El Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:59:31 -0500
Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net escribió:
The goal is to create a community of people
designing and releasing type, not to try and find legal loopholes to
annoy the very people we want to attract.
+1 :)
Regards,
Liam
Yes
Let's put our energy into getting font designers to support the
project, and not into trying to find a half-dozen fonts that were
badly released 10 or 20 years ago and might or might not be
protected by copyright. The goal is to create a community of people
designing and releasing type, not
Le Jeu 25 décembre 2008 05:55, Christopher Fynn a écrit :
People who are most vocal about being able to distribute fonts freely
most always seem to be talking about the work of others. Why is it I
don't hear this sort of suggestion from people who have designed
serious original fonts on
Christopher Fynn wrote:
Even if it were legally permissible in the US to distribute pre-1989
fonts without a copyright notice or registered copyright - do you
believe it would be ethical do this without the designer / font creators
agreement?
Yes, because this is how copyright works.
On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 12:03 -0200, minombresbond wrote:
here Ulrich Stiehl document that compiled more than 1000 Linotype
fonts which are in public domain since at least January 2008
http://www.sanskritweb.net/forgers/publicdomain.pdf
Compiled by Ulrich Stiehl, Heidelberg 2008
Fonts
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 00:43 -0500, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:13 -0500, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
It's my understanding that anything published in the U.S. before
March
1, 1989 without a valid copyright notice is in the public domain.
(unless the work was
