Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
> IT would seem to me that, what you favour is a system
> where, all patients will have their EMR with their GPs
> and nobody else and nowhere else.
>
Not so. The principle generalises and scales well.
> What is done in a
> hospital encounter, for example a Urologi
I presumed then and still presume that Mr. Gates like just about
everyone else grossly estimates the difficulty of Healthcare IT.
Optimism in this business is a disease that infects even those who
should know better such as faculty at schools of health informatics.
For example, classic software pro
Absolutely not! I do want the patient to be in control
of his/her data, with GPs assisting. I believe in a distributed
EMR with control by the patient. Sometimes we called
this a Virtual Medical/Patient Record (about 10 years ago in a
journaled publication).
Dave
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
> I
On Nov 22, 2006, at 5:51 AM, Seref Arikan wrote:
> Hi Will,
> I'd be very much interested in hearing more about SeeBeyond going open
> source. Would you please share any news on this one?
I seem to recall an interface engine being renamed SeeBeyond some
years ago, but I don't think it had anyt
On Nov 24, 2006, at 9:22 AM, David Forslund wrote:
> This, IMHO, has been the weakness of HL7 in that it has blurred
> the boundary of technology and semantics too much.
I'm afraid I have little to add to that but "Hear! Hear!"
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Oh would that my mind could l
