Nandalal --
The installation of VistA is actually *extremely* simple if you start
with OpenVistA SemiVivA or OpenVistA VivA
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/worldvista). What is complicated is
the configuration of VistA post-installation. There are attempts to
simplify it (e.g., Kevin Toppenberg
Bhaskar,
Thank you for the clarification. But i need to know
about the number of modules available in the Open
Vista, and the different "versions".
What is Vista Office? Is it suitable for a hospital or
more for a single physician's practice?
What is the best version to setup in a large hospital
Nandalal --
Unfortunately, I don't know enough to answer your questions except that
VistA Office is more suited to a practice whereas VistA/OpenVistA is
more suited to a hospital.
For more information, you should ask your questions on the list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (go to
http://sourceforge.net/proje
VistA-Office EHR has all the functionality that is in the FOIA release
of VistA which is what OpenVistA is based on. What is different about
it is that it has VA specific information removed and simplified patient
registration and several other "modifications".
cheers,
Joseph
K.S. Bhaskar wr
How large are these VA's? Like how many beds/clinical encounters per
year, etc?
-- IV
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:18:43 -0700
"Kamerick, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The San Francisco VA has a staff of 40+ technical people dedicated
>to
> the care and feeding of the local Vista system.
>
Ignacio,
This question would best be handled by one of the hardhats
subscribers. I know that the San Francisco VAMC is quite large...and
bed count isn't a good indicator of their complexity as the VA has
nearly doubled its workload without increasing its budget in the last
several years wh
