You have the shovel.
There are exits to the North and East.
-J
On Jan 5, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Jon Phillips wrote:
> pick up shovel.
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
> wrote:
>> On 1/5/10, Bassel Safadi wrote:
>>> Hi vernon,
>>> welcome to open font library
>>> we are upl
Yes, I was thinking about that, too. I don't know if it will work with
these varied licenses.
You can search by rights, even.
-J
On Jul 31, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
CC does a great job with their icons and descriptions.
Joshua Newman Design
401.225.7222
this
keep them monochrome along with the rest of the design. As long as
it is clear what each stands for and is easy to figure out their
meaning via mouseover, either with a :hover pseudo-class or a title
tooltip
James
On 31 Jul 2009, at 17:00, Joshua A.C. Newman wrote:
Nothing else on the
Nothing else on the site uses colors to distinguish things. It would
make these elements stand out dramatically.
I don't see why tooltips or a mouseover div wouldn't solve this issue
without bulking up the icon.
-J
On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
So do we have consensus
Very nice.
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez :
Okay, if you keep the orientation and use an oblique then that's
good.
like that?
That's what I originally had in mind, yes, spot on.
Maybe make the text a little thic
These are nice. Maybe the MIT can be ligated/monogrammed to loosen it
up on the edges?
And what about making the characters oblique to match the covers?
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez :
I'm not really happy with that
Aw. I liked the dinosaur/MIT one. Nice type.
But I bet you're right. It probably means it could be smaller, even.
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez :
I'm not really happy with that much text inside a tiny image.
I agree. How about just the fir
Great. Thanks.
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Sure.
Are these all the licenses available, though? I didn't understand the
outcome of the earlier thread.
I think it is safe to say: We all agree we will focus on these
licenses fo
ote:
2009/7/30 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Using colored shapes to differentiate would be much better (e.g.
iChat's
status markers)
Right - red circle for GPL, blue square for OFL, orange triangle
for MIT?
--
Stefano
Joshua Newman Design
401.225.7222
Sure.
Are these all the licenses available, though? I didn't understand the
outcome of the earlier thread.
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Using colored shapes to differentiate would be much better (e.g.
iChat's stat
Color blindness is more common than people think. 1/10 of males are
color blind and 1/100 women are. Using colored shapes to differentiate
would be much better (e.g. iChat's status markers)
Logos are, in fact, harder to read quickly. I was looking for a font
that fit certain license require
Please stop putting that in front of our eyes.
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
From: Ben Weiner
First ideas were a GNU head and a glyph for GPLv3 + font exception,
and perhaps a dinosaur(brontosaurus?) for MIT. But you will have
better suggestions :-)
Probably for GPL
,,, and such an attractive logo it is!
Who needs a graphic designer?
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Olivier BERTEN wrote:
FYI, there's an existing logo for GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/graphics/license-logos.html
Olivier
Dave Crossland a écrit :
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez :
Apart from that
Is there a whitepaper on this project? I don't understand what it is,
but every element I see looks delicious.
-J
On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Garrick Van Buren wrote:
Chris - thanks, that is a little different from the UA strings I was
seeing for Midori.
---
Garrick V
Congratulations, Dave!
Look for it in the Ashlar Project!
-J
On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
Hi,
I published my first typeface at http://abattis.org/cantarell :-)
--
Regards,
Dave
Joshua Newman Design
401.225.7222
Interesting! Thanks! I didn't realize their implementation was
actually to spec.
-J
On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:27 -0400, Joshua A.C. Newman wrote:
Yeah, I remember that this is an old thing. But now there is a
standard.
It depen
on't see MS changing though, it must prop up
the proprietary software culture quite hard as the weight of free
software network effects streamroll it :)
Downloading EOTs makes little sense to me. What use are they outside
a browser?
Regards, Dave
On 1 Jul 2009, 4:27 PM, "Joshua
work for linking to
those fonts? Would it work to generate EOTs for download as well?
-J
On Jul 1, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/1 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Oh, I'm not blaming Google or the engineer at all. I think it's
cool someone
picked up the project. It's
dent GPL code by a google software engineer in their
spare time.
Regards, Dave
On 1 Jul 2009, 3:39 PM, "Joshua A.C. Newman" > wrote:
If I used emoticons, I'd use the one with its eyes rolling at the
hoops Microsoft makes us jump through.
-J
On Jul 1, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Da
If I used emoticons, I'd use the one with its eyes rolling at the
hoops Microsoft makes us jump through.
-J
On Jul 1, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
Hi,
Its UNIX so should compile on OSX.
Regards, Dave
On 1 Jul 2009, 3:03 PM, "Joshua A.C. Newman" > wrote:
Am I correct that there's no Mac version?
-J
On Jul 1, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
Hi,
There is an eot converter on code.google.com and its no trouble to
convert freed fonts for IE.
Regards, Dave
On 1 Jul 2009, 12:56 AM, "Joshua A.C. Newman" > wrote:
Here's hopin'!
IE, naturally, doesn't support it. You need to use a tool to convert
True-Type (not OpenType) fonts with their Windows-only tool. I would
really, really love to be wrong about this. Please, someone show me
that I'm wrong. Please.
Microsoft. Making the Web worse.
-Joshua
O
Yeah! Just playing with it now!
Dig it:
http://craigmod.com/journal/font-face/
-Joshua
On Jun 30, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://getfirefox.com :-)
Joshua Newman Design
401.225.7222
ntional, but it looks like it
leans to the left).
I crit because I love. I'm really eager to see this font in its
completed form. I think it's quite elegant. I'm looking forward to an
italic. Will you do another weight?
-J
On Jun 24, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Dave Crossland wro
ody
and titles and become a feature of the brand.
So, what license are you using for it?
-Joshua
On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:05 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/6/23 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Well, I need something both low-contrast and modern for this
project. I
might even start with DIN or Futura. Not sur
Very nice! Positively Gillish! I think we may have a winner!
-J
On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:05 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/6/23 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Well, I need something both low-contrast and modern for this
project. I
might even start with DIN or Futura. Not sure yet.
You can use my
On Jun 23, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:34 -0400, Joshua A.C. Newman wrote:
Well, I need something both low-contrast and modern for this project.
I might even start with DIN or Futura. Not sure yet. In any event,
I'm
pretty sure I don't have the sub
n Jun 23, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/6/23 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Crud. It looks like it's time for a redraw.
I'd rather that you looked at Bodoni and made your own, original, low
contrast sans serif based on its skeletal forms, but you do whatever
you think is more
ne of those "new guy on the list brings up the same
thing we keep trying to do like it's a new idea" things?
-Joshua
On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/6/23 Joshua A.C. Newman :
Helvetica Neue, easily the most useful font in the OpenFont site,
is a 0k
file. I
Helvetica Neue, easily the most useful font in the OpenFont site, is a
0k file. I'd like very much to use it for an OSS project, but, well,
0k. Any recommendations?
-Joshua
Joshua Newman Design
401.225.7222
30 matches
Mail list logo
