: [Openerp-community] Individual column filtering in Odoo

On 06/19/2014 01:27 PM, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero wrote: I agree with Olivier that the way to go if you want to search directly for certain field is to include it as a search field on the view, and going down with the arrows, but please improve saved filters, recreating in the same form as you pu

Re: [Openerp-community] Individual column filtering in Odoo

On 06/19/2014 12:21 PM, Ana Juaristi wrote: Hello everybody: My feeling is that Oscar's idea would be really usefull for old and new users. Very simple case of use (now testing projects/tasks) on Odoo: I want to look for tasks of a single project. I need doing this actions on screen: 1. click o

Re: [Openerp-community] Individual column filtering in Odoo

On 06/18/2014 07:01 PM, Oscar Alcala wrote: The odoo team already did some improvements on the search Omnibox: Inline image 2 This is a great feature, but I still think that can it can get better it feels really weird clicking on a dropdown and suddenly seeing a

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP launchpad bug list ?

On 06/06/2014 11:28 AM, Yann Papouin wrote: According to the transition wiki page: "LP bugs stay on LP, but no new ones. New bugs = GitHub issues" https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/GitHub-Transition The top of the transition page is just a summary with links to more detailed sections further d

Re: [Openerp-community] git: branch names

On 06/10/2014 04:08 PM, Sandy Carter wrote: Slashes in git branch names can cause problems with some helper tools as it messes up the .git/refs/ directory. That's exactly why we have decided to avoid it ;-) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~op

Re: [Openerp-community] Transition to GitHub

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Nhomar Hernández wrote: > 2014-05-23 12:51 GMT-05:00 Olivier Dony : >> >> >> Yes we'll create similar labels, this will be defined soon and the process >> explained on the wiki. >> >> Cfr https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wi

Re: [Openerp-community] Transition to GitHub

On 05/22/2014 11:01 PM, Graeme Gellatly wrote: Just a question about transition to github and the single branch. Should we consider renaming addons b4 v8 release?, seems a funny name now given we talk of apps and modules and they are core to using the software not really an add on. The differe

Re: [Openerp-community] Transition to GitHub

On 05/23/2014 07:27 PM, Nhomar Hernández wrote: Hello Oliver. I have 2 questions, to help improve the process on github. 1. - Define how "label" bugs to take off from you some noise bugs which are invalids or fetures requests. (In launchpad we had the "wishlist" tags and the "won't fix" and so

Re: [Openerp-community] Transition to GitHub

On 05/22/2014 09:44 AM, Nhomar Hernández wrote: Oliver. What about lp:openobject-doc? We'll probably move it to a separate GitHub repo, because it could benefit from the online preview and edit capabilities there. I don't suppose many people depend on it being at its current location. We h

Re: [Openerp-community] Transition to GitHub

On 05/21/2014 12:24 PM, Moises Lopez wrote: Where you comment: "3. Runbot [In Progress] New runbot with GitHub integration will be ready soon." Will you add support for GitHub repositories while preserving bzr compatibility too? The new runbot currently only supports GitHub, and it's not sure y

[Openerp-community] Transition to GitHub

Hi everyone, The transition from Launchpad to GitHub has just been announced, and it raises many questions. First of all: Don't Panic!(TM) We should not lose anything in the process, and no urgent action is required on your side. The new Odoo wiki at GitHub attempts to give a comprehensive

Re: [Openerp-community] Embed video using website builder?

On 05/09/2014 04:52 PM, Ana Juaristi wrote: Just a very simple question... is there anyway to embed a video (youtube, flash or so on) using only V8 website builder on user level? That is without editing html view? is there any widget that allows doing that? On the other side... How could upload v

Re: [Openerp-community] [Openerp-expert-accounting] Help openerp V8 ECommerce PLeeeeease

On 04/29/2014 02:54 AM, Hachem Chraiti wrote: Hi, im trying to add some products in the Ecommerce module but after adding them to the cart and while validation it show me 404 Error !! "The page you were looking for could not be found; it is possible you have typed the address incorrectly, but it

Re: [Openerp-community] Reason to deprecate check_recursion() ?

