RE: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-30 Thread Nandalal Gunaratne
Koray Atalag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pls. do not take my prior post as advertising of a company; and I assure you that I have no financial interest with this company... If it was it was poor advertising! The link gave a 404 error :-( Thanks for a dumb gui for dumb and dumber

Re: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-28 Thread Nandalal Gunaratne
Rick Stockton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone advise me, why does OpenEMR tend to have so many checkboxes in its forms? (I am without a clue, just a sentence or two is sufficient.) Free form

RE: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-28 Thread Koray Atalag
GUI for healtcare users... Comments? -koray _ From: openhealth@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nandalal Gunaratne Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 11:04 AM To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid

RE: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-28 Thread Koray Atalag
_ From: openhealth@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Koray Atalag Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 11:17 AM To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex Hi to all, Regarding the GUI and checkboxes

[openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-27 Thread Rick Stockton
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:This was really the gist of my original comments - software developers working without close and constant clinical contact will end up building systems that are conceptually