Hi Ime,
> I'm happy to be allowed into the group. I never knew of such a
> group...google doesnt seem to pick the yahoo groups?
Welcome! It is nice to see more and more people from Africa here.
Christian
Thomas Beale wrote:
> Tim Churches wrote:
>> However I am still not completely comfortable with the way openEHR
>> archetype definitions are licensed. The biggest problem is probably the
>> indefinite nature of the licensing, because there is no direct reference
>> to the license(s) which cover the
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
>
>> until you're in a
>> situation where lots of people have lots of things
>> they want to
>> characterize in a system. It allows non-developers
>> to own and
>> augment their own notions of what data matters to
Hello Friends,
I'm happy to be allowed into the group. I never knew of such a
group...google doesnt seem to pick the yahoo groups?
I am an informatician with a clinical background (MBBS). I live and
work in Nigeria. I believe in the open source principle and I think
it is great to be with othe
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:16:07AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
>
>>> The data retrieved from step 4 will be computable data ! Not
>>> particularly well constrained, but not just image data either.
>> Ah, OK. Our problem is that many users only want to record data with a
>>
Tim Churches wrote:
Tim,
we have talked about this before, and as I have said previously, I am
happy to see these licenses updated (they are a few years old by now).
> However I am still not completely comfortable with the way openEHR
> archetype definitions are licensed. The biggest problem is p
ksbhaskar wrote:
> --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [KSB] <...snip...>
>
>> But if anyone can suggest an alternative for turning data recorded on
>> paper forms into data (as opposed to raster image) files, we'd love to
>> hear of it.
>
> [KSB] Did y
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:16:07AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
> > The data retrieved from step 4 will be computable data ! Not
> > particularly well constrained, but not just image data either.
>
> Ah, OK. Our problem is that many users only want to record data with a
> pen, on paper. No typing,
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:25:28AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
>
No, we need the data in computable form
>>> OK, that kills the easy solution. Or it might not. If you
>>> don't blend both sources of information (background image
>>> and user input) but rather keep them
Tim Churches wrote:
> David Forslund wrote:
>
>> Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
>>
>>> Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
>>> etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
>>> improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to w
David Forslund wrote:
> Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
>> Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
>> etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
>> improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to work
>> effectively in the heterogeneou
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:25:28AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
> >> No, we need the data in computable form
> > OK, that kills the easy solution. Or it might not. If you
> > don't blend both sources of information (background image
> > and user input) but rather keep them separate and blend on
> >
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
> But if anyone can suggest an alternative for turning data recorded on
> paper forms into data (as opposed to raster image) files, we'd love to
> hear of it.
[KSB] Did you look at Ocrad
(http://www.gn
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:04:35AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
>> No, we need the data in computable form
> OK, that kills the easy solution. Or it might not. If you
> don't blend both sources of information (background image
> and user input) but rather keep them separate a
Since, we're talkin about interoperability...
I was wonderin what any group members think about the IHE
>From the mobile Treo of
Edward A. Stern, RN
NothingBetter
'Expect nothing better!'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
> Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
> etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
> improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to work
> effectively in the heterogeneous health IT ecosystem. Build
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:04:35AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
> >> surprisingly tricky and fragile). But it does support dataset
> >> versioning, so that the latest version of source data can be loaded into
> >> a new dataset in the background while users continue to use an existing
> >> dataset,
Thomas Beale wrote:
> Tim Churches wrote:
>> It will be very interesting to see what the UK NHS does with the
>> copyright and licensing of openEHR archetypes and specifications which
>> it creates. It doesn't really have much of a track record for releasing
>> its IP for wider use, does it? (Very
Tim Churches wrote:
> It will be very interesting to see what the UK NHS does with the
> copyright and licensing of openEHR archetypes and specifications which
> it creates. It doesn't really have much of a track record for releasing
> its IP for wider use, does it? (Very few large govt health auth
The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
> until you're in a
> situation where lots of people have lots of things
> they want to
> characterize in a system. It allows non-developers
> to own and
> augment their own notions of what data matters to
> them, without
> altering the underly
20 matches
Mail list logo