On 03/31/2014 03:24 PM, Lionel Sausin wrote: Le 31/03/2014 14:57, Lionel Sausin a écrit : Dear Olivier, In v7 I just noticed that check_recursion() is deprecated in favor of _check_recursion(). That makes it a protected method, so by convention it should only be used inside osv.orm shouldn't it?

Re: [Openerp-community] Tagged versions 7.0 and 6.1 run red on runbot

On 03/14/2014 10:42 AM, Lionel Sausin wrote: Do you think you could do the following, at least for the supported releases? - find the earliest revision of the release-branch (ie. openobject-addons/7.0) which runs green on runbot (I can help with this if you want) - tag it with something like "7.0

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP web and v8 Website Builder

On 03/06/2014 02:53 PM, Alejandro Santana wrote: I wonder if the new Website Builder can comply with European Union cookies policy. I mean, the mandatory warn banner/message/whatever to inform the user about cookie usage. Will OpenERP Website Builder support that? Well, nothing in the Website B

Re: [Openerp-community] What should I do with improvement proposals?

On 03/06/2014 06:20 PM, Lionel Sausin wrote: One example : https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe/openobject-addons/trunk-sale-order-dates/+merge/175249 I did my home work and gathered all the community patches and pieces of advice I could, and made a clean patch. I remember reviewing it at t

Re: [Openerp-community] report_webkit future

On 02/18/2014 11:53 AM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote: Nicolas, I can't see how you can compare wkhtmltopdf and qweb ? Wouldn't it make more sense to compare jinja2 with qweb ? Comparing QWeb to Jinja2 is more accurate indeed. As you probably know, v8 will introduce a reporting engine based on QWeb

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP New Website: Community Page

On 02/05/2014 08:26 AM, Alexandre Fayolle wrote: There is also a fairly active chan #openobject on irc.freenode.org (which could do with more active experienced developers, including people from OpenERP SA) For the record, we've recently added #openobject to BotBot, so we now have a nice front

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP CMS: How is server separation implemented?

On 01/20/2014 10:13 PM, Kurt Haselwimmer wrote: Say I create a new feature for the webstore, say even - the shipment tracking feature I described - whereby I can store parameter trackno, together with a courier choice, such that the URL www.courier.com/tracking.asp?id=%s

Re: [Openerp-community] Portal partner rule bug

On 01/15/2014 03:56 PM, Axel Mendoza Pupo wrote: This bug is related with search on model res.partner when the module portal is installed because of an ir.rule of res.partner in that module security Suppose that there is an extension of res.partner that add one or more many2one fields to res.user

[Openerp-community] [Bug 1199386] Re: Email address regular expression needs work

Hi, This has been fixed in addons 7.0 at revision 9764 rev-id: o...@openerp.com-20140115093120-r2u2bmms9y847b93, using the corrected email_split function. As a result, updating both server and addons 7.0 to the latest version will get you the complete fix. Concerning the server-part of the big

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~camptocamp/openerp-product-attributes/port-add-product_multi_company_7.0-bis-jge into lp:openerp-product-attributes

On 2013-11-01 03:02, Martin Collins wrote: On 2013-10-31 19:15, Fabrice Henrion wrote: If you are interested and willing to help on this, we can run a round of Americanization on the terminology in OpenERP (like we did successfully before the v7 release). I can set up a pad where you could poin

Re: [Openerp-community] translations for 6.1 messed up

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Holger Brunn wrote: > In https://bugs.launchpad.net/ocb-server/+bug/1170129, I went through the > pain > to find out the revision from which on it went wrong, the same has yet to > be > done with openobject-addons. > > Now my question is: How did 7.0's pot-file e

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Stefan Rijnhart wrote: > On 10/28/2013 11:07 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote: > > - one can not use it in production since you can not easily do "bzr pull" > to apply latest bugfixes > > I don't even know what you mean by this. I pull OCB-branches on a daily > basis.

