Hi,all!
I want to use xen on centos,but the kernel of centos is 2.6.18,and I saw that
Compile Fresh Kernel for Regression Suite
The OpenFlow regression suite does not require any particular kernel version,
but if you're using a VM and would like to run the tests with no external
hardware, using
Hi,
One more thing that is a bit ambigouos, which I'd like to get clarified (or at
least hear other people's opinion about it).
If I have the following scenario:
- A flow in table 0 matches the incoming packet
- puts an output-action on port 0 to the action set
- sends the packet to table 1
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. It seems this never made it to the 1.0 switch [1] or
nox [2] however. I was just wondering if this padding has ever been implemented
by someone; and if I did implement ofp_packet_in according to the spec., would
I lose compatibility with everyone else :).
Also you
2011/8/29 Zoltán Lajos Kis :
I think the expected behavior is to execute the table configured
default, i.e., one of :
OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_CONTROLLER , /* Send to controller. */
OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_CONTINUE /* Continue to the next table */
OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_DROP
But that doe
Hi,
Just to satisfy my own curiosity, won't the padding require the switch
to parse the packet to insert the padding before sending it to the
switch? This seems counter-intuitive since the packet is delivered to
the controller unparsed according to the spec.
However, it might actually make sense
Thanks for the feedback.
In fact it is a joint discovery with some of my colleagues; basically I
implemented the "latter", when fixing the switch against the oftest cases,
while they expected the "former", based on the specification :o).
Anyway, I'll make a somewhat formal proposal so that it c
As vlan tags are 32-bits-long, at least we don't need to bother with those.
But I guess the padding would be different for Ethernet II, and LLC/SNAP, given
the requirement. (I'm not going to guess the right padding lengths at this time
of the day). But the question is: if the padding is different