The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
until you're in a
situation where lots of people have lots of things
they want to
characterize in a system. It allows non-developers
to own and
augment their own notions of what data matters to
them, without
altering the underlying
Tim Churches wrote:
It will be very interesting to see what the UK NHS does with the
copyright and licensing of openEHR archetypes and specifications which
it creates. It doesn't really have much of a track record for releasing
its IP for wider use, does it? (Very few large govt health
Thomas Beale wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
It will be very interesting to see what the UK NHS does with the
copyright and licensing of openEHR archetypes and specifications which
it creates. It doesn't really have much of a track record for releasing
its IP for wider use, does it? (Very few
Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to work
effectively in the heterogeneous health IT ecosystem. Building
Since, we're talkin about interoperability...
I was wonderin what any group members think about the IHE
From the mobile Treo of
Edward A. Stern, RN
NothingBetter
'Expect nothing better!'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:25:28AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
No, we need the data in computable form
OK, that kills the easy solution. Or it might not. If you
don't blend both sources of information (background image
and user input) but rather keep them separate and blend on
David Forslund wrote:
Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to work
effectively in the heterogeneous health
Tim Churches wrote:
David Forslund wrote:
Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to work
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:25:28AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
No, we need the data in computable form
OK, that kills the easy solution. Or it might not. If you
don't blend both sources of information (background image
and user input) but rather keep them separate and
ksbhaskar wrote:
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
But if anyone can suggest an alternative for turning data recorded on
paper forms into data (as opposed to raster image) files, we'd love to
hear of it.
[KSB] Did you look at
Tim Churches wrote:
Tim,
we have talked about this before, and as I have said previously, I am
happy to see these licenses updated (they are a few years old by now).
However I am still not completely comfortable with the way openEHR
archetype definitions are licensed. The biggest problem is
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:16:07AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
The data retrieved from step 4 will be computable data ! Not
particularly well constrained, but not just image data either.
Ah, OK. Our problem is that many users only want to record data with a
pen, on
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
until you're in a
situation where lots of people have lots of things
they want to
characterize in a system. It allows non-developers
to own and
augment their own notions of what data matters to
them,
Thomas Beale wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
However I am still not completely comfortable with the way openEHR
archetype definitions are licensed. The biggest problem is probably the
indefinite nature of the licensing, because there is no direct reference
to the license(s) which cover them.
Hi Ime,
I'm happy to be allowed into the group. I never knew of such a
group...google doesnt seem to pick the yahoo groups?
Welcome! It is nice to see more and more people from Africa here.
Christian
15 matches
Mail list logo