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Stefan Rijnhart wrote: > On 10/28/2013 08:30 PM, Olivier Dony wrote: > >> >> So it's very simple: if the OCB contributors find it useful to have a >> faster commit path to the stable branches, then they might find that >> resp

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Stefan wrote: > Hi, > > to put this discussion in perspective, let me give an overview of which > schema changes have been put through in ocb-addons/7.0 so far: > > - An 'active' field was added to account.journal > - A sequence field was added to account.tax > -

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume < joel.grandguilla...@camptocamp.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > A bit late, but better late than never... I completly share Stefan's > vision here. I'm also inline with what suggested Olivier during the > community days ans I'm also happy to see t

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Moises Lopez wrote: > Hello Oliver, > > Current openerp-runbot there is hard-code for sticky branches. > Actually, this can be configured dynamically too. But first the team config must be clean. > I modified this file for explain this point: > > > https://docs

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Moises Lopez wrote: > @Fabien, > > You told us > """ > > And this is the main reason why you need to register a *team*, and not a > branch. This allows to control feature-branches are green before merging > them. > ... > """ > We generate branches with info f

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On 2013-10-25 17:43, Mario Arias wrote: Reason to be for OCB branches is that official ones are not "community friendly"... * Lots of bugs with even corresponding MPs that are rejected and/or ignored... * Changes needed to really fix a bug that are not accepted because of the "no change

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On 2013-10-25 16:44, Stefan wrote: On 10/25/2013 04:21 PM, Olivier Dony wrote: Only a few obstacles remain before this can become a reality: 1/ The OCB branches would need to be relocated under the official projects 2/ The OCB branch management process needs to be adapted accordingly 3

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On 2013-10-25 16:45, Nhomar Hernández wrote: 2013/10/25 Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero mailto:pedro.ba...@gmail.com>> I know too about runbot availability to run locally downloading source code, but the added value of runbot is to have it on-line, as Travis CI does. Anyway, I also see mo

Re: [Openerp-community] Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

On 2013-10-25 14:30, Fabien Pinckaers wrote: Ok, I checked with Olivier and Christophe; It looks like OCB branches have been wrongly registered in our runbot by a partner. IMHO, the community should organize OCB branches in another way: - a dedicated ~ocb team - but uses official projects

Re: [Openerp-community] reorderable lines on purchase.orders, account.invoice, stock.picking

On 10/02/2013 04:50 PM, Raphael Valyi wrote: just to mention we negociated for Aflex OPW renewal that o2m would be sortable on client side, it has been written as one of the regression to fix in the renewal contract to bought to OpenERP. So I think this is related to this: when you click on the h

Re: [Openerp-community] reorderable lines on purchase.orders, account.invoice, stock.picking

On 10/01/2013 07:10 PM, ferdinand wrote: On 10/01/2013 03:16 PM, Olivier Dony wrote: Is there any new version of one2many_sorted? The one I can see [1] does not perform any sorting or grouping on the client-side, so it does not seem to address the limitations I was referring to?? [1] http

Re: [Openerp-community] reorderable lines on purchase.orders, account.invoice, stock.picking

On 09/24/2013 06:14 PM, ferdinand wrote: On 09/24/2013 05:05 PM, Olivier Dony wrote: [1] That's harder than it seems - it requires client-side logic/grouping because some of the lines in a o2m may be dirty or new, so the server would be unable to perform the sorting. that's why

Re: [Openerp-community] reorderable lines on purchase.orders, account.invoice, stock.picking

On 09/24/2013 07:17 PM, antonio.seque...@multibase.pt wrote: We have developed the attached module to order Sales Order lines, by creating a group of lines and give it a title and a sequence inside the group - the name of the group is the title. The ordered lines are shown in the print form also

Re: [Openerp-community] reorderable lines on purchase.orders, account.invoice, stock.picking

On 09/24/2013 01:38 PM, Alan Lord wrote: https://lists.launchpad.net/openerp-community/msg01313.html (4th Oct 2012)... Interesting that Olivier said in his first reply to this thread that "- line ordering propagates throughout the workflow by default" Yup, as mentioned, that was the plan. An

Re: [Openerp-community] reorderable lines on purchase.orders, account.invoice, stock.picking

On 09/24/2013 10:33 AM, Alexandre Fayolle wrote: * For invoices, the sequence field is there on the lines but not editable, and only set by default from sale.orders AFAICT. The preferred method to allow reordering lines is to simply add the `sequence` field in the editable list view, using wid

Re: [Openerp-community] Usability features branches

On 09/16/2013 03:05 PM, "Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe" wrote: Le 16/09/2013 14:35, Olivier Dony a écrit : One thing that's easily overlooked is that OpenERP is a very complex piece of software, and the R&D team spent *a lot* of eff

Re: [Openerp-community] Usability features branches

On 09/16/2013 02:52 PM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote: For the rest, it might be better to put them in extra modules and offer a configuration interface similar to v7's "Settings" checkboxes, possibly via an index module, as Niels suggests. But you should watch out for updatability - a

Re: [Openerp-community] Usability features branches

On 09/16/2013 09:26 AM, "Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe" wrote: Hi, Personnally, I would most appreciate if you made merge proposals to the trunk when applicable. I known OpenERP SA is not reactive to this type of MP's (I have made quite a few myself that not be

Re: [Openerp-community] [Openerp-community-reviewer] Removing inactive members from the reviewers team

just a fact and doesn't affect any skills or value: Borja López Soilán : https://launchpad.net/~borjals Jordi Esteve : jest...@zikzakmedia.com <mailto:jest...@zikzakmedia.com> Raphaël Valyi : https://launchpad.net/~rvalyi Olivier Dony: o...@tinyerp.com <mailto:o...@tinyerp.com>

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-server/7.0_improve_tree_view_doc-afe into lp:openobject-server/7.0

Review: Approve Look great now, thanks! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-server/7.0_improve_tree_view_doc-afe/+merge/183382 Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch lp:~openerp-community/openobject-server/7.0_improve_tree_view_doc-afe. _

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-server/7.0_improve_tree_view_doc-afe into lp:openobject-server/7.0

Review: Needs Fixing Good point, thanks! While adding this, it might be worth indicating more precisely which kind of view supports it (kanban, tree, form, gantt), the full list of available options: `create|edit|delete`, and the fact that the system will automatically set default values for t

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

On 09/03/2013 02:25 PM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote: Worth mentioning if the search will also match ['foo', 'bar'] when given "foo" i suppose? Yes, as you can easily test for yourself ;-) Just be mindful of the series filter when you do so. We're in the process of adding a default "All" series

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

On 09/03/2013 09:17 AM, Lorenzo Battistini wrote: how are multiple module authors handled by the new apps platform? We thought we had to use a list of strings, but this doesn't seem to be considered: https://apps.openerp.com/apps/7.0/account_vat_period_end_statement/ Will multiple authors be su

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

On 08/19/2013 11:36 AM, Eric Caudal wrote: Thanks for the feedback. Can you check this page: http://help.openerp.com/question/1078/how-to-integrate-openerp-v7-with-google-calendar/ When I try to click on link 2 and 3 of the answer, I get a "Page Not found" Thanks. When you click on the link you

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

On 08/15/2013 09:32 AM, Eric Caudal wrote: The v6apps.openerp.com has disappeared: I can understand the need to switch to the new repository but one side effect is that all current link in the web are not redirected to the new repository... That is a huge loss in terms of knowledge base and legac

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

On 08/13/2013 11:35 AM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote: b) I want to know how to manage the community branches repositories... I can register them only using my Camptocamp account/login which is obviously not the purpose at all ! Can we have a login for the OCA in order to manage the community work a

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

On 08/13/2013 11:00 AM, Bidoul, Stéphane wrote: > A quick question. It seems apps.openerp.com > ignores the installable flag in module descriptors. > > The community uses this flag to mark modules that are on a series branch but > not in a usable state (yet) because, for

[Openerp-community] OpenERP Apps v7.0 is live

Hello everyone, We are glad to announce that the new OpenERP Apps platform has finally been launched today on http://apps.openerp.com It now fully replaces the former "v6apps" version, and you can proceed to register your v7.0 modules immediately. Most previously registered repositories and br

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/gjanssens_l10n_be_nl into lp:openobject-addons

Review: Needs Fixing Hi Geert, Thanks a lot for your work, and sorry we were not able to reply earlier. You did well for the publishing of your patch, and the diff shown on this merge proposal simply indicates conflicts in the nl_BE.po file because of the way Launchpad is managing the translat

[Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/gjanssens_l10n_be_nl into lp:openobject-addons

The proposal to merge lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/gjanssens_l10n_be_nl into lp:openobject-addons has been updated. Description changed to: - Make Belgian account and tax templates translatable - Provide Flemish translation of these templates For more details see http://forum.opener

Re: [Openerp-community] Major security patch for all versions of PostgreSQL

On 05/03/2013 10:07 PM, Ray Carnes wrote: We are considering releasing a security update for OpenERP to prevent exploiting the vulnerability even >>on unpatched PostgreSQL versions. Has a decision been made about this yet? Will OpenERP be releasing a security update? Or is the recommended cour

Re: [Openerp-community] Major security patch for all versions of PostgreSQL

On 04/04/2013 04:53 PM, Marco Dieckhoff wrote: Am 04.04.2013 16:40, schrieb Brendan Clune: Something which affects us all... http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1456/ Sadly, it looks like neither Ubuntu 12.04 (Server, LTS) nor Debian Wheezy/Sid has a version newer than the ones mentioned ab

[Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openerp-web/trunk-bug-1104118-chintan into lp:openerp-web

The proposal to merge lp:~openerp-community/openerp-web/trunk-bug-1104118-chintan into lp:openerp-web has been updated. Status: Needs review => Rejected For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openerp-web/trunk-bug-1104118-chintan/+merge/149979 -- https://code.

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openerp-web/trunk-bug-1104118-chintan into lp:openerp-web

Review: Abstain Hello, Thanks for your contribution, however I'm afraid the bug was fixed in the mean time, and we ended up keeping checkboxes because radio buttons are impractical when you change your mind and you suddenly don't want to check either option. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ope

Re: [Openerp-community] ERROR

On 02/22/2013 03:26 AM, Syllas F. de O. Neto wrote: I’m trying to read the modules description clicking on its names in Application section but I’m getting this error message: ProgrammingError: column loempia_module.license does not exist LINE 1: ...",loempia_module."approved",loempia_module."n

Re: [Openerp-community] UTC and date fields.

On 02/14/2013 04:54 PM, Arturo Galvan Rdz. wrote: Since the server uses UTC, whenever an account_move gets created after 5 p.m. its date is set to the next day. That wouldn't be a problem if the date field of the account.move object were of the type datetime. In that case we would add (or sub

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP: Partners Collaboration Model

See also the explanations on http://doc.openerp.com/v6.1/contribute/05_developing_modules.html#community-addons and http://doc.openerp.com/v6.1/contribute/02_working_in_teams.html#community-contributor-teams -- Olivier Dony OpenERP Belgium On 02/07/2013 10:46 AM, Bertrand Hanot wrote:

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/gscom-70-l10n-vn into lp:openobject-addons/7.0

Review: Needs Information @Stefan: thanks a lot for the reviews! @Tien Tran: your merge proposal looks very good to me now, thanks to Stefan's excellent review. My only remaining questions are: - Your module depends on both "base_iban" and "base_vat". Do you actually require these modules for

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix-1100271-membership-invoice-form-view into lp:openobject-addons/7.0

Review: Approve Thanks for the quick update! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix-1100271-membership-invoice-form-view/+merge/143504 Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix-1100271-membership-invoice-form-v

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/fix-1100271-membership-invoice-form-view into lp:openobject-addons/7.0

Review: Needs Fixing Thanks for the bug report and the patch. One small thing is incorrect (and was in fact not correct in the original code either): when resolving external IDs with ir.model.data.get_object_reference() there is always a chance of getting a ValueError if the record has been ma

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-server/fix-1096138-babel-extract-method-mako into lp:openobject-server/7.0

Review: Approve Nice, seems to work well indeed. The python parser perhaps expects a well-formed Python source file, so it might randomly recognize some terms and not others, though I haven't investigated. Thanks for the fix! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-server/f

Re: [Openerp-community] new user cannot register to OpenErp forum (http error 500)

On 01/11/2013 03:04 AM, indra kurniawan wrote: Hi, several people cannot register to http://forum.openerp.com/forum/ucp.php?mode=register (http error 500) I just fixed it, could you please try again? Something had apparently gone wrong during a phpBB update at some point. __

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP 7.0: Call for translators!

Hello everyone, The translation templates were updated one last time today, just before the creation of the 7.0 series and branches on Launchpad, for the release. The default translation focus has been changed to the 7.0 series now, so it is best to translate 7.0 instead of trunk from now. Tr

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP 7.0: Call for translators!

On 12/21/2012 12:03 PM, Anders Wallenquist wrote: Question from the Swedish translation team: Will all translations done for server/addons and version 6.1 be copied to 7.0? We have thousands of hours of transkateing booth old bad translations and new with focus at 2012. The state of trunk (and n

[Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr into lp:openobject-addons

The proposal to merge lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr into lp:openobject-addons has been updated. Status: Needs review => Rejected For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr/+merge/135455 -- https:/

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr into lp:openobject-addons

Review: Disapprove process Hi LudoRA, Sorry for answering so late. Thanks for contributing translations! Unfortunately we cannot accept merge proposals for translations because it bypasses the translation process. As you're now a member of the French translation team you can apply the procedure

Re: [Openerp-community] What to do about *_layout in 7?

On 12/13/2012 01:57 PM, Alan Lord wrote: On 12/12/12 17:34, Olivier Dony wrote: = Invoices = I've just tested and the sequence and descriptions seem to propagate well between SO and Customer Invoice. On a side note the "handle" to reorder invoice lines is still missing, that wil

Re: [Openerp-community] What to do about *_layout in 7?

On 12/12/2012 09:31 AM, Alan Lord wrote: On 08/10/12 17:46, Olivier Dony wrote: The plan is: - line ordering enabled by default without needing an extra module - line ordering propagates throughout the workflow by default - multi-line/complex description allowed for each line by default

Re: [Openerp-community] Starts creating 7.0 series

On 12/11/2012 03:09 PM, "Lionel Sausin" wrote: Le 11/12/2012 11:25, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit : I started creating the 7.0 series on some of the community projects as we start migrate some modules. I did it without branching the 6.1 serie and I associated a brand new branch on them. The goal

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-chinese-team/openobject-doc/Chinese-init into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/6.1

Review: Approve On 12/04/2012 01:54 PM, Joshua Jan(SHINEIT) wrote: > We want use the "zh_CN" because there is three language(zh_CN, zh_TW, zh_HK) > in Chinese. They are different. Alright, I can see how it might confuse people if we simply used "zh", even though there may only be one Chinese tr

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-chinese-team/openobject-doc/Chinese-init into lp:~openerp-community/openobject-doc/6.1

Review: Needs Information Hi Joshua, Thanks for contributing to the OpenERP documentation/translation! Would you mind if we renamed the "zh_CN" subdirectory to just "zh" in order to be consistent with the naming of the other translations? (can be done when merging your proposal) Bonus questio

Re: [Openerp-community] OpenERP 7.0: Call for translators!

i18nmark/+merge/136875 [2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openerp/openobject-addons/trunk/revision/8188 [3] https://twitter.com/Erwin_vd_Ploeg/status/273067258308329472 On 11/24/2012 04:27 AM, Olivier Dony wrote: Dear OpenERP Contributors and Translators, A beta version of OpenERP 7.0 was publ

Re: [Openerp-community] Reviewing English strings (Re: OpenERP 7.0: Call for translators!)

On 11/28/2012 01:40 PM, Tóth Csaba wrote: i would like to mention at this point of the discussion, a lot of string in the source code are not marked as translatable text. For example if you open the addons/web/controllers/main.py at line 900 there is a string "You cannot leave any password empty

[Openerp-community] OpenERP 7.0: Call for translators!

Dear OpenERP Contributors and Translators, A beta version of OpenERP 7.0 was published last week, and the features and the terms to translate can now be considered frozen. It is therefore a good time to start working on the translations for OpenERP 7.0/trunk, in order to be able to complete them

[Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr into lp:openobject-addons

The proposal to merge lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr into lp:openobject-addons has been updated. Status: Needs review => Rejected For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr/+merge/135600

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr into lp:openobject-addons

Hi, Thanks a lot for your contributions to the french translation, and thanks Alexandre for the spellchecking. The process for improving translation is described in our documentation[1] and works via Launchpad's translation system, not with merge proposals/patches. This allows a proper review

Re: [Openerp-community] [Openerp-expert-framework] New Community Organization for OpenERP

On 11/16/2012 07:32 PM, Ovnicraft wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Olivier Dony wrote: On 11/16/2012 06:57 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote: @ovnicraft: I think we cannot do this without OpenERP agreement as they publish that on doc.openerp.com => @odony, did you confirm ? Indeed

Re: [Openerp-community] [Openerp-expert-framework] New Community Organization for OpenERP

On 11/16/2012 04:41 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote: Dear Community, We recently talked about joining our efforts to develop new OpenERP modules. For that purpose, we decided to create on Launchpad new projects sorted by topic with new teams to manage them. Excellent work, thanks a lot to all t

Re: [Openerp-community] [Openerp-expert-framework] New Community Organization for OpenERP

On 11/16/2012 06:57 PM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote: @ovnicraft: I think we cannot do this without OpenERP agreement as they publish that on doc.openerp.com => @odony, did you confirm ? Indeed I'd rather avoid fragmenting the documentation. I'm copying the main contents of Joel's mail to the

Re: [Openerp-community] Point of Sale hardware

On 11/06/2012 03:49 PM, Alan Bell wrote: So my questions now are as follows: have I understood this right? Yes, that's pretty much the idea. The proxy running on the local system could be anything, but having OpenERP installed with a POS module that supports the hardware would be a relatively

Re: [Openerp-community] Python 3 and OpenERP

On 10/27/2012 07:18 PM, Eric Caudal wrote: > With Ubuntu (from 12.10) switching to Python 3, is there any plan for OpenERP > to be Python 3 compatible (if this is not yet the case)? No plans yet, but Python 3 is only the default for Ubuntu 12.10 Desktop, not the server version. And Python 2.7 will

Re: [Openerp-community] Development Changes in OpenERP 7.0

On 10/22/2012 04:23 PM, Michael Njoku wrote: > I have been developing modules on openerp 6.1. I tried to install these > modules > on openerp 7.0 but i keep getting errors. Please can someone outline the > changes that have been made to the module structure in 7.0 and how to upgrade > your modules

Re: [Openerp-community] Problem with recreating standard-data

On 10/16/2012 04:07 PM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote: > Deleting the data is not your problem. Re-creating it is your problem. Exactly. Deletion of module data is managed by the ORM already. As Niels says, the question is about re-creating the data, and in fact you'll only get this kind of error when

Re: [Openerp-community] Problem with recreating standard-data

On 10/16/2012 10:05 AM, Marvin Hass wrote: > ValueError: No such external ID currently defined in the system: base.ad > 2012-10-16 06:58:00,734 5905 ERROR max_61 openerp.netsvc: No such > external ID currently defined in the system: base.ad > > If you want to generate this error -> follow this ste

Re: [Openerp-community] Analysing deeply WebClient 7.0 WAS::::: proposal to discuss forking of OpenERP GTK client

On 10/15/2012 04:20 PM, Nhomar Hernández wrote: > 5. don't understand your question; tabs are the same in web and GTK ? > > > Tabs, i mean, click and open in a new tab (browser tab) without reload entire > client or click and open an internal tab (as GTK does) i think both are > needed. Va

Re: [Openerp-community] proposal to discuss forking of OpenERP GTK client

On 10/15/2012 11:08 AM, Marco Dieckhoff wrote: > In this context, can you elaborate on the future of the XMLRPC interface, also > but not exclusively regarding backwards compatibility and thus stability > towards external programs? There is no plan and no reason to drop XML-RPC support, it is a ke

Re: [Openerp-community] proposal to discuss forking of OpenERP GTK client

On 10/11/2012 11:07 AM, Stefan Rijnhart wrote: > On 10/11/2012 10:50 AM, satyamitra maan wrote: >> yeah me to tried following the same, honestly we are not able to bring out >> any good module following the same. >> >> if there is no such document , may be some of existing custom modules on >> top

Re: [Openerp-community] proposal to discuss forking of OpenERP GTK client

On 10/11/2012 10:36 AM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote: > Printing the current workflow state of an object, proper handling of pdf files > (webclient still messes up mimetype which makes chrome not recognize it as > pdf). Printing the current workflow state works in 7.0 (via debug menu). This is a techn

  1   2   3   >